Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Military, War, and Peace (6)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Courts (3)
-
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Torts (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- European Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Keyword
-
- Afghanistan (3)
- Iraq (3)
- United States (3)
- Armed conflict (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
-
- Eighth Amendment (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Race (2)
- SOFA (2)
- Standing (2)
- Texas (2)
- 10(b) (1)
- 10b-5 (1)
- 10b5-1 (1)
- 10b5-2 (1)
- 1993 Constitution (1)
- 2010 (1)
- Abstention (1)
- Additional protocol (1)
- Adversarial vs. inquisitorial (1)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal (1)
- Assignment (1)
- Australia (1)
- Baited ambush (1)
- Baze v. Rees (1)
- Board Primacy (1)
- CIA (1)
- Case Management (1)
- Charitable trust (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 56
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Quad (The 2010 Alumni Magazine), Southern Methodist University, Dedman School Of Law
The Quad (The 2010 Alumni Magazine), Southern Methodist University, Dedman School Of Law
The Quad (Law Alumni Magazine), 1988-present
• The Luxembourg Supreme Court Summit
• Rule of Law Forum: Indonesia
• International Summit on the Law and Business of Video Games
• Methods of Interpretation: How the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution
• Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum
Regis W. Campfield: Friend And Colleague, Christopher H. Hanna
Regis W. Campfield: Friend And Colleague, Christopher H. Hanna
SMU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Frederick C. Moss, Or, The Education Of A Junior Colleague, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Professor Frederick C. Moss, Or, The Education Of A Junior Colleague, Jeffrey D. Kahn
SMU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Texas Mis-Step: Why The Largest Child Removal In Modern U.S. History Failed, Jessica Dixon Weaver
The Texas Mis-Step: Why The Largest Child Removal In Modern U.S. History Failed, Jessica Dixon Weaver
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article sets forth the historical and legal reasons as to how the State of Texas botched the removal of 439 children from the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints parents residing in Eldorado, Texas. The Department of Family and Protective Services in Texas overreached its authority by treating this case like a class-action removal based on an impermissible legal argument, rather than focusing on the facts and circumstances that could have been substantiated for a select group of children at risk. This impermissible legal argument regarding the “pervasive belief system” of a polygamist sect that allowed minor …
A Sense Of Duty: The Illusory Criminal Jurisdiction Of The U.S./Iraq Status Of Forces Agreement, Chris Jenks
A Sense Of Duty: The Illusory Criminal Jurisdiction Of The U.S./Iraq Status Of Forces Agreement, Chris Jenks
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between the U.S. and Iraq entered force on January 1, 2009 and established the legal framework by which U.S. personnel continue to operate in Iraq. The SOFA followed lengthy and contentious negotiations, which many commentators claim that Iraq “won,” extracting significant concessions from the U.S. in the process. While that may true in some areas, the opposite seems to be the case in one of the most contentious areas of this or any SOFA – criminal jurisdiction over service members. This article examines the criminal jurisdiction article of the Iraq SOFA and posits that …
The Endogeniety Problem In Cost-Benefit Analysis, Gregory S. Crespi
The Endogeniety Problem In Cost-Benefit Analysis, Gregory S. Crespi
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Cost-benefit analysis, an important technique in American public sector decision-making, is used to assess policies through aggregating the estimated willingness to pay of the affected persons to enjoy the benefits or avoid the burdens of those policies. Such analyses are generally based on the implicit simplifying assumptions that both the preferences of existing persons and the genetic identities of the persons who will comprise future generations are exogenous with respect to that policy. If, however, some persons’ preferences are endogenous in that they are altered by a policy, which is often the case, then this exogenous preferences assumption will introduce …
Fred Moss, The Law School's Unsung Hero, C. Paul Rogers Iii
Fred Moss, The Law School's Unsung Hero, C. Paul Rogers Iii
SMU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Managerial Judge Goes To Trial, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
The Managerial Judge Goes To Trial, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Scholars have examined the phenomenon of pre-trial judicial management, but have ignored the ways in which this problematic set of attitudes has invaded the trial phase of litigation. This article examines the use of managerial discretion at the trial stage and demonstrates that trial-phase managerial decisions suffer from all the problems of their pre-trial counterparts: 1) trial management involves judges so intimately in the parties’ information and strategies that it may compromise the judges’ impartiality; 2) it leads to a loss of transparency as more decisions are made off the record or in chambers; 3) management decisions are not guided …
Patent Fraud, David O. Taylor
Patent Fraud, David O. Taylor
