Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 4th amendment (1)
- 5th amendment (1)
- Alleged perpetrators (1)
- Authority (1)
- Civil rights (1)
-
- Constitutional issues (1)
- Constitutional protections (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal courts (1)
- Cross-Examination (1)
- Defendant (1)
- Deportation proceedings (1)
- Detention (1)
- Due process rights (1)
- Enemy combatants (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- General negligence standard (1)
- Government agent (1)
- INS (1)
- Immigrants (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration courts (1)
- Immigration hearings (1)
- Immigration law (1)
- Immigration respondents (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Crossing Over: Why Attorneys (And Judges) Should Not Be Able To Cross-Examine Witnesses Regarding Their Immigration Statuses For Impeachment Purposes, Colin Miller
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Searching For Remedial Paradigms: Human Rights In The Age Of Terrorism, Frances Howell Rudko
Searching For Remedial Paradigms: Human Rights In The Age Of Terrorism, Frances Howell Rudko
Faculty Publications
Nine years after the unprecedented terrorist attacks on September 11, judicial response to various governmental and individual methods of combating terrorism remains deferential and restrained. The courts have heard at least three types of cases brought by advocates for three distinct groups: the alleged perpetrators of terrorism; the victims of terrorist attacks; and third party humanitarian groups. Implicit in the practical question of how to deal effectively with terrorism is the broader consideration which Congress, the President and others must also address: how to respond to the terrorists' extreme human rights violations without violating international humanitarian law.
The Exclusionary Rule In Immigration Proceedings: Where It Was, Where It Is, Where It May Be Going, Irene Scharf
The Exclusionary Rule In Immigration Proceedings: Where It Was, Where It Is, Where It May Be Going, Irene Scharf
Faculty Publications
The case alerted me to the continuing issue concerning the treatment of alleged violations of Fourth Amendment rights in immigration court, with this article the result of research conducted relating thereto. Beyond reviewing the relevant views of the federal courts of appeals; the administrative tribunal that handles appeals of immigration court cases, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA); and even local immigration courts; I consider whether the jurisprudence has remained static since the Supreme Court's watershed opinion on the issue about twenty-five years ago. I also offer suggestions as to how to effectively, fairly, and efficiently resolve the issues raised …