Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (10)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (9)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
-
- Legal History (5)
- Political Science (5)
- American Politics (4)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Business (3)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (3)
- Natural Resources Law (3)
- Political Theory (3)
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Economic Theory (2)
- Economics (2)
- Election Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- International Relations (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- Abigail R. Moncrieff (4)
- Justin Schwartz (4)
- Austin R Caster (3)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Jennifer Hammitt (3)
-
- Nadia N. Sawicki (3)
- Sarah Montana Hart (3)
- Steven D. Smith (3)
- palma joy strand (3)
- Ari E Waldman (2)
- Brian M McCall (2)
- David Sloss (2)
- Edward Cantu (2)
- Joshua Kleinfeld (2)
- Justin Levitt (2)
- Keith J Larson JD (2)
- Lanessa L. owens (2)
- Lee J Strang (2)
- Mark Strasser (2)
- Nicholas Stephanopoulos (2)
- Steven A. Krieger (2)
- Tara L. Grove (2)
- Aaron Christopher Bryant (1)
- Adria De Landri (1)
- Allegra M. McLeod (1)
- Allison Wells (1)
- Amanda Hollis-Brusky (1)
- Andrew E. Taslitz (1)
- Anup Malani (1)
- Asheesh Bhalla (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 163
Full-Text Articles in Law
Missouri's Innocent Citizens: An Examination Of Missouri's Response To Domestic Violence Incidents Against Children And Teens, Keith P. Freie
Missouri's Innocent Citizens: An Examination Of Missouri's Response To Domestic Violence Incidents Against Children And Teens, Keith P. Freie
Keith P Freie
In 2010 the Missouri Attorney’s General’s Office created a Domestic Violence Task Force for the purpose of analyzing Missouri’s Domestic Violence laws. In 2011, the Missouri General Assembly enacted Senate Bill 320 which included several changes to Missouri’s domestic violence laws stemming from several recommendations from the Attorney General’s Task Force. While Missouri’s 2011 domestic violence law is a comprehensive solution to the many unaddressed needs of child and teen domestic violence victims, additional solutions need to be considered to fully address the problem. Those solutions may include creating special domestic violence and child abuse courts and creating educational programs …
Command Responsibility In The International Tribunals: Is There A Hierarchy?, Adria De Landri
Command Responsibility In The International Tribunals: Is There A Hierarchy?, Adria De Landri
Adria De Landri
No abstract provided.
A Health Care Autopsy, Marc Gans
A Health Care Autopsy, Marc Gans
Marc Gans
This paper analyzes each of the factors responsible for the rapid rise in health care spending in this country. This includes an in-depth analysis of prescription drug expenditures, which has been the fastest growing component of health care costs. Lastly, this paper will address whether there is anything particularly unique about health care spending in California.
The Hollowness Of The Harm Principle, Steven D. Smith
The Hollowness Of The Harm Principle, Steven D. Smith
Steven D. Smith
Among the various instruments in the toolbox of liberalism, the so-called “harm principle,” presented as the central thesis of John Stuart Mill’s classic On Liberty, has been one of the most popular. The harm principle has been widely embraced and invoked in both academic and popular debate about a variety of issues ranging from obscenity to drug regulation to abortion to same-sex marriage, and its influence is discernible in legal arguments and judicial opinions as well. Despite the principle’s apparent irresistibility, this essay argues that the principle is hollow. It is an empty vessel, alluring but without any inherent legal …
Justice Douglas, Justice O'Connor, And George Orwell: Does The Constitution Compel Us To Disown Our Past, Steven D. Smith
Justice Douglas, Justice O'Connor, And George Orwell: Does The Constitution Compel Us To Disown Our Past, Steven D. Smith
Steven D. Smith
Justice William O. Douglas's majority opinion in Zorach v. Clauson famously asserted that "[w]e are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being." What did Douglas mean, and was he right? More recently, in cases involving the Ten Commandments, the Pledge of Allegiance and other public expressions and symbols, the Supreme Court has said that the Constitution prohibits government from endorsing religion. Can Douglas's "Supreme Being" assertion be reconciled with the "no endorsement" prohibition? And does the more modern doctrine demand that we forget, falsify, or forswear our pervasively religious political heritage? This essay, presented as the William O. …
