Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0676: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0676: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-129. 99-130, 2000-16 & 2000-17
Appeal No. 0677: B.T. Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0677: B.T. Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-142
Appeal No. 0675: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0675: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-129. 99-130, 2000-16 & 2000-17
Appeal No. 0678: Perto Drilling Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0678: Perto Drilling Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-156
Appeal No. 0686: B.T. Energy Corp. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0686: B.T. Energy Corp. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-43
Appeal No. 0654: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0654: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 98-48
Appeal No. 0681: Joseph T. Flaherty, Dba Pioneer Production V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0681: Joseph T. Flaherty, Dba Pioneer Production V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-82
Appeal No. 0682: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0682: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2000-14
Appeal No. 0683: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0683: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-129. 99-130, 2000-16 & 2000-17
Appeal No. 0684: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0684: Robert Barr, Dba Big Sky Petro. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 99-129. 99-130, 2000-16 & 2000-17
Frank J. Battisti Memorial Lecture: School Reform: Past, Present, And Future, Diane Ravitch
Frank J. Battisti Memorial Lecture: School Reform: Past, Present, And Future, Diane Ravitch
Case Western Reserve Law Review
No abstract provided.
Second-Parent Adoption By Same-Sex Couples In Ohio: Unsettled And Unsettling Law, Susan J. Becker
Second-Parent Adoption By Same-Sex Couples In Ohio: Unsettled And Unsettling Law, Susan J. Becker
Cleveland State Law Review
In addition to the need for homes for children without any legally recognized parent, the need for a child who already has one legal parent to be adopted by the parent's gay or lesbian partner who is already serving as a de facto parent is very important to the child's emotional stability and material well being. This type of adoption, frequently referred to as a "second-parent" adoption,' is the focal point of this article. However, the matters discussed herein also apply directly and by analogy to situations where gay and lesbian couples and heterosexual unmarried couples desire to jointly adopt …
The Grand Jury And Exculpatory Evidence: Should The Prosecutor Be Required To Disclose Exculpatory Evidence To The Grand Jury, Ali Lombardo
The Grand Jury And Exculpatory Evidence: Should The Prosecutor Be Required To Disclose Exculpatory Evidence To The Grand Jury, Ali Lombardo
Cleveland State Law Review
In 1992, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Williams that the federal courts do not have the supervisory power to require prosecutors to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. This Note argues that the Williams decision is flawed because it diminishes crucial rights of defendants and because it prevents the grand jury from fulfilling its protective function. In Section II, this Note examines the historical background and purpose of the grand jury in England and America. Section III discusses the Williams decision and the rationale behind both the majority and dissenting opinions. It also discusses …