Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1992

Torts

Journal

Emotional distress/North Carolina

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Tort Law: The Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress - Reopening Pandora's Box - Johnson V. Ruark Obstetrics, Donna L. Shumate Jan 1992

Tort Law: The Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress - Reopening Pandora's Box - Johnson V. Ruark Obstetrics, Donna L. Shumate

Campbell Law Review

This Note will first trace the development of the negligent infliction of emotional distress in North Carolina case law. Second, the Note will explain the limitations on recovery adopted in other jurisdictions and explore the policies behind those limitations. Finally, this Note will analyze the Johnson decision by comparing its holding to the recent national trend and by noting problems that the North Carolina Supreme Court did not adequately address.


Dickens V. Puryear And Progeny: An Overview Of Recent North Carolina Case Law Concerning The Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress, William B. L. Little Jan 1992

Dickens V. Puryear And Progeny: An Overview Of Recent North Carolina Case Law Concerning The Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress, William B. L. Little

Campbell Law Review

This Survey is an overview of relative North Carolina caselaw since 1981 concerning the intentional infliction of emotional distress.