Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standing To Challenge The Disposition Of Land In Alaska: A Proposed Remedy For The Inadequacies In The Current Case Law, Michael C. Castellon
Standing To Challenge The Disposition Of Land In Alaska: A Proposed Remedy For The Inadequacies In The Current Case Law, Michael C. Castellon
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case For A Federal Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege That Protects Patient Identity, Ellen S. Soffin
The Case For A Federal Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege That Protects Patient Identity, Ellen S. Soffin
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tinker Revisited: Fraser V. Bethel School District And Regulation Of Speech In The Public Schools, James C. Dever Iii
Tinker Revisited: Fraser V. Bethel School District And Regulation Of Speech In The Public Schools, James C. Dever Iii
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Negligence Per Se And Broad Statutory Construction In Alaska: The Adoption Of An Applicable Statute As An Appropriate Standard Of Care, Richard A. Frank
Negligence Per Se And Broad Statutory Construction In Alaska: The Adoption Of An Applicable Statute As An Appropriate Standard Of Care, Richard A. Frank
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mismatching Convertible Debentures And Common Stock Under Section 16(B), Daniel B. Bogart
Mismatching Convertible Debentures And Common Stock Under Section 16(B), Daniel B. Bogart
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Shareholders’ Derivative-Claim Exception To The Attorney-Client Privilege
The Shareholders’ Derivative-Claim Exception To The Attorney-Client Privilege
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Meiners V. Bering Strait School District And The Recall Of Public Officers: A Proposal For Legislative Reform, W. Richard Fossey
Meiners V. Bering Strait School District And The Recall Of Public Officers: A Proposal For Legislative Reform, W. Richard Fossey
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alaska’S Quasi-Public Hospitals: The Implications Of Storrs, M. Kathleen Kenyon
Alaska’S Quasi-Public Hospitals: The Implications Of Storrs, M. Kathleen Kenyon
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Market Participant Test In Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis—Protecting Protectionism?, Richard H. Seamon
The Market Participant Test In Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis—Protecting Protectionism?, Richard H. Seamon
Duke Law Journal
The Supreme Court's traditional analysis of state actions under the dormant commerce clause 1 has undergone two important modifications over the past decade. 2 In the first, the Court established a rule under which certain state actions that are within the scope of the dormant commerce clause may be deemed per se invalid, without inquiry into the extent to which the challenged state action burdens interstate commerce or furthers legitimate local objectives. 3 In the second, the Court fashioned a threshold inquiry to determine whether state action constitutes "market participation," 4 in which case it lies outside the scope of …
Vacation Homes, Section 280a And Bolton V. Commissioner: The Right Result For The Wrong Reasons, Jeffrey T. Lawyer
Vacation Homes, Section 280a And Bolton V. Commissioner: The Right Result For The Wrong Reasons, Jeffrey T. Lawyer
Duke Law Journal
In response to widespread concern that many taxpayers were renting their vacation homes in order to deduct otherwise nondeductible, personal expenses, Congress in 1976 added section 280A 1 to the Internal Revenue Code. 2 By this enactment, Congress sought to limit the deductibility of vacation home expenses when a vacation home is used for both rental and personal purposes 3 by requiring taxpayers to allocate expenses associated with the vacation home between personal and rental use. Although in framing section 280A Congress set out to provide objective rules for determining that allocation, recent controversy concerning the interpretation of the section …
Express Versus Automatic Assignment Of Section 10(B) Causes Of Action, David C. Profilet
Express Versus Automatic Assignment Of Section 10(B) Causes Of Action, David C. Profilet
Duke Law Journal
In Lowry v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered whether the owner of a security may assert his seller's section 10(b) cause of action if the current owner did not receive an express assignment of the seller's rights. 2 That is, if the seller of a security has a section 10(b) claim, does the seller's cause of action "run with the security" so that the seller's purchaser takes the seller's cause of action by automatic assignment, or must the purchaser secure an express assignment of the seller's cause of action …
Equal Educational Opportunity For Children With Special Needs: The Federal Role In Australia, Betsy Levin
Equal Educational Opportunity For Children With Special Needs: The Federal Role In Australia, Betsy Levin
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Sex Discrimination In The Supreme Court—A Comment On Sex Equality, Sex Differences, And The Supreme Court, Earl M. Maltz
Sex Discrimination In The Supreme Court—A Comment On Sex Equality, Sex Differences, And The Supreme Court, Earl M. Maltz
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.