The Tenuous Case For Conscience, Steven D. Smith
The Tenuous Case For Conscience, Steven D. Smith
Steven D. Smith
If there is any single theme that has provided the foundation of modern liberalism and has infused our more specific constitutional commitments to freedom of religion and freedom of speech, that theme is probably “freedom of conscience.” But some observers also perceive a progressive cheapening of conscience– even a sort of degradation. Such criticisms suggest the need for a contemporary rethinking of conscience. When we reverently invoke “conscience,” do we have any idea what we are talking about? Or are we just exploiting a venerable theme for rhetorical purposes without any clear sense of what “conscience” is or why it …
"Because That's Where The Money Is": A Theory Of Corporate Legal Compliance, William Bradford
"Because That's Where The Money Is": A Theory Of Corporate Legal Compliance, William Bradford
william bradford
Upon his capture in 1934, the legendary bank robber Willie Sutton was asked by FBI agents, Why do you rob banks, Willie? Sutton, who believed the question to be rhetorical, replied, dryly, Because that's where the money is. In other words, Sutton understood his interrogator to be inquiring as to why he robbed banks rather than, say, homes, or gas stations, or church offering plates. Had he understood the query as intended - i.e., what was it about Willie Sutton the impelled Willie Sutton to crime when many others, struggling to survive the Great Depression, were not? - Sutton could …
Public Choice Concepts And Applications In Law, Maxwell Stearns, Todd Zywicki
Public Choice Concepts And Applications In Law, Maxwell Stearns, Todd Zywicki
Maxwell L. Stearns
This is the only course book specifically designed to instruct law students in the discipline of public choice. The book provides a comprehensive, but nontechnical, overview of interest group theory, social choice theory, and game theory (along with elementary price theory), and ties these concepts to a wide range of topics in both public and private law. The book contains chapters devoted to each set of methodological tools and to specific institutional settings: legislatures, courts, executive branch (and bureaus), and constitutions.
Emerging Models For Alternatives To Marriage, Sanford N. Katz
Emerging Models For Alternatives To Marriage, Sanford N. Katz
Sanford N. Katz
Perhaps one of the most important changes in family law in the past thirty years has been the inclusion of certain kinds of friendships in the range of relationships from which rights and responsibilities can flow. Domestic partnership laws, a phenomenon of the 1990s, may be seen as a natural development from the judicial recognition of contract cohabitation and the legislative and judicial response to same-sex couples who, unable to meet statutory requirements for marriage, have sought official recognition of their relationships. This essay discusses an aspect of certain kinds of domestic partnership laws-their formal requirements and the extent to …
In Defense Of Judicial Prudence, Nicholas Buccola, Aila Wallace
In Defense Of Judicial Prudence, Nicholas Buccola, Aila Wallace
Nicholas Buccola
This essay has two basic aims. First, we want to show that the three major theories of judicial review – majoritarianism, perfectionism, and originalism – have at their core commitments to “cardinal virtues” – temperance, justice, fortitude. In the first part of the essay, we describe each of the cardinal virtues in conjunction with a description of each judicial philosophy and demonstrate how each virtue fits at the center of each philosophy. Second, we want to show how a full appreciation of the cardinal virtues should lead us to endorse “prudentialism” as the best approach to judicial review in the …
Watching The Hen House: Judicial Review Of Judicial Rulemaking, Carrie Leonetti
Watching The Hen House: Judicial Review Of Judicial Rulemaking, Carrie Leonetti
Carrie Leonetti
Courts regularly engage in rulemaking of questionable constitutionality, then exercise the exclusive jurisdiction of judicial review to rule on constitutional challenges to the rules that they themselves have promulgated, obfuscating the appearance of impartiality and accountability and preventing the unsophisticated from realizing that a benefit has been conferred on a more sophisticated faction.
