Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Aster v. Gross (1)
- Batleman v. Rubin (1)
- Booth v. Booth (1)
- Bottoms v. Bottoms (1)
-
- Brooks v. Rogers (1)
- Calvert v. Calvert (1)
- Carpenter v. Carpenter (1)
- Carter v. Thornhill (1)
- Cook v. Cook (1)
- Decker v. Decker (1)
- Donnell v. Donnell (1)
- Goodman v. Hamman (1)
- Gottlieb v. Gottlieb (1)
- Hughes v. Gentry (1)
- Jones v. Division of Child Support Enforcement (1)
- Jones v. Jones (1)
- Kelley v. Kelley (1)
- Konefal v. Konefal (1)
- LCS v. SAS (1)
- McClanahan v. McClanahan (1)
- McDavid v. McDavid (1)
- Moseley v. Moseley (1)
- Parish v. Spaulding (1)
- Pharo v. Pharo (1)
- Rogers v. Yourshaw (1)
- Sanford v. Sanford (1)
- Smith v. Smith (1)
- The Dead Hand Loses its Grip in Virginia: A New Rule for Trust Amendment and Termination? (1)
- Toomey v. Toomey (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Domestic Relations, Deanna D. Cook
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Domestic Relations, Deanna D. Cook
University of Richmond Law Review
It is well known that non-conforming payments or overpayment of support will not entitle a payor spouse to future credit against his obligations. This continues to be the rule in Virginia. In the case of Sanford v. Sanford, the Virginia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision to credit excess spousal support payments made by the husband against his future obligations. The husband agreed to pay spousal support pursuant to a property settlement agreement, which was incorporated into the parties' final divorce decree. The husband was then terminated by his employer, but he received one year severance pay. Based …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.