Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (16)
- American University Washington College of Law (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- West Virginia University (8)
- Mercer University School of Law (7)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Chapman University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (15)
- Supreme Court (14)
- L. Ralph Mecham (12)
- United States Supreme Court (12)
- New York (10)
-
- Constitutions (6)
- Federal (6)
- Federal courts (6)
- James M. Sprouse (6)
- 1994) (5)
- Appellate Division (5)
- Defendant (5)
- Fifth Amendment (5)
- Justice Souter (5)
- Confessions (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Government (4)
- Local government (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- The College of William & Mary (4)
- Admissibility (3)
- Coercion (3)
- Courts (3)
- Due process (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Miranda v. Arizona (3)
- O'Connor (Sandra Day) (3)
- Poisonous Tree Doctrine (3)
- Police (3)
- Roger J Miner (3)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (16)
- American University Law Review (12)
- West Virginia Law Review (8)
- Mercer Law Review (7)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
-
- Villanova Law Review (6)
- Articles (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Publications (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Bar Associations (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (1)
- Induction Ceremonies and Investitures (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 106
Full-Text Articles in Law
Eulogy For The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, Supreme Court Of The United States, William H. Rehnquist
Eulogy For The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, Supreme Court Of The United States, William H. Rehnquist
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York Law School Reporter, Vol 11, No. 2, October 1995, New York Law School
New York Law School Reporter, Vol 11, No. 2, October 1995, New York Law School
Student Newspapers
No abstract provided.
Thurgood Marshall, Daniel Pollitt
Thurgood Marshall, Daniel Pollitt
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Clarence Thomas: Evasive Or Deceptive, Anton Bell
Clarence Thomas: Evasive Or Deceptive, Anton Bell
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eulogy For The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, Supreme Court Of The United States, J. Michael Luttig
Eulogy For The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, Supreme Court Of The United States, J. Michael Luttig
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Honorable Warren E. Burger, The Fifteenth Chief Justice Of The United States Supreme Court And Twentieth Chancellor Of The College Of William And Mary: Introductory Remarks, Timothy J. Sullivan
The Honorable Warren E. Burger, The Fifteenth Chief Justice Of The United States Supreme Court And Twentieth Chancellor Of The College Of William And Mary: Introductory Remarks, Timothy J. Sullivan
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eulogy For The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, Supreme Court Of The United States, Sandra Day O'Connor
Eulogy For The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, Supreme Court Of The United States, Sandra Day O'Connor
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substituting Secure Detention For Shelter Care: An Illegal Deprivation Of Liberty, Susan M. Johlie
Substituting Secure Detention For Shelter Care: An Illegal Deprivation Of Liberty, Susan M. Johlie
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Judges sitting on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia routinely order children into secure detention who require no more restrictive confinement than that provided by shelter care. Despite a statutory presumption against detention, and a superior court rule that prohibits substituting secure detention for shelter care,' the District inappropriately places children into secure detention simply because there is a lack of bed space in youth shelter houses. The deprivation of liberty that occurs when a juvenile is placed in secure detention rather than shelter care is required neither for the protection of the community nor for the welfare …
Section 1: Justices' Profiles, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Justices' Profiles, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Exorcising The Evil Of Forum-Shopping, Kevin M. Clermont, Theodore Eisenberg
Exorcising The Evil Of Forum-Shopping, Kevin M. Clermont, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Most of the business of litigation comprises pretrial disputes. A common and important dispute is over where adjudication should take place. Civil litigators deal with nearly as many change-of-venue motions as trials. The battle over venue often constitutes the critical issue in a case.
The American way is to provide plaintiffs with a wide choice of venues for suit. But the American way has its drawbacks. To counter these drawbacks, an integral part of our court systems, and in particular the federal court system, is the scheme of transfer of venue "in the interest of justice." However, the leading evaluative …
Gentleman Jim, J. Dickson Phillips Jr.
Tribute For The Honorable James M. Sprouse, Sam J. Ervin Iii
Tribute For The Honorable James M. Sprouse, Sam J. Ervin Iii
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribute To Judge Sprouse, Francis D. Murnaghan Jr.