Quasi-legislative judicial rulemaking that has resulted from Congressional delegations of rulemaking authority to the courts is increasingly prevalent in the past half century, the result of which is a multi-tiered system of consultation, review, and revision that depends heavily upon nonlegislative actors and a Balkanization of the …
The Toll Road Not Taken: Could The One Option Less Used Make A Difference?, Carlos C. Sun
The Toll Road Not Taken: Could The One Option Less Used Make A Difference?, Carlos C. Sun
Carlos C Sun
There is a growing transportation financing crisis in the United States caused by a rapidly aging transportation infrastructure, a growing demand for transportation, soaring infrastructure costs and a lack of systematic planning to account for these multiple trends. Potholes, deteriorating bridges and cracked pavements are everywhere, regardless of geographical location, climate or population density. Such infrastructure deterioration negatively impacts the environment via pollution, wasted fuel and inefficient travel patterns. Courts in states such as California have responded pragmatically to the crisis by opening the door to road tolling in various forms. This shift in states’ attitudes toward toll roads comes …
When Parallel Tracks Cross: Applying The New Insider Trading Regulations Under Dodd-Frank Derails, Gregory J. Melus
When Parallel Tracks Cross: Applying The New Insider Trading Regulations Under Dodd-Frank Derails, Gregory J. Melus
Gregory J Melus
Abstract: When Parallel Tracks Cross: Applying the New Insider Trading Regulations under Dodd-Frank Derails On March 11, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought an administrative proceeding against former Goldman Sachs Director, Rajat Gupta for participating in the insider trading scheme of Raj Rajaratnam. The complaint was the first application of the SEC’s expanded authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to charge an unregistered entity for securities violations in an SEC enforcement hearing. This Comment argues that bringing an SEC administrative proceeding against Rajat Gupta would not succeed because the retroactive application of the Dodd-Frank law would fail the …
Save The Economy: Break Up The Big Banks And Shape Up The Regulators, Charles W. Murdock
Save The Economy: Break Up The Big Banks And Shape Up The Regulators, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Save the Economy: Break Up the Big Banks and Shape Up the Regulators
The U.S. economy is still reeling from the financial crisis that exploded in the fall of 2008. This article asserts that the big banks were major culprits in causing the crisis, by funding the non-bank lenders that created the toxic mortgages which the big banks securitized and sold to unwary investors. Paradoxically, banks which were then too big to fail are even larger today.
The article briefly reviews the history of banking from the Founding Fathers to the deregulatory mindset that has been present since 1980. It …
Civil Protective Orders In Integrated Domestic Violence Court: An Empirical Study, Erika Rickard
Civil Protective Orders In Integrated Domestic Violence Court: An Empirical Study, Erika Rickard
Erika Rickard
New York's Integrated Domestic Violence (IDV) Court was created to streamline the judicial process and promote efficiency and victim safety in cases of domestic violence. One would expect this collaboration and concerted effort on improving the justice system for victims of domestic violence would yield faster results than under the traditional system. The data presented here indicate just the opposite: IDV Courts take longer to address motions for civil protective orders, and are not significantly more likely to grant such orders than traditional matrimonial courts. Delays in the civil protective order process suggest that the problem-solving court may not be …
Understanding Csr: An Empirical Study Of Private Self-Regulation, Benedict Sheehy
Understanding Csr: An Empirical Study Of Private Self-Regulation, Benedict Sheehy
Benedict Sheehy
Abstract: The article is a study of an important burgeoning form of regulation—private self-regulation—in the area of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Rather than taking a purely theoretical approach or a social scientific study relying publicly reported data, the article addresses the issue by way of interview based case studies. As a study in regulation it clarifies the difference between various types of self-regulation, trade associations’ codes as private self-regulation and government sponsored self-regulation. This distinction hampers efforts to understand the important aspects of motivation and compliance. This study provides empirical examination of compliance in private self-regulation. Given the impact and …
The Invisible Man: How The Sex Offender Registry Results In Social Death, Elizabeth B. Megale
The Invisible Man: How The Sex Offender Registry Results In Social Death, Elizabeth B. Megale
Elizabeth B. Megale
This Article establishes that overcriminalization serves to marginalize unwanted groups of society, and particularly regarding the sex offender registry, it results in social death. The author relies upon the notion of crime as a social construct to establish that the concept of “sex offense” changes over time as society and culture evolve. From there, the author incorporates the work of Michele Foucault involving the relationship of power, knowledge, and sexuality to show how the trend toward more repressive social controls over sex-related activity is related to a shift in this relationship. The Author identifies three characteristics and the associated traits …
Teaching Values, Teaching Stereotypes: Sex Ed And Indoctrination In Public Schools, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Teaching Values, Teaching Stereotypes: Sex Ed And Indoctrination In Public Schools, Jennifer S. Hendricks
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
Many sex education curricula currently used in public schools indoctrinate students in gender stereotypes. As expressed in the title of one article: “If You Don’t Aim to Please, Don’t Dress to Tease,” and Other Public School Sex Education Lessons Subsidized by You, the Federal Taxpayer (Jennifer L. Greenblatt, 14 TEX. J. ON C.L. & C.R. 1 (2008)). Other lessons pertain not only to responsibility for sexual activity but to lifelong approaches to family life and individual achievement. One lesson, for example, instructs students that, in marriage, men need sex from their wives and women need financial support from their husbands. …
Of Woman Born? Technology, Relationship, And The Right To A Human Mother, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Of Woman Born? Technology, Relationship, And The Right To A Human Mother, Jennifer S. Hendricks
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
This article explores the legal implications of a scientific fantasy: the fantasy of building artificial wombs that could gestate a human child from conception. It takes as its touchstone a claim by sociologist Barbara Katz Rothman, who writes, “Every human child has a right to a human mother.”
