Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2003

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Torts

William Mitchell Law Review

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Essay: Recent Developments In Minnesota Dram Shop Law, Christopher E. Celichowski, Michael T. Johnson Jan 2003

Essay: Recent Developments In Minnesota Dram Shop Law, Christopher E. Celichowski, Michael T. Johnson

William Mitchell Law Review

Minnesota's Civil Damages Act is a creature of statute without counterpart in common law. The Act, referred to as the “Dram Shop Act,” is highly penal in nature and is intended to provide remedies for damages attributable to commercial lenders' illegal sale of intoxicating liquors. Since the Act's inception more than ninety-two years ago, Minnesota courts traditionally have construed it in a strict fashion. Over its long evolution, the “duet” of legislative action and court interpretation served to clarify several ambiguities within the Act. Despite precise and oftentimes circumstantial application, certain ambiguities remain. The following article will--in the context of …


The Expansion Of Punitive Damages In Minnesota: Environmental Litigation After Jensen V. Walsh , Alexandra B. Klass Jan 2003

The Expansion Of Punitive Damages In Minnesota: Environmental Litigation After Jensen V. Walsh , Alexandra B. Klass

William Mitchell Law Review

This article explains how the law of punitive damages has developed in Minnesota both before and after Jensen, and illustrates the significance of the Jensen case through a detailed discussion of the facts and outcome of the Kennedy Building Associates case. Section II of this article discusses the purpose of punitive damages, the process in Minnesota by which a punitive damages claim may be added to a case, and the circumstances under which punitive damages may be awarded. Section III of this article discusses the role of the courts in reviewing a jury's award of punitive damages in light of …


Tort Law—The Motorist’S Guide To State Policy: Vehicle Owner Vicarious Liability Following Grants Of Initial Permission—Christensen V. Milbank Insurance Co., Christopher K. Iijima Jan 2003

Tort Law—The Motorist’S Guide To State Policy: Vehicle Owner Vicarious Liability Following Grants Of Initial Permission—Christensen V. Milbank Insurance Co., Christopher K. Iijima

William Mitchell Law Review

This note explores the Christensen decision and its effect on motor vehicle owner liability in Minnesota. First, the note presents a historical perspective from which to view the Christensen decision and Minnesota's motor vehicle liability and conversion laws. Next, the note summarizes the factual and procedural history of the Christensen case. Then the note discusses the Minnesota Supreme Court holding in Christensen. The note goes further to present a policy and legal analysis of the Christensen decision. Further, the note suggests an amendment to allow evenhanded treatment of vehicle owners, while satisfying state policy. The note concludes that the Christensen …