Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- A Tribute To A.L. Philpott (1)
- Addington-Beaman Lumber Co v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Ass'n (1)
- Allen v. Chapman (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law Articles (1)
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. Glasser Brothers Corp. (1)
-
- Cameras In Virginia Courtrooms (1)
- Carmel v. City of Hampton (1)
- City of Virginia Beach v. ESG Enterprises (1)
- Davis v. Cleve Marsh Hunt Club (1)
- Dedication (1)
- Donation Act (1)
- Edmonton Homes v. McKinney Group (1)
- Friends of Clark Mountain Foundation v. Board of Supervisors of Orange County (1)
- Funches v. Funches (1)
- Garrison v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n (1)
- Hayes v. Aquia Marina (1)
- Holland v. Johnson (1)
- Holly Hill Farm Corp. v. Rowe (1)
- Index (1)
- J.H. Mitchell (1)
- James T. Bush Construction Co v. Patel (1)
- Lamar Corp v. City of Richmond (1)
- Marcus Neff (1)
- McLeskey v. Ocean Park Investors (1)
- On The Passing of A.L. Philpott (1)
- Oregon (1)
- Pennoyer v. Neff (1)
- Perspective (1)
- Pitts v. United States (1)
- Princess Anne Hills Civic League v. Susan Constant Real Estate Trust (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Property Law, Charles H. Rothenberg
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Property Law, Charles H. Rothenberg
University of Richmond Law Review
Both the Virginia Supreme Court and the General Assembly addressed important issues affecting property law in Virginia over the past year. For instance, the Virginia Supreme Court considered for the first time the extent to which dominant estate owners could improve rights of way benefiting their property. The General Assembly has gone a long way toward vitiating the long held caveat emptor rule predominant in Virginia by adopting a residential sales disclosure statute. These and other important cases and statutes are discussed below.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sin, Scandal, And Substantive Due Process, Wendy Collins Perdue
Sin, Scandal, And Substantive Due Process, Wendy Collins Perdue
Law Faculty Publications
For students of civil procedure, the names Pennoyer and Neff evoke these dry facts: In an initial suit, one J.H. Mitchell sued Neff in Oregon state court. Because Neff could not be found within Oregon, he was served by publication. Neff never appeared, and a default judgment was entered against him. To satisfy the judgment, Mitchell attached Neff's Oregon real estate. The property was sold at auction, and Pennoyer later acquired it. Nearly a decade later, Neff returned to Oregon and brought suit in federal court to evict Pennoyer from the land, claiming that the original judgment was invalid. The …