Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- 14th amendment (1)
- 1963 (1)
- 1st amendment (1)
- 4th amendment (1)
- Activists (1)
-
- Activity (1)
- Advice (1)
- Advocacy (1)
- Alabama (1)
- Analysis (1)
- Anonymity (1)
- Armed (1)
- Arrests (1)
- Article 14 (1)
- Automobile stops (1)
- Birmingham (1)
- Character (1)
- City officials (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Class exercise (1)
- Clinical (1)
- Clinical approach (1)
- Clinical curriculum (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Conflict of interest (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Critique (1)
- Custodial interrogation (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Power Behind The Promise: Enforcing No Child Left Behind To Improve Education, Amy M. Reichbach
The Power Behind The Promise: Enforcing No Child Left Behind To Improve Education, Amy M. Reichbach
Faculty Publications
Despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recognition in 1954, in Brown v. Board of Education, that education is of paramount importance, six million middle and high school students are still in danger of being left behind. Less than seventy-five percent of eighth graders, fifty percent in urban schools, are graduating from high school within five years. Advocates for educational equity have appealed to the courts, achieving limited success. They have also turned to the legislature, which most recently enacted the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 ("NCLB"). Thus far, however, the federal government has not enforced NCLB adequately. This …
The Role Of The Parent/Guardian In Juvenile Custodial Interrogations: Friend Or Foe?, Hillary B. Farber
The Role Of The Parent/Guardian In Juvenile Custodial Interrogations: Friend Or Foe?, Hillary B. Farber
Faculty Publications
Part II briefly sets out the historical context of juvenile delinquency proceedings before and after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case In re Gault. Part III discusses the two current approaches to assessing the validity of a juvenile's waiver. Part IV examines three inadequacies with the parent/guardian advisor: (1) the standardless approach with which courts assess their appropriateness; (2) the inadequacy with which adults understand Miranda; and (3) the conflicts of interest that arise in this context. Part V analogizes to the abortion and paternity contexts to support the argument that lawyers should act as primary advisors to …
Reflection-In-Action: Lessons Learned From New Clinicians, Justine A. Dunlap, Peter A. Joy
Reflection-In-Action: Lessons Learned From New Clinicians, Justine A. Dunlap, Peter A. Joy
Faculty Publications
Clinical legal education focuses on reflective learning, yet data collected from newer clinical faculty reveal that few schools offer training to assist new clinicians in understanding and incorporating reflective learning techniques as they make the transition from law practice to clinical law teaching. To the extent that training is offered to newer faculty, it may range from ad hoc guidance and informal mentoring to more deliberate programs, which may include periodic meetings devoted primarily to discussing clinical methodology, teaching techniques, and other issues important to newer clinical faculty. Although informal and unstructured approaches to training new clinical faculty may well …
Dr. King, Bull Connor, And Persuasive Narratives, Shaun B. Spencer
Dr. King, Bull Connor, And Persuasive Narratives, Shaun B. Spencer
Faculty Publications
This article describes an in-class exercise that illustrates the use of persuasive narrative techniques in a U.S. Supreme Court decision. The article first describes the background to the Supreme Court’s decision in Walker v. City of Birmingham. Next, the article examines persuasive narrative techniques through the lens of an in-class exercise in which students identify the Justices’ narrative devices and consider how those devices preview the Justices’ legal arguments. Finally, the article describes why the Walker case and the exercise are valuable not only to teach persuasive narratives, but also to raise broader issues of lawyering and social justice.
Nevada Case Threatens To Expand Terry Stops, Shaun B. Spencer
Nevada Case Threatens To Expand Terry Stops, Shaun B. Spencer
Faculty Publications
This term, the U.S. Supreme Court will review a Nevada decision authorizing police to arrest people for refusing to identify themselves. If affirmed, the decision could reshape how privacy is viewed in the criminal context throughout the United States, and could prompt the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to depart from the Supreme Court’s approach to stop-and-frisk cases. The case is Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court, 59 P.3d 1201 (Nev. 2002), cert. granted, 124 S. Ct. 430 (2003).