Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Advanced Marine Enterprises Inc. v. PRC Inc. (1)
- American International Security Specialists Inc. v. Roberts (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- CDA (1)
- California Dental Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission (1)
-
- California Dental Association (1)
- Carolina Water Service Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem (1)
- Command Force Security Inc. v. City of Portsmouth (1)
- Commercial Business Systems Inc. v. BellSouth Services Inc. (1)
- Estate Construction Co. v. Miller & Smith Holding Co. (1)
- FTC (1)
- Greenspan v. Osheroft (1)
- Health-Care Services Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital (1)
- In re Motorsports Merchandise Antitrust Litigation (1)
- Klor's Inc v. Broadway-Hale Stores Inc. (1)
- Levine v. McLeskey (1)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. (1)
- NYNEX Corp. v. Discon Inc. (1)
- Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital (1)
- Omega World Travel Inc. v. Airlines Reporting Corp. (1)
- Peterson v. Cooley (1)
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire (1)
- United States v. Motorola (1)
- Wuchenich v. Shenandoah Memorial Hospital (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski, James R. Creekmore
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski, James R. Creekmore
University of Richmond Law Review
During the past year, the United States Supreme Court, in two decisions of significance, refused to summarily censure conduct having legitimate, procompetitive benefits. In similar fashion, the United States Court ofAppeals for the Fourth Circuit continued to scrutinize antitrust claims, rejecting those failing to measure up to pleading and proof requirements, while also reaffirming the vitality of the state action immunity doctrine as a bar to those that did. Meanwhile, Virginia's federal district courts grappled with time worn conspiracy challenges to medical staff privileging decisions, while simultaneously forging new ground in one of the first cases to consider market definition …