Tribute To Judge Sprouse, Francis D. Murnaghan Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
James M. Sprouse, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
James M. Sprouse, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge James M. Sprouse, Forest J. Bowman
Judge James M. Sprouse, Forest J. Bowman
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
One Kind Of Legacy: Judge Sprouse's Law Clerks, Geraldine Szott Moohr
One Kind Of Legacy: Judge Sprouse's Law Clerks, Geraldine Szott Moohr
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thinking Clearly About Guilt, Juries, And Jeopardy, Stanton D. Krauss
Thinking Clearly About Guilt, Juries, And Jeopardy, Stanton D. Krauss
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Feminist Judging, Michael E. Solimine, Susan E. Wheatley
Rethinking Feminist Judging, Michael E. Solimine, Susan E. Wheatley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Politics And The Judiciary: The Influence Of Judicial Background On Case Outcomes, Orley Ashenfelter, Theodore Eisenberg, Stewart J. Schwab
Politics And The Judiciary: The Influence Of Judicial Background On Case Outcomes, Orley Ashenfelter, Theodore Eisenberg, Stewart J. Schwab
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
It is widely believed that the background and worldview of judges influence their decisions. This article uses the fact that judges are assigned their cases randomly to assess the effect of judicial background on the outcome of cases from the day-to-day docket in three federal trial courts. Unlike the political science findings of ideological influence in published opinions, we find little evidence that judges differ in their decisions with respect to the mass of case outcomes. Characteristics of the judges or the political party of the judge's appointing president are not significant predictors of judicial decisions.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence--Past, Present, And Future: A Twenty-Year Perspective, Faust Rossi
The Federal Rules Of Evidence--Past, Present, And Future: A Twenty-Year Perspective, Faust Rossi
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This Essay surveys three major transformations in state and federal rules of evidence since the introduction of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Rules have not only inspired a movement toward codification in the states, they have also liberalized the admission of expert testimony and hearsay. This partially explains thirteen states' reluctance to codify. Judges have furthered this trend by admitting far more discretionary hearsay evidence than Congress intended. Professor Rossi doubts this expansion of the hearsay exceptions would have occurred without the adoption of the FRE and suggests that the newly formed Advisory Committee will produce greater substantive changes …
Justice Lewis F. Powell And The Jurisprudence Of Centrism, Mark Tushnet
Justice Lewis F. Powell And The Jurisprudence Of Centrism, Mark Tushnet
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr by John C. Jeffries, Jr.
Hugo Black Among Friends, Dennis J. Hutchinson
Hugo Black Among Friends, Dennis J. Hutchinson
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Hugo Black: A Biography by Roger K. Newman
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law And The Inner Self, Michael A. Carrier
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law And The Inner Self, Michael A. Carrier
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self by G. Edward White
A Modern Hamlet In The Judicial Pantheon, Charles Alan Wright
A Modern Hamlet In The Judicial Pantheon, Charles Alan Wright
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Learned Hand: The Man and the Judge by Gerald Gunther
A Tribute To Justice Thomas B. Miller, Ancil G. Ramey
A Tribute To Justice Thomas B. Miller, Ancil G. Ramey
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
W Stories: Women In Leadership Positions In The Judiciary, Deanell Reece Tacha
W Stories: Women In Leadership Positions In The Judiciary, Deanell Reece Tacha
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Michigan Law Review
In Part I of this article, we examine the global puzzle of the Self-Incrimination Clause and the local confusion or perversion lurking behind virtually every key word and phrase in the clause as now construed. In Part II we elaborate our reading of the clause and show how it clears up the local problems and solves the overall puzzle.
Introduction To Mercer Law Review Symposium On Federal Judicial Independence, L. Ralph Mecham
Introduction To Mercer Law Review Symposium On Federal Judicial Independence, L. Ralph Mecham
Mercer Law Review
No abstract provided.
Independence Of The Judiciary For The Third Century, Deanell Reece Tacha
Independence Of The Judiciary For The Third Century, Deanell Reece Tacha
Mercer Law Review
For I agree, that "there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers... the complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited constitution."
The Federalist No. 78, at 402 (Alexander Hamilton)
Alexander Hamilton's impassioned advocacy of an independent judiciary rings as true now as it did when Hamilton was attempting to convince the people of the State of New York to ratify the new Constitution. For over 200 years, the independent federal judiciary has been a powerful tool in guarding the Constitution and the rights of …
"Separateness But Interdependence, Autonomy But Reciprocity": A First Look At Federal Judges' Appearances Before Legislative Committees, Harvey Rishikof, Barbara A. Perry
"Separateness But Interdependence, Autonomy But Reciprocity": A First Look At Federal Judges' Appearances Before Legislative Committees, Harvey Rishikof, Barbara A. Perry
Mercer Law Review
The Founding Fathers established judicial independence as a central tenet of the Constitution of the United States in order to insulate federal judges from the President, the Congress, and the electorate. Yet because of the complicated nature of the Constitution and overlapping powers, the judiciary has not remained totally isolated from the legislative process. Our research has discovered hundreds of instances of federal jurists testifying before congressional committees on subjects such as court administration, federal jurisdiction, budgetary policy, and pending legislation in a variety of fields. Indeed, our findings buttress a key argument of Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurring opinion …