Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Pleading (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Iqbal (2)
- Twombly (2)
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Applying law to facts (1)
- Biography (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Clark (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Common law civil law convergence (1)
- Common law pleading (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Conley (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Cultural cognition (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Docketology (1)
- Empirical analysis (1)
- Fact Pleading (1)
- Fact pleading (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Federal Rule 23 (1)
- Federal Rules (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Federal common law (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- German (1)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Pleading And Access To Civil Procedure: Historical And Comparative Reflections On Iqbal, A Day In Court And A Decision According To Law, James Maxeiner
Pleading And Access To Civil Procedure: Historical And Comparative Reflections On Iqbal, A Day In Court And A Decision According To Law, James Maxeiner
All Faculty Scholarship
The Iqbal decision confirms the breakdown of contemporary American civil procedure. We know what civil procedure should do, and we know that our civil procedure is not doing it. Civil procedure should facilitate determining rights according to law. It should help courts and parties apply law to facts accurately, fairly, expeditiously and efficiently. This article reflects on three historic American system failures and reports a foreign success story.
Pleadings can help courts do what we know courts should do: decide case on the merits, accurately, fairly, expeditiously and efficiently. Pleadings facilitate a day in court when focused on deciding according …
Redeeming The Missed Opportunities Of Shady Grove, Stephen B. Burbank, Tobias Barrington Wolff
Redeeming The Missed Opportunities Of Shady Grove, Stephen B. Burbank, Tobias Barrington Wolff
All Faculty Scholarship
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co., a closely watched case decided in the 2009–10 Term, presented the Court with an opportunity to speak to two related problems under the Rules Enabling Act that have languished for decades without proper resolution. The first involves a broad interpretive question: How can the limitations on rulemaking authority contained in the Act be applied in a manner that reflects the separation-of-powers concerns that animated them while also exhibiting respect for the state regulatory arrangements that govern much of our economic and social activity? The second problem involves the intersection of the …
Sovereign Litigants: Native American Nations In Court, Catherine T. Struve
Sovereign Litigants: Native American Nations In Court, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Quasi-Preemption: Nervous Breakdown In Our Constitutional System, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Quasi-Preemption: Nervous Breakdown In Our Constitutional System, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Disputing Limited Liability, Christina L. Boyd, David A. Hoffman
Disputing Limited Liability, Christina L. Boyd, David A. Hoffman
All Faculty Scholarship
This project presents six years of hand-collected federal district court data to analyze the first representative sample of veil piercing litigation. Our method identifies veil piercing complaints through Westlaw's trial pleadings database and codes each case through a detailed examination of PACER records. We test a variety of hypotheses to understand how such litigations are resolved. We find that plaintiffs succeed quite often in veil piercing litigation, if success is defined as winning on motions that do not terminate a case. A variety of legal and extra-legal factors predict such interstitial veil piercing successes. Voluntary creditor causes of action promote …
A Wise Man Of The Law, Anthony J. Scirica
A Wise Man Of The Law, Anthony J. Scirica
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Pleading Problem In Antitrust Cases And Beyond, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
The Pleading Problem In Antitrust Cases And Beyond, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
In its Twombly decision the Supreme Court held that an antitrust complaint failed because its allegations did not include enough “factual matter” to justify proceeding to discovery. Two years later the Court extended this new pleading standard to federal complaints generally. Twombly’s broad language has led to a broad rewriting of federal pleading doctrine.
Naked market division conspiracies such as the one pled in Twombly must be kept secret because antitrust enforcers will prosecute them when they are detected. This inherent secrecy, which the Supreme Court did not discuss, has dire consequences for pleading if too much factual specificity …
Summary Judgment, Pleading, And The Future Of Transsubstantive Procedure, Stephen B. Burbank
Summary Judgment, Pleading, And The Future Of Transsubstantive Procedure, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Time And The Courts: What Deadlines And Their Treatment Tell Us About The Litigation System, Catherine T. Struve
Time And The Courts: What Deadlines And Their Treatment Tell Us About The Litigation System, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Shifting Burdens: Discrimination Law Through The Lens Of Jury Instructions, Catherine T. Struve
Shifting Burdens: Discrimination Law Through The Lens Of Jury Instructions, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
This Term, in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held the Price Waterhouse burden-shifting framework inapplicable to Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) claims. This Article finds the Gross Court’s rationales for repudiating Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins unpersuasive. Although the crux of the Court’s argument is that it is too confusing to instruct a jury on the burden-shifting framework, in actuality, there is no evidence that burden-shifting instructions are unduly confusing. In fact, Gross will exacerbate a different sort of confusion: that which arises when a jury must resolve two claims under different burden frameworks. At …
Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.: Scholar, Law Reformer, Teacher, And Mentor, Catherine T. Struve
Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.: Scholar, Law Reformer, Teacher, And Mentor, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Procedure As Palimpsest, Catherine T. Struve
Foreword: Procedure As Palimpsest, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
It's The Law! Applying The Law Is The Missing Measure Of Civil Law / Common Law Convergence, James Maxeiner
It's The Law! Applying The Law Is The Missing Measure Of Civil Law / Common Law Convergence, James Maxeiner
All Faculty Scholarship
It’s the Law! The application of law to facts is a measure of convergence of common and civil law systems of civil procedure that is missing from our program. The previous session addressed “Getting Straight to the Facts” and “Getting Results.” Facts and results are fine, but what of the law and of its application? Should not applying law have pride of place in systems of civil justice? Should not it be the measure of convergence?
The measure of convergence that I propose is whether methods of applying law to facts are converging. Applying law to facts is the principal …