Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States Military Forces In The Balkans: Ending The Deployment, Ibpp Editor
United States Military Forces In The Balkans: Ending The Deployment, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article explores the political psychological implications of ending the deployment of United States (US) military forces in the Balkans.
Legal Implications Of Nato's Armed Intervention In Kosovo, Ved P. Nanda
Legal Implications Of Nato's Armed Intervention In Kosovo, Ved P. Nanda
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
The Charter Of The United Nations As A World Constitution, Ronald St. J. Macdonald
The Charter Of The United Nations As A World Constitution, Ronald St. J. Macdonald
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
International Law And The Conduct Of Military Operations: Stocktaking At The Start Of A New Millenium, Christopher Greenwood
International Law And The Conduct Of Military Operations: Stocktaking At The Start Of A New Millenium, Christopher Greenwood
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
The Law Of Armed Conflict As Soft Power: Optimizing Strategic Choice, Michael N. Schmitt
The Law Of Armed Conflict As Soft Power: Optimizing Strategic Choice, Michael N. Schmitt
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
On Genocide, Anthony D'Amato
Full Volume 75: International Law Across The Spectrum Of Conflict
Full Volume 75: International Law Across The Spectrum Of Conflict
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
Legal Issues Of Multinational Military Units: Tasks And Missions, Statinging Law, Command And Control, Dieter Fleck
Legal Issues Of Multinational Military Units: Tasks And Missions, Statinging Law, Command And Control, Dieter Fleck
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
Nato Intervention On Trial: The Legal Case That Was Never Made, Paul Williams, Michael Scharff
Nato Intervention On Trial: The Legal Case That Was Never Made, Paul Williams, Michael Scharff
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The United States and its NATO allies have defended the air strikes against Yugoslavia on moral grounds (to stop atrocities) and security grounds (to prevent the conflict from spilling over to neighboring European countries), but curiously they have never articulated a legal justification for the intervention. The nearest the NATO countries have come to articulating a legal rationale has been to cite various resolutions of the Security Council, in which the Council has determined that the actions of Yugoslavia in Kosovo constitute a threat to peace and security in the region and, pursuant to Chapter VII of the UN Charter, …
The Incident At Cavalese And Strategic Compensation, Robert D. Sloane
The Incident At Cavalese And Strategic Compensation, Robert D. Sloane
Faculty Scholarship
In 1953, the United States ratified the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. The drafters foresaw that the presence and training of foreign military forces within and between their territories would probably, if not inevitably, cause injury to civilians, giving rise to claims that, if not settled quickly and satisfactorily, could spark incidents disruptive to their cooperation in mutual defense. To this end, the SOFA established a jurisdictional regime designed to minimize the political friction these incidents threatened to generate, by providing prompt and manifestly fair settlement procedures. This result was vital to NATO's operations, for, in democratic host states, popular …
Benign Hegemony? Kosovo And Article 2(4) Of The U.N. Charter, Jules Lobel
Benign Hegemony? Kosovo And Article 2(4) Of The U.N. Charter, Jules Lobel
Articles
The 1999 U.S.-led, NATO-assisted air strike against Yugoslavia has been extolled by some as leading to the creation of a new rule of international law permitting nations to undertake forceful humanitarian intervention where the Security Council cannot act. This view posits the United States as a benevolent hegemon militarily intervening in certain circumstances in defense of such universal values as the protection of human rights. This article challenges that view. NATO's Kosovo intervention does not represent a benign hegemony introducing a new rule of international law. Rather, the United States, freed from Cold War competition with a rival superpower, is …
Nato Intervention On Trial: The Legal Case That Was Never Made, Paul Williams, Michael Scharff
Nato Intervention On Trial: The Legal Case That Was Never Made, Paul Williams, Michael Scharff
Paul Williams
The United States and its NATO allies have defended the air strikes against Yugoslavia on moral grounds (to stop atrocities) and security grounds (to prevent the conflict from spilling over to neighboring European countries), but curiously they have never articulated a legal justification for the intervention. The nearest the NATO countries have come to articulating a legal rationale has been to cite various resolutions of the Security Council, in which the Council has determined that the actions of Yugoslavia in Kosovo constitute a threat to peace and security in the region and, pursuant to Chapter VII of the UN Charter, …