Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- A. John Cohen Insurance Agency v. Middlesex Insurance Co. (1)
- AAU (1)
- Administration Appeals Unit (1)
- Blue Collar: An Internal Examination of the Workplace (1)
- Cort v. Bristol-Myers Co (1)
-
- Engquist v. Livingston County (1)
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp (1)
- Fortune v. National Cash Register (1)
- Fowler v. Varian Associates (1)
- Fundamental Legal Conceptions (1)
- Gantt v. Sentry Insurance (1)
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co (1)
- INA (1)
- INS (1)
- Immigration Act (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (1)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service (1)
- Interstate Commerce Commission (1)
- Ledl v. Quick Pic Foods (1)
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co (1)
- Maddaloni v. Western Massachusetts Bus Lines (1)
- McCone v. New England Telephone (1)
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co (1)
- Petermann v. Local 296 International Brotherhood of Teamsters (1)
- Power: Its Forms Bases and Uses (1)
- Richey v. American Automobile Ass'n (1)
- Sherriff v. Revell (1)
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield (1)
- Tenedios v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co (1)
- The Legal Foundations of Capitalism (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Revolution That Wasn't: On The Business As Usual Aspects Of Employment At Will, Sid L. Moller
The Revolution That Wasn't: On The Business As Usual Aspects Of Employment At Will, Sid L. Moller
University of Richmond Law Review
With a pronouncement that has become quite familiar to those who follow employment law, a nineteenth century state court captured the employment at will rule in its pristine form: "An employer can fire an employee for good reason, bad reason or for a reason morally wrong, without incurring any liability."
Employment-Based Preferences Categories: An Effort To Simplify Has Resulted In More Paperwork, Vishwa B. Bhargava
Employment-Based Preferences Categories: An Effort To Simplify Has Resulted In More Paperwork, Vishwa B. Bhargava
University of Richmond Law Review
With the passage of the Immigration Act of 19901 ("the Act"), employment-based and family-sponsored immigration underwent sweeping and dramatic reforms. By implementing new criteria for both these areas of immigration, the Act sought to realize its new policy of strengthening American competitiveness in the global economy and to reinforce its prior policy of favoring family reunification. The Act, which was signed into law by President Bush on November 29, 1990, and went into effect on October 1, 1991, "represents the culmination of a decade-long reform process that began with the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy in 1979." The …