Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 22 of 22

Full-Text Articles in Law

Cases On Partnership And Other Unincorporated Associations, By Scott Rowley, Robert Brown Dec 2012

Cases On Partnership And Other Unincorporated Associations, By Scott Rowley, Robert Brown

Dr Robert Brown

No abstract provided.


Who Let You Into The House?, Lawrence Hamermesh Dec 2012

Who Let You Into The House?, Lawrence Hamermesh

Lawrence A. Hamermesh

Recent Congressional corporate governance initiatives have reallocated to independent directors the functions of hiring and supervising the work of certain “gatekeepers,” and some have proposed such a reallocation with respect to general counsel, as a means to address cognitive biases and capture by senior management that may prevent inside counsel from identifying and preventing corporate misconduct. That proposal, however, does not sufficiently account for the positive effect on corporate conduct arising from a close relationship of trust and confidence between general counsel and the CEO or other senior managers. Eliminating such a relationship is likely to undermine access to internal …


A New Form Of Business Entity Is Needed To Promote Social Entrepreneurship: The Not-For-Loss Corporation, Jay Milbrandt Oct 2012

A New Form Of Business Entity Is Needed To Promote Social Entrepreneurship: The Not-For-Loss Corporation, Jay Milbrandt

Jay Milbrandt

No abstract provided.


Attorney-General Of Pakistan - A Brief Overview, Umair Ghori Oct 2012

Attorney-General Of Pakistan - A Brief Overview, Umair Ghori

Umair H. Ghori

The legal system of Pakistan represents a fusion of the Shariah law and common law systems. Traditionally, the Pakistani legal system adapted the pre-1947 colonial law for local use. Amendments to these colonial laws, in particular inspired by the Islamic traditions, have been interspersed in intervals. As a result, the Pakistan legal system retains fundamental common law doctrines (such as binding precedent and delegated legislation) while gradually integrating laws of Islamic origin within the existing common law framework. However, Pakistan's legal system is far from being a complete mirror of the English legal system. One such major distinction is that …


The Stakeholder Strategy, Kent Greenfield Sep 2012

The Stakeholder Strategy, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


Is The Anti-Muhammad Film Constitutionally Unprotected 'Fighting Words'?, Kent Greenfield Sep 2012

Is The Anti-Muhammad Film Constitutionally Unprotected 'Fighting Words'?, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


A New Strategy To Fight Citizens United, Kent Greenfield Sep 2012

A New Strategy To Fight Citizens United, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


Are Shareholders Owners?, Kent Greenfield Aug 2012

Are Shareholders Owners?, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


The Wobbly Legal Arguments Against Dodd-Frank, Kent Greenfield Jul 2012

The Wobbly Legal Arguments Against Dodd-Frank, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


Ancillary Joint Ventures And The Unanswered Questions After Revenue Ruling 2004-51 Jul 2012

Ancillary Joint Ventures And The Unanswered Questions After Revenue Ruling 2004-51

Gabriel O Aitsebaomo

Ever since the Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") issued Revenue Ruling 98-15… in which it emphasized "control" as a critical factor in determining whether a tax-exempt hospital that enters into a whole-hospital joint venture with a for-profit entity would continue to maintain its tax-exemption, practitioners and scholars alike have sought guidance from the Service regarding whether such "control" would also be required of an exempt organization that enters into an "ancillary joint venture" with a for-profit entity. In response, the Service issued Revenue Ruling 2004-51 on May 6, 2004.

… In Revenue Ruling 2004-51, the Service enunciated that a tax-exempt …


The Biological Basis For The Recognition Of The Family, Scott Fitzgibbon Jun 2012

The Biological Basis For The Recognition Of The Family, Scott Fitzgibbon

Scott T. FitzGibbon

The family is matter of heart and blood. It is created, in part, by physical and emotional intimacy. It projects itself through history through its biological dimension. Any reasonable definition of the family must recognize this fundamental characteristic. “Biological dimension” here refers, not only to genetic affinities, important as those may be, but to all physical connections and to all matters closely related to the physical. Thus, it includes all the activities and dispositions which, generation after generation, bring a family together in the great procreative project: the begetting and rearing of children. The biological dimension includes making love and …


Panelist, Control The Corporation Conference, Kent Greenfield Apr 2012

Panelist, Control The Corporation Conference, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

Website for the conference videos: http://csrl.org/2012/04/14/control-the-corporation-conference-videos/


Obama’S Odds Of Winning The Health Care Ruling: 37%, Kent Greenfield Mar 2012

Obama’S Odds Of Winning The Health Care Ruling: 37%, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


Is The Sexual Promiscuity Of Straight Men A Reason To Oppose Gay Marriage?, Kent Greenfield Mar 2012