While the article discusses the legal principles that would apply to artificial wombs, it is skeptical about the technological possibility of artificial wombs in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the focus of the article is the effect that the fantasy of artificial gestation has on the legal discourse around pregnancy and reproduction today. …
Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores equality-based arguments for abortion rights, revealing both their necessity and their pitfalls. It first uses the narrowness of the “health exception” to abortion regulations to show why equality arguments are needed—because our legal tradition's conception of liberty is based on male experience, and we have no theory of basic human rights grounded in women's reproductive experiences. Next, however, the Article shows that equality arguments, although necessary, can undermine women's reproductive freedom because they require that pregnancy and abortion be analogized to male experiences. The result is that equality arguments focus on either the bodily or the social …
Development Lending To Municipalities By The World Bank Group, Asheesh Bhalla
Development Lending To Municipalities By The World Bank Group, Asheesh Bhalla
Asheesh Bhalla
The World Bank Group has recently shifted its development lending policies to have a greater focus on lending to municipalities and developing financial institutions and systems of market creation at the local level. The author reviews this policy shift, and the consequences of such policy changes on local government institutions and law.
Safeguarding The Safeguards: The Extension Of Structural Protection To Non-Fundamental Liberties, Abigail R. Moncrieff
Safeguarding The Safeguards: The Extension Of Structural Protection To Non-Fundamental Liberties, Abigail R. Moncrieff
Abigail R. Moncrieff
As the lawsuits challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) have evolved, one feature of the litigation has proven especially rankling to the legal academy: the incorporation of substantive libertarian concerns into the structural federalism analysis. The breadth and depth of scholarly criticism is surprising, however, given that judges frequently choose indirect methods, including structural and process-based methods of the kinds at issue in the ACA litigation, for protecting substantive constitutional values. Indeed, indirection in the protection of constitutional liberties is a well-known and well-theorized strategy, which one scholar recently termed “semisubstantive review” and another recently theorized as …
Does 'Sorry' Incriminate? Evidence, Harm And The Meaning Of Apologies, Jeffrey S. Helmreich
Does 'Sorry' Incriminate? Evidence, Harm And The Meaning Of Apologies, Jeffrey S. Helmreich
Jeffrey S. Helmreich
Apology has proven a dramatically effective means of resolving conflict and preventing litigation. Still, many injurers, particularly physicians, withhold apologies because they have long been used as evidence of liability. Recently, a majority of states in the U.S. have passed “Apology Laws” designed to lift this disincentive, by shielding apologies from evidentiary use. However, most of the new laws protect only expressions of benevolence and sympathy (such as “I feel bad about what happened to you”). They exclude full apologies, which express regret, remorse or self-criticism (“I should have prevented it,” for example). The state measures thereby reinforce a prevailing …
(Dis)Owning Religious Speech, Jessie Hill
(Dis)Owning Religious Speech, Jessie Hill
Jessie Hill
To claims of a right to equal citizenship, one of the primary responses has long been to assert the right of private property. It is therefore somewhat troubling that, in two recent cases involving public displays of religious symbolism, the Supreme Court embraced property law and rhetoric when faced with the claims of minority religious speakers for inclusion and equality. The first, Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, is a free speech case in which the defendant evaded a finding that it was discriminating against the plaintiff’s religious speech by claiming a government speech defense. In the process, it claimed as …
The Feud Between The Queen And The Diva: How A Property Dispute Underscores The Relevance Of A South Beach Gay Bar, Justin Karr
The Feud Between The Queen And The Diva: How A Property Dispute Underscores The Relevance Of A South Beach Gay Bar, Justin Karr
Justin Karr
The article recounts how the gay community was instrumental in the economic and cultural revival of South Beach as its known today. But, with the area currently experiencing a decline in gay tourism, the article suggests why the city is keen to observe the cultural and social benefit provided by a robust gay population. The article details the bar’s lobby of the local government for an expansion of its outdoor drag entertainment, despite the protests of the neighboring boutique hotel, which the bar asserts is homophobic intolerance of the shows’ gay theme.