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Several recent judicial opinions suggest that patent law’s inequitable conduct doctrine is broken. These opinions indicate that - despite its admirable objective of encouraging disclosure of important information to the Patent Office - the inequitable conduct defense is being over-used by alleged infringers in patent litigation to the detriment of the public. This over-use creates problems. First, it encourages over-disclosure of information to the Patent Office. In extreme cases, over-disclosure makes it difficult for patent examiners to identify information critical to deciding whether to issue patents, potentially resulting in the issuance of invalid patents. Second, over-use of the inequitable conduct …
Green Cards For Foreign House Buyers: A Way To Help Stabilize Housing Prices, Gregory S. Crespi
Green Cards For Foreign House Buyers: A Way To Help Stabilize Housing Prices, Gregory S. Crespi
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The continuing decline in US housing prices is making it difficult to effectively address our nation’s financial and economic problems. Any measures that would serve to help stabilize housing prices without requiring substantial government expenditures merit serious consideration. Richard Lefrak and Gary Shilling have recently set forth in the Wall Street Journal the broad outlines of a proposed change in immigration law that would confer conditional residency and eventually permanent residency upon foreign purchasers of US houses. In this article I present and discuss a modified version of their proposal that is more comprehensive and that seeks to avoid the …
How Recognizing The Endogeneity Of Identity Renders The Discounting Debate Largely Irrelevant, Gregory S. Crespi
How Recognizing The Endogeneity Of Identity Renders The Discounting Debate Largely Irrelevant, Gregory S. Crespi
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Many social policies require the substantial commitment of resources in order to provide benefits for future generations. Conventional policy assessment by the usual willingness to pay valuation criterion raises the issues of whether the future benefits of a policy should first be discounted to a smaller present value before comparison with its current costs in order to assess its merits, and if so then what discount rate should be utilized for these calculations. There is, however, less at stake in this debate than the partisans on either side commonly realize. This is because of the failure of policy analysts to …
Judging Cruelty, Meghan J. Ryan
Judging Cruelty, Meghan J. Ryan
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
he wisdom of the death penalty has recently come under attack in a number of states. This raises the question of whether states’ retreat from the death penalty, or other punishments, will pressure other states - either politically or constitutionally - to similarly abandon the punishment. Politically, states may succumb to the trend of discontinuing a punishment. Constitutionally, states may be forced to surrender the punishment if it is considered cruel, and, as a result of a large number of states renouncing it, the punishment also becomes unusual. If a punishment is thus found to be both cruel and unusual, …
Should Charitable Trust Enforcement Rights Be Assignable?, Joshua C. Tate
Should Charitable Trust Enforcement Rights Be Assignable?, Joshua C. Tate
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
In recent years, scholars have given much attention to the problem of charitable trust enforcement. Departing from the common law, section 405(c) of the Uniform Trust Code provides that “[t]he settlor of a charitable trust, among others, may maintain a proceeding to enforce the trust.” This Article addresses the question of whether, and to what extent, a settlor’s right to enforce a charitable trust should be assignable to third parties. Should the law permit the settlor of a charitable trust to assign her enforcement rights after the creation of the trust, or should assignments be recognized only if they are …
The Future Of Oil And Gas Law, John S. Lowe
The Future Of Oil And Gas Law, John S. Lowe
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Author’s thesis is simple: Oil and gas jurisprudence has a bright future. We live in a hydrocarbons world, and our economic system is not going to change dramatically overnight; we will continue to live in a world powered and heated by hydrocarbons for at least the next twenty years. In fact, world demand for oil and gas is likely to increase substantially. From the turn of the twenty-first century until mid-2008, the world watched as oil prices first inched upwards and then surged. The high energy costs that energized us until a year and a half ago (and that appear …
A Hole In The Need Of Mending: Copyright And The Individual Marking Of Advertisements Published In Collective Works, Randy Gordon
A Hole In The Need Of Mending: Copyright And The Individual Marking Of Advertisements Published In Collective Works, Randy Gordon
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Shareholder Democracy And The Curious Turn Toward Board Primacy, Grant M. Hayden, Matthew T. Bodie
Shareholder Democracy And The Curious Turn Toward Board Primacy, Grant M. Hayden, Matthew T. Bodie
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Corporate law is consumed with a debate over shareholder democracy. The conventional wisdom counsels that shareholders should have more voice in corporate governance, in order to reduce agency costs and provide democratic legitimacy. A second set of theorists, described as “board primacists,” advocates against greater shareholder democracy and in favor of increased board discretion. These theorists argue that shareholders need to delegate their authority in order to provide the board with the proper authority to manage the enterprise and avoid short-term decision making.
