Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American Paper Institute v. EPA (1)
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court (1)
- Barone v. Rich Brothers Interstate Display Fireworks (1)
- Bashaw v. Bell Hotel Management Co. (1)
- Benitez-Allende v. Alcan Aluminio Do Brasil (1)
-
- Boit v. Gar-Tec Products (1)
- Burger King v. Rudzewicz (1)
- CWA (1)
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Virginia State Water Control Board (1)
- Church of Scientology of California v. Adams (1)
- Clean Water Act (1)
- Court v. Ash (1)
- Crown Simpson Pulp Co. v. Costle (1)
- Dalmau Rodriguez v. Hughes Aircraft (1)
- Dehmlow v. Austin Fireworks (1)
- District of Columbia v. Schramm (1)
- EPA (1)
- Environmental Defense Fund v. Virginia State Water Control Board (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Federal Insurance Co. v. Lake Shore Inc. (1)
- Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distribution. Party (1)
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. (1)
- Hall v. Zambelli (1)
- Hanson v. Denckla (1)
- Hutson v. Fehr Bros. (1)
- International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1)
- Lesnick v. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. (1)
- Mianus River Preservation Committee v. EPA (1)
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Ass'n (1)
- North American Corp. v. American Vending Sales (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Lesnick V. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. - The Pure Stream Of Commerce No Longer Flows Through The Fourth Circuit, Lori Elizabeth Jones
Lesnick V. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. - The Pure Stream Of Commerce No Longer Flows Through The Fourth Circuit, Lori Elizabeth Jones
University of Richmond Law Review
Personal jurisdiction over nonresidents in a forum state has been problematic in our federal system for quite some time. Today, in order to establish personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, the nonresident must have minimum contacts with the forum state. While the test may be stated succinctly, determining whether a person or corporation has minimum contacts with the forum state is an extremely complex process, as seen in the line of personal jurisdiction cases following International Shoe Co. v. Washington.
The Inconsistency Of Virginia's Execution Of The Npdes Permit Program: The Foreclosure Of Citizen Attorneys General From State And Federal Courts, D. Brennen Keene
The Inconsistency Of Virginia's Execution Of The Npdes Permit Program: The Foreclosure Of Citizen Attorneys General From State And Federal Courts, D. Brennen Keene
University of Richmond Law Review
The above mentioned goals and policies of the Clean Water Act suggest that Congress intended to create a partnership between the federal government, state governments, and the public to help abate pollution of the nation's waters. This intent is illustrated by the fact that permits issued to dischargers of pollutants into navigable waters can be issued by either the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state agency. Unfortunately, the goal of public involvement is lost in "the confusion caused by this poorly drafted and astonishingly imprecise statute." The resulting inconsistent system forecloses some members of the public from participating in …