Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Shifting Presumption Of Constitutionality In Land Use Law, A. Dan Tarlock
The Shifting Presumption Of Constitutionality In Land Use Law, A. Dan Tarlock
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Shifting Presumption Of Constitutionality In Land Use Law, A. Dan Tarlock
The Shifting Presumption Of Constitutionality In Land Use Law, A. Dan Tarlock
Dan Tarlock
No abstract provided.
The Commodification Of Nature's Metropolis: The Historical Context Of Illinois' Unique Zoning Standards, Fred P. Bosselman
The Commodification Of Nature's Metropolis: The Historical Context Of Illinois' Unique Zoning Standards, Fred P. Bosselman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Commodification Of Nature's Metropolis: The Historical Context Of Illinois' Unique Zoning Standards, Fred P. Bosselman
The Commodification Of Nature's Metropolis: The Historical Context Of Illinois' Unique Zoning Standards, Fred P. Bosselman
Fred P. Bosselman
No abstract provided.
Private Property Investment, Lucas And The Fairness Doctrine, John R. Nolon
Private Property Investment, Lucas And The Fairness Doctrine, John R. Nolon
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
These remarks are not intended to advocate the interests of the new property rights movement. In fact, those advocates will be disappointed by what I say. Rather, I aspire to view the issue of real property regulation as broadly as possible, reaching beyond the jurisprudence of regulatory takings cases into the realms of real estate transactions law and comprehensive land use planning.
Footprints In The Shifting Sands Of The Isle Of Palms: A Practical Analysis Of Regulatory Takings Cases, John R. Nolon
Footprints In The Shifting Sands Of The Isle Of Palms: A Practical Analysis Of Regulatory Takings Cases, John R. Nolon
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
It was not until the last day of the term, June 29, 1992, that the Court decided Lucas. By that time, interest could not have been greater. At issue was the validity of a regulation that prohibited all permanent development of the plaintiff's two beachfront lots. The South Carolina Supreme Court upheld the regulation by a 3-2 margin because it prevented a “great public harm.” The U.S. Supreme Court reversed that determination and remanded the case to determine whether South Carolina's common law of nuisance could prohibit the construction of single-family housing on the lots. The fractured Court delivered an …