Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Litigation (20)
- Courts (8)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Torts (4)
-
- Administrative Law (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (2)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (2)
- Asian Studies (1)
- Business (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Civil and Environmental Engineering (1)
- Climate (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Economics (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (18)
- Selected Works (9)
- Association of American Law Schools (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of New Mexico (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- Syracuse University (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- John B McArthur (11)
- Journal of Legal Education (6)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles (3)
- Thomas J. Stipanowich (3)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (2)
- Native American Water Rights Settlement Project (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Ben Depoorter (1)
- Bernadette Bollas Genetin (1)
- Beth Thornburg (1)
- Brendan O. Baggot (1)
- College of Law - Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Curtis E.A. Karnow (1)
- David S. Almeling (1)
- Denis Binder (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (1)
- Human Rights Brief (1)
- John Wade (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Student Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 70
Full-Text Articles in Law
Crow Water Rights Settlement Act Of 2010, United States 111th Congress
Crow Water Rights Settlement Act Of 2010, United States 111th Congress
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Federal Legislation: Title IV: Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement - Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement of 2010 in the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 (PL111-291| 124 Stat 3097). The Act ratifies, authorizes, and confirms the water rights 1999 Compact between the Crow Tribe and MT. The DOI Secretary shall promptly execute the Compact and comply with applicable environmental acts and regulations. The Act provides for: 1) the Tribe to a) rehabilitate and improve the Crow Irrigation Project; and b) Reclamation to construct the municipal, rural, and industrial water system; 2) creates a Project Management Committee made up of the Tribe, …
Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Of 2010, United States 111th Congress
Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Of 2010, United States 111th Congress
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Federal Legislation: Claims Resolution Act of 2010, Title V: Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement of 2010 (Sec. 501) Parties: Pueblo of Taos, NM, US, Town of Taos, El Prado Water & Sanitation District, Acequia Madre del Rio Lucero y del Arroyo Seco, Acequia Madre del Prado, Acequia del Monte, Acequia Madre del Rio Chiquito, Upper Ranchitos Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Assn, Upper Arroyo Hondo Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Assn, Llano Quemado Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Assn. Federal Legislation to approve, ratify, and confirm the Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement; to authorize and direct the Secretary to execute the …
How A Changing Nation Is Fueling The Rise Of Trade Secret Litigation, David S. Almeling
How A Changing Nation Is Fueling The Rise Of Trade Secret Litigation, David S. Almeling
David S. Almeling
Reports of pilfered trade secrets have grown increasingly common, and as recent studies demonstrate, trade secret litigation is on the rise. A 2010 study of the federal courts shows that trade secret litigation has grown exponentially while litigation in general has decreased. And a 2011 study of state courts shows that trade secret litigation is increasing at a faster rate than the rate of litigation in general. This essay asks: Why? Why is trade secret litigation more prevalent than ever? This essay posits — for the first time — explanations for the fact that trade secrets are increasingly important to …
Growing Up With Animal Law: From Courtrooms To Casebooks, Bruce A. Wagman
Growing Up With Animal Law: From Courtrooms To Casebooks, Bruce A. Wagman
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Review Essay--The Arc Of Triumph And The Agony Of Defeat: Mexican Americans And The Law, Michael A. Olivas
Review Essay--The Arc Of Triumph And The Agony Of Defeat: Mexican Americans And The Law, Michael A. Olivas
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Out Of Range: Why The Constitution Can't End The Battle Over Guns, By Mark V. Tushnet, Dennis A. Henigan
Book Review Of Out Of Range: Why The Constitution Can't End The Battle Over Guns, By Mark V. Tushnet, Dennis A. Henigan
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of The Supreme Court And The American Elite, 1789-2008, By Lucas A. Powe, Jr., Joerg Knipprath
Book Review Of The Supreme Court And The American Elite, 1789-2008, By Lucas A. Powe, Jr., Joerg Knipprath
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Slides: Engaging Stakeholders, Duane Zavadil
Slides: Engaging Stakeholders, Duane Zavadil
Opportunities and Obstacles to Reducing the Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Development in Uintah Basin (October 14)
Presenter: Duane Zavadil, Bill Barrett Corporation
5 slides
Reinventing The Eeoc, Nancy M. Modesitt
Reinventing The Eeoc, Nancy M. Modesitt
All Faculty Scholarship
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has struggled to be a meaningful force in eradicating employment discrimination since its inception. The primary reasons for this are structural in nature. The EEOC was designed to react to discrimination complaints by investigating and conciliating all of the thousands of complaints filed annually. The EEOC has never been able to investigate all these complaints despite using the vast majority of its resources attempting to do so. The devotion of resources to managing and investigating the huge volume of complaints prevents the EEOC from taking more effective steps to eliminate discrimination. This article proposes …
Helping Good Lawyers Help Clients Make Good Decisions About Dispute Resolution, John M. Lande
Helping Good Lawyers Help Clients Make Good Decisions About Dispute Resolution, John M. Lande
Faculty Publications
Counseling clients about dispute resolution options is easier said than done. These can be complex and difficult decisions, and lawyers may not have appropriate resources to help lawyers counsel clients in choosing dispute resolution options. While establishing rules requiring this kind of training may help to remedy this shortcoming, perhaps the most promising involves using dispute systems design (DSD) procedures to establish better ways of training lawyers to counsel clients.
