Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Does A Broad Free Exercise Right Require A Narrow Definition Of Religion, 39 Hastings Const. L.Q. 357 (2012), Donald L. Beschle
Does A Broad Free Exercise Right Require A Narrow Definition Of Religion, 39 Hastings Const. L.Q. 357 (2012), Donald L. Beschle
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
In the 1990 case of Employment Division v. Smith, a sharply divided Supreme Court abandoned the routine application of strict scrutiny when considering Free Exercise Clause claims seeking exemption from generally applicable legal duties or prohibitions. The Court returned to an older view of the Free Exercise Clause as protecting believers only from government acts that were aimed specifically at beliefs, and that grew out of hostility to the religion rather than a desire to further legitimate secular goals.
Reaction to Smith was largely negative, and legislative and state court responses followed, seeking to restore strict scrutiny as the appropriate …
The Framers' Federalism And The Affordable Care Act, 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1071 (2012), Steven D. Schwinn
The Framers' Federalism And The Affordable Care Act, 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1071 (2012), Steven D. Schwinn
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Federalism challenges to the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") are inspired by the relatively recent resurgence in federalism concerns in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence. Thus, ACA opponents seek to leverage the Court-created distinction between encouragement and compulsion (in opposition to Medicaid expansion), and the Court-created federalism concern when Congress regulates in a way that could destroy the distinction between what is national and what is local (in opposition to universal coverage).
But outside the jurisprudence, the text and history of constitutional federalism tell another story. The text and history suggest that the Constitution created a powerful federal government, of the people …
The Birthright Citizenship Controversy: A Study Of Conservative Substance And Rhetoric, 18 Tex. Hisp. J. L. & Pol'y 49 (2012), Allen R. Kamp
The Birthright Citizenship Controversy: A Study Of Conservative Substance And Rhetoric, 18 Tex. Hisp. J. L. & Pol'y 49 (2012), Allen R. Kamp
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
This essay is a critique of the conservative rhetoric used in attack of birthright citizenship--as granted by Clause One of the Fourteenth Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” The rhetoric of that attack violates the traditional canons of conservative argumentation and interpretation, such as original intent and textualism. As such, conservatives' arguments call into question the seriousness of their allegiance to these canons.
This article will not discuss the pros and cons of what we …
Medicaid Governance In The Wake Of National Federation Of Independent Business V. Sebelius: Finding Federalism's Middle Pathway, From Administrative Law To State Compacts, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 601 (2012), John D. Blum, Gayland O. Hethcoat Ii
Medicaid Governance In The Wake Of National Federation Of Independent Business V. Sebelius: Finding Federalism's Middle Pathway, From Administrative Law To State Compacts, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 601 (2012), John D. Blum, Gayland O. Hethcoat Ii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mommy, Where Is Home: Imputing Parental Immigration Status And Residency For Undocumented Immigrant Children, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 991 (2012), Johanna K.P. Dennis
Mommy, Where Is Home: Imputing Parental Immigration Status And Residency For Undocumented Immigrant Children, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 991 (2012), Johanna K.P. Dennis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity: Protecting All But The Plainly Incompetent (And Maybe Some Of Them, Too), 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2012), Susan Bendlin
Qualified Immunity: Protecting All But The Plainly Incompetent (And Maybe Some Of Them, Too), 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2012), Susan Bendlin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fair For Whom? Amazon Kindles The Fight Over Internet Sales Tax, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 357 (2012), Matthew Martin
Fair For Whom? Amazon Kindles The Fight Over Internet Sales Tax, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 357 (2012), Matthew Martin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medical Provider Claims: Standing, Assignments, And Erisa Preemption, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 861 (2012), Kevin Wiggins
Medical Provider Claims: Standing, Assignments, And Erisa Preemption, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 861 (2012), Kevin Wiggins
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lotteries And Public Policy In American Law, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 37 (2012), Stephen Leacock
Lotteries And Public Policy In American Law, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 37 (2012), Stephen Leacock
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech For Judges And Due Process For Litigants: The Elimination Of First And Fourteenth Amendment Mutual Exclusivity In Siefert V. Alexander, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 333 (2012), Margaret Mares
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Guy Fawkes's Dangerous Remedy: The Unconstitutionality Of Government-Ordered Assassination Against U.S. Citizens And Its Implications For Due Process In America, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1121 (2012), Emily Kendall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.