Is The Sexual Promiscuity Of Straight Men A Reason To Oppose Gay Marriage?, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


Human Rights Compliance And Accountability For U.S. Multinational Enterprises: A Principled Step Forward After Sosa And Kiobel, Paul Regan Mar 2012

Human Rights Compliance And Accountability For U.S. Multinational Enterprises: A Principled Step Forward After Sosa And Kiobel, Paul Regan

Paul L Regan

This article proposes a Congressional statutory solution to resolve when a multinational corporation can be liable under the Alien Tort Statute on a claim for human rights abuses arising from a corporation’s overseas business operations. Under this proposal a U.S. multinational would be directly liable for human rights violations of its overseas subsidiary where it (1) failed to ensure that its overseas subsidiary had in place a reasonably effective and functioning human rights compliance system or (2) acquired knowledge of ongoing human rights violations by its overseas subsidiary and failed to take meaningful corrective measures in a timely way.


Global Textiles And Clothing Trade - Trade Policy Perspectives, Umair Ghori Feb 2012

Global Textiles And Clothing Trade - Trade Policy Perspectives, Umair Ghori

Umair H. Ghori

The author presents substantial case studies of the effect of the abolition of quotas on global trade in this sector. Concentrating mainly on China and Pakistan but also examining India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and seven other Asian T&C manufacturing countries, he contrasts post-abolition reality with pre-abolition predictions of the impact of abolishing quotas, and details the continuing distortion caused by tariffs, non-tariff barriers and through trade remedies such as safeguards and anti-dumping. All of the analysis is supported by the judicious use and interpretation of extensive statistics, compelling arguments, and interviews with entrepreneurs and trade officials in Pakistan (as a case …


Toward A Public Enforcement Model For Directors' Duty Of Oversight, Renee Jones, Michelle Welsh Feb 2012

Toward A Public Enforcement Model For Directors' Duty Of Oversight, Renee Jones, Michelle Welsh

Renee Jones

This Article proposes a public enforcement model for the fiduciary duties of corporate directors. Under the dominant model of corporate governance, the principal function of the board of directors is to oversee the conduct of senior corporate officials. When directors fail to provide proper oversight, the consequences can be severe for shareholders, creditors, employees, and society at large. Despite general agreement on the importance of director oversight, courts have yet to develop a coherent doctrine governing director liability for the breach of oversight duties. In Delaware, the dominant state for U.S. corporate law, the courts tout the importance of board …


Why Progressives Should Oppose A Constitutional Amendment To End Corporate "Personhood", Kent Greenfield Jan 2012

Why Progressives Should Oppose A Constitutional Amendment To End Corporate "Personhood", Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


How To Make The 'Citizens United' Decision Worse, Kent Greenfield Jan 2012

How To Make The 'Citizens United' Decision Worse, Kent Greenfield

Kent Greenfield

No abstract provided.


Enlightened Shareholder Value, Social Responsibility, And The Redefinition Of Corporate Purpose Without Law, David Millon Dec 2011

Enlightened Shareholder Value, Social Responsibility, And The Redefinition Of Corporate Purpose Without Law, David Millon

David K. Millon

No abstract provided.


Net Neutrality And Nondiscrimination Norms In Telecommunications, Daniel Lyons Dec 2011

Net Neutrality And Nondiscrimination Norms In Telecommunications, Daniel Lyons

Daniel Lyons

“Net neutrality” refers to the principle that broadband providers should not discriminate when transporting content and applications over the Internet. After several years of debate, the Federal Communications Commission adopted binding net neutrality rules in December 2010. The cornerstone of this regime is a binding rule that forbids broadband providers from unreasonably discriminating when delivering Internet traffic.The prohibition on unreasonable discrimination has a long pedigree in telecommunications law, and net neutrality proponents have long asserted the need to extend that nondiscrimination norm to cyberspace. But the Commission’s net neutrality rules impose far greater obligations on broadband providers than the law …


Law, Fact, And Discretion In The Federal Courts: An Empirical Study, Robert Anderson Dec 2011

Law, Fact, And Discretion In The Federal Courts: An Empirical Study, Robert Anderson

Robert Anderson IV

The organization of the federal judiciary rests upon a division of labor between trial courts and appellate courts. Central to this division of labor is the standard of review, which requires that appellate courts review factual and discretionary decisions deferentially. The conventional wisdom is that appellate courts almost never reverse trial court findings of fact and rarely reverse discretionary decisions. The prevailing view, however, is greatly oversimplified. Data from federal cases suggest that standards of review operate in a much more complex and nuanced way than the conventional account would indicate. The empirical evidence suggests that the appellate courts routinely …