Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Alexander v. Daley (1)
- Conference (1)
- District of Columbia (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
-
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Freedom of Speech (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Justice (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Parental notification (Medical law) (1)
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1)
- Race (1)
- Race-Conscious Policies (1)
- Racial Justice (1)
- Right of abortion (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- Shaw v. Reno (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Tinker (1)
- Trial practice (1)
- Voting Rights Act (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Casey Skit: A Pedagogical Tool For Interviewing Young Women And Proceeding Through A Judicial Bypass Hearing , Jamin B. Raskin, Ann Shalleck
Casey Skit: A Pedagogical Tool For Interviewing Young Women And Proceeding Through A Judicial Bypass Hearing , Jamin B. Raskin, Ann Shalleck
Jamin Raskin
No abstract provided.
Roe V. Wade And The Dred Scott Decision: Justice Scalia's Peculiar Analogy In Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Jamin B. Raskin
Roe V. Wade And The Dred Scott Decision: Justice Scalia's Peculiar Analogy In Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Jamin B. Raskin
Jamin Raskin
No abstract provided.
Transcript For Introduction: The Constitutional Importance Of The District Of Columbia, Jamin B. Raskin
Transcript For Introduction: The Constitutional Importance Of The District Of Columbia, Jamin B. Raskin
Jamin Raskin
No abstract provided.
Race, Law And Justice: The Rehnquist Court And The American Dilemma , Paul Butler, Richard D. Kahlenberg, Roger Pilon, Robert S. Chang, David Kairys, Jamin B. Raskin, Charles J. Cooper, Phil Tajitsu Nash, Jeffret\Y Rosen, Adrienne D. Davis, Alexandra Natapoff, Katheryn K. Russell, Angela Jordan Newton, Burton Wechsler, Mark Hager, Clarence Page, Brenda Wright, Stuart Ishimaru, Frank R. Parker, Frank H. Wu
Race, Law And Justice: The Rehnquist Court And The American Dilemma , Paul Butler, Richard D. Kahlenberg, Roger Pilon, Robert S. Chang, David Kairys, Jamin B. Raskin, Charles J. Cooper, Phil Tajitsu Nash, Jeffret\Y Rosen, Adrienne D. Davis, Alexandra Natapoff, Katheryn K. Russell, Angela Jordan Newton, Burton Wechsler, Mark Hager, Clarence Page, Brenda Wright, Stuart Ishimaru, Frank R. Parker, Frank H. Wu
Jamin Raskin
No abstract provided.
Symposium: No Enclaves Of Totalitarianism: The Triumph And Unrealized Promise Of The Tinker Decision , Jamin B. Raskin
Symposium: No Enclaves Of Totalitarianism: The Triumph And Unrealized Promise Of The Tinker Decision , Jamin B. Raskin
Jamin Raskin
The Supreme Court's decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District forty years ago did for the ideal of expressive freedom in America's public schools what Brown v. Board of Education did for the ideal of racial equality. It made a core value of the Bill of Rights spring to life for young people facing authoritarian treatment at the hands of adult officials running their school systems. By privileging the right of students to engage in passionate political communication over the school's interest in maintaining discipline or the community’s interest in maintaining pro-war consensus, the Tinker decision was …
Conference: Supreme Court, Racial Politics, And The Right To Vote: Shaw V. Reno And The Future Of The Voting Rights Act, Julian Bond, Katharine Inglis Butler, Penda Hair, Anita S. Hodgkiss, Samuel Isaacharoff, Richard Jerome, David Kairys, Pamela S. Karlan, Robert A. Kengle, Loretta King, J. Morgan Kousser, Allan J. Lichtman, Binny Miller, Frank R. Parker, Richard H. Pildes, Jamin B. Raskin, Edward Still, Donald B. Verilli, Jr., Alex Willingham, Brenda Wright
Conference: Supreme Court, Racial Politics, And The Right To Vote: Shaw V. Reno And The Future Of The Voting Rights Act, Julian Bond, Katharine Inglis Butler, Penda Hair, Anita S. Hodgkiss, Samuel Isaacharoff, Richard Jerome, David Kairys, Pamela S. Karlan, Robert A. Kengle, Loretta King, J. Morgan Kousser, Allan J. Lichtman, Binny Miller, Frank R. Parker, Richard H. Pildes, Jamin B. Raskin, Edward Still, Donald B. Verilli, Jr., Alex Willingham, Brenda Wright
Jamin Raskin
On September 9, 1994, The American University Law Review and the Law and Government Program of The Washington College of Law cohosted a conference addressing voting rights, with an emphasis on recent Supreme Courtjurisprudence, and Shaw v. Reno in particular. The conference brought together many of the leading scholars and practitioners involved in this area of the law. The day's events included four panel discussions and a luncheon speech by Julian Bond, the transcripts of which the Law Review is honored to publish.