Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Indigenous People: An American Perspective On The Case For Entrenchment Of Maori Rights In New Zealand Law, Jeanette Jameson
Indigenous People: An American Perspective On The Case For Entrenchment Of Maori Rights In New Zealand Law, Jeanette Jameson
Washington International Law Journal
The 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, signed by representatives of the British Crown and Maori Tribes, created a partnership that allowed colonization of New Zealand while protecting the Maori culture. The Treaty was declared a "nullity" in an 1877 court decision, and Maori rights under the Treaty have yet to be fully realized. Since the beginning of the 1970s, the New Zealand government has increasingly recognized the Maori culture. This Comment explores the history of the relationship between the Maori people and the New Zealand government. It analyzes current government policy on Maori issues. Fimally, it advocates for legislative entrenchment of …
From Quantification To Qualification: A State Court's Distortion Of The Law In In Re General Adjudication Of All Rights To Use Water In The Big Horn River System, Berrie Martinis
Washington Law Review
The Wyoming Supreme Court applied state law to Indian reserved water rights in its recent decision in In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System (Big Horn III). Prior to Big Horn III, courts never applied state law to such rights. This Note argues that the Wyoming decision contradicts federal reserved water rights law and federal Indian law, and concludes that Congress should enact legislation overturning the Big Horn III decision.
Recognizing Sovereignty In Alaska Native Villages After The Passage Of Ancsa, Patricia Thompson
Recognizing Sovereignty In Alaska Native Villages After The Passage Of Ancsa, Patricia Thompson
Washington Law Review
The federal law principles of tribal sovereignty and Indian country define the parameters of tribal self-governance. In Alaska, however, federal and state courts remain divided on the issues of Alaska Native Village sovereignty and Indian country. This Comment examines the state and federal court treatment of these issues, and concludes that Native Villages are sovereign tribes and the lands set aside under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act should define the boundaries of Indian country in Alaska.