In the last few years, the classical economic underpinnings of corporate law have been destabilized by a …
Abstention: The Unexpected Power Of Withholding Your Vote, Grant M. Hayden
Abstention: The Unexpected Power Of Withholding Your Vote, Grant M. Hayden
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article examines the effect of abstentions on the outcome of votes. Scholars (and voters) operate under two basic assumptions about the nature of abstention. First, they assume that an abstention affects all alternatives in equal measure. Second, and relatedly, people assume that a voter’s preferred alternative will be less likely to win if that voter abstains (and, of course, more likely to win if she votes). Removing the potential full support of a vote and replacing it with the fifty-fifty proposition of an abstention should hurt the chances of a voter’s preferred alternative. These two assumptions guide the thinking …
Civil Rites: The Gay Marriage Controversy In Historical Perspective, Joanna L. Grossman
Civil Rites: The Gay Marriage Controversy In Historical Perspective, Joanna L. Grossman
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This short essay, written for a volume that celebrates and reflects on Lawrence M. Friedman’s work in legal history and legal culture, explores the modern controversy about same-sex marriage through a historical lens. The legalization of same-sex marriage by five states, and the express condemnation of it by more than forty others, has reintroduced the age-old problem of non-uniform marriage laws and the complicated interactions that follow. This modern story - a challenge to traditional marriage, a divisive moral debate, and the emergence of strong oppositional forces that are stuck, at least temporarily, but perhaps indefinitely, in a kind of …
Recalibrating The Legal Risks Of Cross-Border Health Care, Nathan Cortez
Recalibrating The Legal Risks Of Cross-Border Health Care, Nathan Cortez
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The nascent scholarship surrounding "medical tourism" assumes, without much scrutiny, that foreign jurisdictions provide few legal remedies to patients, instead focusing on whether U.S. patients can sue in U.S. courts. This article tests that assumption by examining whether patients might recover adequate compensation not only in the United States, but in four common destinations: India, Thailand, Singapore, and Mexico. I analyze how each jurisdiction handles medical malpractice complaints and discuss the unique obstacles patients might face when navigating each of these systems. I conclude that U.S. patients will struggle to recover remotely adequate compensation in each of these jurisdictions. This …
Law, Facts, And Power, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Law, Facts, And Power, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Ashcroft v. Iqbal is wrong in many ways. This essay is about only one of them: the Court’s single-handed return to a pleading system that requires lawyers and judges to distinguish between pleading facts and pleading law. This move not only resuscitates a distinction purposely abandoned by the generation that drafted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but also serves as an example of the very difficulties created by the distinction. The chinks in the law-fact divide are evident in Iqbal itself - both in the already notorious pleading section of the opinion, and in …
The Foreign Commerce Clause, Anthony J. Colangelo
The Foreign Commerce Clause, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article comprehensively addresses Congress’s powers under the Constitution’s Foreign Commerce Clause. Congress has increasingly used the Clause to pass laws of unprecedented and aggressive reach over both domestic and foreign activity. Yet despite the Clause’s mounting significance for modern U.S. regulatory regimes at home and abroad, it remains an incredibly under-analyzed source of constitutional power. Moreover, faced with an increasing number of challenges under the Clause lower courts have been unable to coherently articulate the contours of Congress’s legislative authority. When courts have tried, their efforts have largely been wrong. The Article explains why they have been wrong and …
Legal Ethics In International Criminal Defense, Jenia I. Turner
Legal Ethics In International Criminal Defense, Jenia I. Turner
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This paper examines the new and complex dilemmas facing defense attorneys who represent clients before international criminal courts. It argues that the unique features and goals of international criminal trials demand a distinct approach to resolving some of these ethical dilemmas. In particular, the goals of international trials are broader and often more political than those of ordinary domestic trials, and the applicable procedures are a unique hybrid of the inquisitorial and adversarial traditions. Moreover, some of the justifications for aggressive defense at the domestic level - such as discouraging disengaged advocacy and protesting overly harsh punishments - are less …
A Prolonged Slump For ‘Plaintiff-Pitchers’: The Narrow ‘Strike Zone’ For Securities Plaintiffs In The Fourth Circuit, Marc I. Steinberg, Dustin Appel
A Prolonged Slump For ‘Plaintiff-Pitchers’: The Narrow ‘Strike Zone’ For Securities Plaintiffs In The Fourth Circuit, Marc I. Steinberg, Dustin Appel