The Intel And Microsoft Settlements, Robert H. Lande
The Intel And Microsoft Settlements, Robert H. Lande
All Faculty Scholarship
This article briefly compares and contrasts the recent U.S. Federal Trade Commission's antitrust settlement with Intel, and the antitrust cases brought against Microsoft. The article praises the FTC's settlement with Intel, and predicts that history will judge it very favorably compared to the settlement by the U.S. Department of Justice of its antitrust case against Microsoft.
A Vaguely Jocular Guide To In Limine Motions, Curtis E.A. Karnow
A Vaguely Jocular Guide To In Limine Motions, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Curtis E.A. Karnow
A short review of problematic in limine (pre trial) motions
Survey: Woman And California Law, Amy C. Hirschkron, Michele M. Feher, Te Jung Chang
Survey: Woman And California Law, Amy C. Hirschkron, Michele M. Feher, Te Jung Chang
Golden Gate University Law Review
This survey of California, a regular feature of the Women's Law Forum, summarizes recent California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal decisions of special importance to women. A brief analysis of the issues pertinent to women raised in each case is provided.
A Decision Procedure For Making And Evaluating Ccp 998 Offers, Ryan J. Vlasak
A Decision Procedure For Making And Evaluating Ccp 998 Offers, Ryan J. Vlasak
Ryan J Vlasak
This paper puts forth a decision procedure for making and evaluating offers to compromise pursuant to CCP section 998.
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
Growing Pains; Building Arbitration's Legitimacy Through Everyday Arbitral Decisions, John B. Mcarthur
John B McArthur
Arbitration’s rapid growth has come under pressure in recent years. A Supreme Court decision holding that awards under the Federal Arbitration Act cannot be vacated for substantive error even if they clearly are wrong has helped discredit arbitration. Misuse of arbitration clauses in consumer, employment, and franchise settings has led to proposals for radical constriction under the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009. Facing these challenges, arbitrators need to ensure the quality of their awards by adhering to the rule of law and resisting the temptation to administer a personal brand of justice. They need to discourage silent awards and …
Jurors In The Digital Age, Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Jurors In The Digital Age, Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Thaddeus Hoffmeister
ABSTRACT: Improper use of new technology by jurors inside and outside the courtroom has become so pervasive that commentators have coined new phrases to describe it: “Google Mistrials,” the “Twitter Effect,” and “Internet-Tainted Jurors.” Yet, despite the attention garnered, few legal scholars, to date, have examined this area in-depth. The articles addressing this topic primarily focus on the benefits of technology and how to harness it to aid in juror comprehension. This dearth of legal scholarship may be due in large part to the fact that the Digital Age is fairly new and still evolving and juror misconduct is historically …
Making Wto Remedies Work For Developing Nations: The Need For Class Actions, Phoenix X. Cai
Making Wto Remedies Work For Developing Nations: The Need For Class Actions, Phoenix X. Cai
Phoenix X. Cai
Making WTO Remedies Work for Developing Nations: The Need for Class Actions
Abstract
Developing nations comprise more than four-fifths of the membership of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”). Yet, they seldom participate in the WTO’s powerful dispute settlement process. This is problematic because the WTO is essentially a self-enforcing system of reciprocal trade rights that relies on proactive monitoring and enforcement by all members. Use of the self-enforcement mechanism – by initiating cases under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (“DSU”) - is critical.
There are five primary reasons why developing nations do not actively invoke the DSU. This Article argues …
A Populist Manifesto For Learning The Law, Eric E. Johnson
A Populist Manifesto For Learning The Law, Eric E. Johnson
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
What Is Probable Cause, And Why Should We Care?: The Costs, Benefits, And Meaning Of Individualized Suspicion, Andrew E. Taslitz
What Is Probable Cause, And Why Should We Care?: The Costs, Benefits, And Meaning Of Individualized Suspicion, Andrew E. Taslitz
Law and Contemporary Problems
Taslitz defines probable cause as having four components: one quantitative, one qualitative, one temporal, and one moral. He focuses on the last of these components. "Individualized suspicion," the US Supreme Court has suggested, is perhaps the most important of the four components of probable cause. That is a position with which he heartily agree. The other three components each play only a supporting role. But individualized suspicion is the beating heart that gives probable cause its vitality.
Material Contribution To Justice - Toxic Causation After Resurfice Corp. V. Hanke, Lynda M. Collins, Heather Mcleod-Kilmurray
Material Contribution To Justice - Toxic Causation After Resurfice Corp. V. Hanke, Lynda M. Collins, Heather Mcleod-Kilmurray
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
The vast universe of chemicals in the Canadian environment is presently understood only poorly by science. For many thousands of chemicals, important data regarding chronic toxicity are lacking. As a result, the requirement that the plaintiff in a negligence action prove causation of illness on a but-for standard has frequently been unattainable. In Resurfice Corp. v. Hanke, the Supreme Court of Canada articulated an important exception to the but-for test. In circumstances where but-for causation is unprovable due to limits in scientific knowledge, proof that a defendant materially contributed to the plaintiff's risk of incurring the type of injury that …