Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust law (2)
- United States (2)
- Climatic changes (1)
- Commerce (1)
- Department of Justice (1)
-
- Donation of organs (1)
- Donation of organs tissues etc. (1)
- Environmental protection (1)
- Etc.--Law and legislation (1)
- Green industries (1)
- Human reproductive technology--Law and legislation (1)
- Kamakachi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1)
- Monopsonies (1)
- Price fixing (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Renewable energy sources (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Tissues (1)
- Trade (1)
- World Trade Organization (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Next Generation Of Trade And Environment Conflicts: The Rise Of Green Industrial Policy, Mark Wu, James Salzman
The Next Generation Of Trade And Environment Conflicts: The Rise Of Green Industrial Policy, Mark Wu, James Salzman
Faculty Scholarship
A major shift is transforming the trade and environment field, triggered by governments’ rising use of industrial policies to spark nascent renewable energy industries and to restrict exports of certain minerals in the face of political economy constraints. While economically distorting, these policies do produce significant economic and environmental benefits. At the same time, they often violate World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, leading to increasingly harsh conflicts between trading partners.
This Article presents a comprehensive analysis of these emerging conflicts, arguing that they represent a sharp break from past trade and environment disputes. It examines the causes of the shift …
Elhauge On Tying: Vindicated By History, Barak D. Richman, Steven W. Usselman
Elhauge On Tying: Vindicated By History, Barak D. Richman, Steven W. Usselman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Kamakahi V. Asrm: The Egg Donor Price Fixing Litigation, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Kamakahi V. Asrm: The Egg Donor Price Fixing Litigation, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Faculty Scholarship
In April 2011, Lindsay Kamakahi caused an international stir by suing the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), SART-member fertility clinics, and a number of egg donor agencies on behalf of herself and other oocyte donors. The suit challenged the ASRM-SART oocyte donor compensation guidelines, which limit payments to egg donors to $5,000 ($10,000 under special circumstances), as an illegal price-fixing agreement in violation of United States antitrust laws.
Ensuing discussion of the case has touched on familiar debates surrounding coercion, commodification, and exploitation. It has also revealed many misconceptions about oocyte donation, …