Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Relief From Final Judgment Under Rule 60(B)(1) Due To Judicial Errors Of Law, Michigan Law Review May 1985

Relief From Final Judgment Under Rule 60(B)(1) Due To Judicial Errors Of Law, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note seeks to resolve these conflicts by proposing a sensible reading of rule 60(b )(1) that reconciles the basic philosophies underlying differing interpretations of the rule. Part I examines the history of rule 60(b)(l) and the policies espoused by the courts and commentators in considering whether the rule should be applied to judicial errors of law and concludes that courts should employ the rule to correct obvious judicial errors of law. Part II recommends a broad scope for rule 60(b )(1) motions, proposing that the only type of alleged judicial error outside the reach of such a motion should …


Reflections On The Substance Of Finality , Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr. Apr 1985

Reflections On The Substance Of Finality , Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Further Reflections , Judith Resnik Apr 1985

Further Reflections , Judith Resnik

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Introduction: Deficiency Judgments In Pennsylvania: Two Points Of View, Various Editors Jan 1985

Introduction: Deficiency Judgments In Pennsylvania: Two Points Of View, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.


Should Federal Courts Give Greater Effect To State Judgments Than Would The Courts That Rendered Them?, Gene R. Shreve Jan 1985

Should Federal Courts Give Greater Effect To State Judgments Than Would The Courts That Rendered Them?, Gene R. Shreve

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.