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article focuses on the narrow “strike zone” that plaintiffs must overcome in private securities actions instituted in the Fourth Circuit. Based on empirical data generated over a fourteen-year span, there emerges a clear finding that during that time period defendants were victorious in almost all cases, either on the merits of the case or due to procedural obstacles. The authors posit that this pattern of difficulty for plaintiffs arises, at least in part, from the Fourth Circuit’s restrictive interpretation of various requisite elements of these causes of action, such as materiality and scienter, as well as the Fourth Circuit’s …
Blurring The Lines Between Pleading Doctrines: The Enhanced Rule 8(A)(2) Plausibility Pleading Standard Converges With The Heightened Fraud Pleading Standards Under Rule 9(B) And The Pslra, Marc I. Steinberg, Diego E. Gomez-Cornejo
Blurring The Lines Between Pleading Doctrines: The Enhanced Rule 8(A)(2) Plausibility Pleading Standard Converges With The Heightened Fraud Pleading Standards Under Rule 9(B) And The Pslra, Marc I. Steinberg, Diego E. Gomez-Cornejo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article focuses on the Supreme Court’s recent enhancement of Rule 8(a)(2)’s pleading standard to approach the heightened fraud pleading standards under Rule 9(b) and the PSLRA. The authors posit that the introduction of a tacit “probability requirement” into the basic pleading standard impedes the heightened fraud pleading standards under Rule 9(b) and the PSLRA from fulfilling the policy rationales for which they were created. By elevating the basic requirements that must be met in any federal civil case for a complaint to be legally sufficient, the Supreme Court has caused an evident convergence of pleading standards that blurs the …
Introduction: Insider Trading (Oxford University Press 3d Ed.), William K.S. Wang, Marc I. Steinberg
Introduction: Insider Trading (Oxford University Press 3d Ed.), William K.S. Wang, Marc I. Steinberg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This paper is the introductory chapter to Insider Trading (Oxford University Press 3d ed. 2010). This treatise analyzes the application of various laws to stock market insider trading and tipping. Among the federal laws are Exchange Act section 10(b), SEC Rule 10b-5, mail/wire fraud, SEC Rule 14e-3, Exchange Act section 16, and Securities Act section 17(a). The state law discussed is both state common law and a state law claim by the issuer.
Another chapter addresses government enforcement of the insider trading/tipping prohibitions. A chapter on compliance programs deals with how firms can try to prevent illegal insider trading and …
Saving Civil Justice: Judging Civil Justice, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Saving Civil Justice: Judging Civil Justice, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Race, American Law And The State Of Nature, George A. Martinez
Race, American Law And The State Of Nature, George A. Martinez
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article advances a new theoretical framework to help explain and understand race and American law. In particular, the article argues that we can employ a philosophical model to attempt to understand what often occurs when the dominant group deals with persons of color. The article contends that when the dominant group acts with great power or lack of constraint, it often acts as though it were in what political philosophers have called the state of nature. Thus, this article argues that there is a tendency for the dominant group to act as though it were in the state of …
Zoya's Standing Problem, Or, When Should The Constitution Follow The Flag?, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Zoya's Standing Problem, Or, When Should The Constitution Follow The Flag?, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Some federal courts have devised a new test of prudential standing that they use to dismiss suits filed by foreign plaintiffs alleging unlawful conduct by American officials abroad, even when these cases involve matters that may have nothing to do with foreign affairs, national security, or terrorism. Rather than decide the case on its merits or dismiss it on any number of legitimate grounds, the complaint is dismissed because the plaintiff lacks a “prior substantial connection” to the United States.
I identify and critique this strange but proliferating test of standing. First, it is inconsistent with any theoretical view of …
No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em, Or, The Voir Dire In Dallas County, Jeffrey D. Kahn
No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em, Or, The Voir Dire In Dallas County, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Voir dire is Law French for “to speak the truth.” In the United States and a few other common-law countries that still use juries, the term describes the process of selecting jurors who will hear the evidence presented at trial, render a verdict, and sometimes determine punishment. The translation suggests a search for jurors who can render a fair and impartial verdict. Attorneys try to discover and remove jurors who seem unable or unlikely to speak the truth, such as those who nurture irrational prejudices or harbor private grievances.
In most federal courts, the judge is the primary conduit for …
Presentation Of Jeffrey Kahn, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Presentation Of Jeffrey Kahn, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This short essay is based on remarks given at the Kennan Institute at the conference ‘The Russian Constitution at Fifteen: Assessments and Current Challenges to Russia’s Legal Development’. A central focus of these remarks is the undoing of the federal system described in the 1993 Constitution.