Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Are v. Oklahoma (1)
- Bailey v. Commonwealth (1)
- Barrett v. Commonwealth (1)
- Beard v. Commonwealth (1)
- Berkeley v. Commonwealth (1)
-
- Bivins v. Commonwealth (1)
- Brown v. Allen (1)
- Bryant v. Commonwealth (1)
- Buck v. Commonwealth (1)
- Cady v. Dombrowski (1)
- Carbaugh v. Commonwealth (1)
- Collins v. Lockhart (1)
- Colorado v. Bertrine (1)
- Commonwealth v. DeHart (1)
- Davis v. Minnesota (1)
- Ex parte Royall (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Glass v. United States (1)
- Granberry v. Greer (1)
- Great Writ (1)
- Griffen v. Commonwealth (1)
- Griswold v. Commonwealth (1)
- Hines v. Commonwealth (1)
- Hopkins v. Commonwealth (1)
- Hudak v. Commonwealth (1)
- Husske v. Commonwealth (1)
- James v. Commonwealth (1)
- Jennings v. Commonwealth (1)
- Jha v. Commonwealth (1)
- Johnson v. Commonwealth (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Cullen D. Seltzer
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Cullen D. Seltzer
University of Richmond Law Review
The past year has been an active one for the Virginia courts and General Assembly in the areas of criminal law and procedure. Developments include cases regarding the allowance of expert assistance to indigent criminal defendants and a defendant's right to a new trial based on after-discovered evidence. Driving under the influence [DUI] defendants are no longer entitled to their choice of a blood or breath test as a function of the implied consent law, and for felons convicted of committing an offense after December 31, 1994, parole is no longer an option. This article surveys these and other legislative …
Procedural Labyrinths And The Injustice Of Death: A Critique Of Death Penalty Habeas Corpus (Part One), Alan W. Clarke
Procedural Labyrinths And The Injustice Of Death: A Critique Of Death Penalty Habeas Corpus (Part One), Alan W. Clarke
University of Richmond Law Review
Habeas corpus was once a broad writ of liberty: it served to give meaning to expanding notions of due process, it forced state judicial systems to obey constitutional commands, and it made effective modern conceptions of fundamental fairness. Although a simple implement of humble origin, U.S. habeas corpus became inextricably interwoven with the substantive rights it enforced. Without a practical remedy, cutting across state boundaries and affording uniform access, the substantive rights themselves lose meaning. A right without remedy is a right without meaning. Thus, habeas corpus became an important part of the substantive rights that it enforced.