Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Arbitration (2)
- Beneficiaries (2)
- Coverage (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Insured (2)
-
- Insurer (2)
- Liability (2)
- Life insurance (2)
- Policy (2)
- Policyholder (2)
- ADR Scholarship (1)
- Accidents (1)
- Adjudicate (1)
- Auto accident (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Business pursuits (1)
- Classification (1)
- Common law fraud (1)
- Compensatory damages (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Custody (1)
- Damages (1)
- Dichotomy (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Disputant's (1)
- Dispute (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Eclectic (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Recent case developments in Insurance Law in the years 1999 and 2000.
Identifying Real Dichotomies Underlying The False Dichotomy: Twenty-First Century Mediation In An Eclectic Regime, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Identifying Real Dichotomies Underlying The False Dichotomy: Twenty-First Century Mediation In An Eclectic Regime, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Some people (lawyers, scholars, judges, dispute resolvers, policymakers) are more concerned about fidelity to procedural protocols while others are more concerned with the substantive rules governing disputes and substantive outcomes. Those in the dispute resolution community preferring facilitation tend to be proceduralists. For them, the observance of proper procedure is a high goal, perhaps the dominant goal. They reason, often implicitly, that adherence to the rules of procedure is the essence of neutrality, fairness, and the proper role of a dispute resolving apparatus. At some level, usually subconscious, there is a post-modern philosophical aspect of this preference. Because humans cannot …
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Recent case developments in Insurance Law in the years 1999 and 2000.
Forum Non Conveniens In Federal Statutory Cases, Keith A. Rowley, Lonny Sheinkopf Hoffman
Forum Non Conveniens In Federal Statutory Cases, Keith A. Rowley, Lonny Sheinkopf Hoffman
Scholarly Works
This article, previously published in Volume 49 of the Emory Law Journal, examines the federal doctrine of forum non conveniens in cases in which the plaintiff asserts a right to relief under federal law. The arguments we advance - particularly our claim that the federal doctrine of forum non conveniens can be better understood not as turning on matters of convenience, as the formal doctrine suggests, but on an assessment of the relative sovereign interests in adjudicating the dispute - remain relevant to an understanding of the federal doctrine. The paper, thus, may be of interest to practitioners, academics and …