Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 4th amendment (1)
- Armed force (1)
- Caste system (1)
- Contractualist (1)
- Cultural inversion (1)
-
- Deborah Post (1)
- Deborah W. Post (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Humanitarian intervention (1)
- Immunity (1)
- John Linarelli (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jury (1)
- Moral justification (1)
- One drop rule (1)
- One-drop rule (1)
- Post (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Racial classification (1)
- Search (1)
- Seizure (1)
- Self governance principle (1)
- Warrant (1)
- When Does Might Make Right? Using Force for Regime Change (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cultural Inversion And The One-Drop Rule: An Essay On Biology, Racial Classification, And The Rhetoric Of Racial Transcendence, Deborah W. Post
Cultural Inversion And The One-Drop Rule: An Essay On Biology, Racial Classification, And The Rhetoric Of Racial Transcendence, Deborah W. Post
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Framers' Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History Of Suspicion & Probable Cause, Fabio Arcila, Jr.
The Framers' Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History Of Suspicion & Probable Cause, Fabio Arcila, Jr.
Scholarly Works
Originalist analyses of the Framers’ views about governmental search power have devoted insufficient attention to the civil search statutes they promulgated for regulatory purposes. What attention has been paid concludes that the Framers were divided about how accessible search remedies should be. This Article explains why this conventional account is mostly wrong and explores the lessons to be learned from the statutory choices the Framers made with regard to search and seizure law. In enacting civil search statutes, the Framers chose to depart from common law standards and instead largely followed the patterns of preceding British civil search statutes. The …
When Does Might Make Right? Using Force For Regime Change, John Linarelli
When Does Might Make Right? Using Force For Regime Change, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
Should states use force to bring about regime change? International law recognizes no such grounds. This paper seeks to provide guidance from moral theory. The aim of this paper is to identify the moral grounds for the use of armed force by one state or a group of states, against another state, when the intention of the intervening states is to achieve a fundamental change in the character of the political and legal institutions of the other state. Lawyers tend to place the argument for regime change intervention within putative humanitarian intervention doctrines. The moral justification for humanitarian intervention is …