The article discusses the importance that the modern …
The Right To Learn: Intellectual Honesty And The First Amendment, Jeffrey M. Cohen
The Right To Learn: Intellectual Honesty And The First Amendment, Jeffrey M. Cohen
Jeffrey M. Cohen
Science education is one of the most hotly contested issues in public debate. Even after decades of jurisprudence and scholarly analysis, politicians still ignite public passions by suggesting that creationism or intelligent design theory be taught alongside of evolution in public school science classrooms. Despite political rhetoric, the Establishment Clause has been steadfastly used to prevent religion masquerading as science from entering the science classroom. However, public officials have launched attacks recently on other scientific theories, such as climate change, that are not religiously motivated. Students are left in these instances without resort to the Establishment Clause and are potentially …
Safeguarding The Safeguards: The Aca Litigation And The Extension Of Structural Protection To Non-Fundamental Liberties, Abigail R. Moncrieff
Safeguarding The Safeguards: The Aca Litigation And The Extension Of Structural Protection To Non-Fundamental Liberties, Abigail R. Moncrieff
Abigail R. Moncrieff
This article confronts and challenges an emerging scholarly consensus that criticizes the hybridization of substantive and structural arguments in the litigation over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Although there is no doubt that the ACA plaintiffs have requested and the ACA judges have provided a hybrid substantive-structural holding, there is nothing at all unusual about this indirect strategy for protecting constitutional liberty interests; it is a well-known and well-theorized strategy, which one scholar recently termed “semisubstantive review.” The article considers three possible distinctions between the ACA case and the ordinary case of semisubstantive review, and concludes that …
The Geography Of Sexuality, Yishai Blank, Issi Rosen-Zvi
The Geography Of Sexuality, Yishai Blank, Issi Rosen-Zvi
Yishai Blank
Who regulates sexuality in America? Given the high salience of federal laws and policies such as the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and the military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy, and states’ legal activism regarding same-sex marriage, it would seem that sexuality is mostly a federal and a state matter, and that cities play a secondary, if not insignificant role. This Article argues that in fact the opposite is true: the regulation of sexuality has been decentralized, with cities being the main locus where the most important issues pertaining to the lives of gays and lesbians are decided. This “localization …
Chevron As A Doctrine Of Hard Cases, Frederick Liu
Chevron As A Doctrine Of Hard Cases, Frederick Liu
Frederick Liu
The conventional wisdom holds that the Chevron doctrine rests on a presumption about congressional intent—a presumption that when a statute is ambiguous, Congress intended the gap to be filled by the agency charged with administering the statute. But the presumption is a mere fiction; Congress generally has no view on whether ambiguities in a statute should be resolved by the agency or the court. This Article proposes a new theory of Chevron, one that rests on a simple reality: No matter how determinate the law may seem, there will inevitably be hard cases—cases in which the law runs out before …
Ada And The Internet: Standardizing The Accessibility Of Web Sites, Laura Corcoran
Ada And The Internet: Standardizing The Accessibility Of Web Sites, Laura Corcoran
Laura Corcoran
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently considering what standards should be applied to commercial web sites to make online information and services accessible to people with disabilities. Should the overall performance of a website be the measuring standard, or would compliance with technical rules be a sufficient measure of web accessibility?
There are dangers in adopting technical standards in DOJ regulations. The process of updating regulations is slow and will not keep pace with changing technology. Accessibility issues involving detailed technical standards would likely deteriorate into battles about computer programming techniques. Compliance with technical standards does not necessarily guarantee …