Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Bennis v. Michigan (1)
- Bulala v. Boyd (1)
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. (1)
- Chapman v. City of Virginia Beach (1)
-
- Cherry v. DS Nash Construction Co. (1)
- Coleman v. Hogan (1)
- Dickerson v. Fatehi (1)
- Edmonton v. Leesville Concrete Co. (1)
- Fairfax Hospital System v. Nevitt (1)
- Foucha v. Louisiana (1)
- Frey v. Jefferson Homebuilders (1)
- Fuentes v. Shevin (1)
- Galbraith v. Fleming (1)
- Gay v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. (1)
- Goldsmith v. United States (1)
- Harmony v. United States (1)
- JEB v. Alabama ex rel TB (1)
- Lake v. Northern Virginia Women's Medical Center (1)
- Lawson v. Elkins (1)
- Moore v. Warren (1)
- RK Chevrolet v. Hayden (1)
- Schwartz v. Brownlee (1)
- Seyfarth Shaw Fairweather & Geraldson v. Lake Fairfax Seven Ltd. Partnership (1)
- Smith v. Smith (1)
- St. George v. Pariser (1)
- Strassle v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n (1)
- Swann v. Marks (1)
- Tazewell Oil Co. v. United Virginia Bank (1)
- The Palmyra (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Innocent Owner Defense To Civil Forfeiture Proceedings, Peter David Houtz
The Innocent Owner Defense To Civil Forfeiture Proceedings, Peter David Houtz
University of Richmond Law Review
The Constitution of the United States prohibits the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Constitution also expressly states that private property may not be "taken" by the government without "just compensation." Seizures and forfeitures of personal and real property without notification or hearing and without compensation have, however, become a powerful tool used by the government to deter crime.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, David D. Hopper
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, David D. Hopper
University of Richmond Law Review
Virginia courts and the General Assembly have effected several changes in civil practice and procedure during the past year. This article focuses on some significant developments and interests to the general litigation attorney.