Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (4)
- Race and law (4)
- Racism (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Children (2)
-
- Equal protection (2)
- Families (2)
- Freedom (2)
- Gender and law (2)
- Sex discrimination (2)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Affordable housing (1)
- African Americans (1)
- American Civil Liberties Union (1)
- Animus (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Case studies (1)
- Causes of action (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Congress (1)
- Connecticut v. Teal (1)
- Control (1)
- Data (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Exclusion (1)
- Fathers (1)
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Novotny (1)
- Griffin v. Breckenridge (1)
- Griggs v. Duke Power Company (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sex Discrimination In Newscasting, Leslie S. Gielow
Sex Discrimination In Newscasting, Leslie S. Gielow
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that the current judicial deference to viewer surveys used by television stations in newscasting employment decisions is unwarranted. Part I explores how different treatment of women newscasters constitutes sex-plus discrimination. Part II demonstrates that viewer surveys almost always reflect sexual stereotypes that are impermissible under title VII, and argues that such surveys should be presumptively inadmissible as evidence to rebut a claim of sex discrimination. Indeed, mere use of these surveys may in and of itself establish a prima facie case of sex discrimination.
Part III contends that sex discrimination in the news industry resulting from the …
The Class-Based Animus Requirement Of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): A Limiting Strategy Gone Awry?, Devin S. Schindler
The Class-Based Animus Requirement Of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): A Limiting Strategy Gone Awry?, Devin S. Schindler
Michigan Law Review
This Note focuses on Scott's impact on attempts to determine what groups fall within the statute. Part I examines the various class-based animus formulas generated by the circuits since Griffin and the potential impact of Scott on these formulas. Part II argues that the key to understanding the scope of the class-based animus requirement lies in traditional fourteenth amendment equal protection analysis.
Exclusion Of Families With Children From Housing, George Palmer Schober
Exclusion Of Families With Children From Housing, George Palmer Schober
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note attempts to resolve the most significant problems raised by discrimination against children in housing. Part I briefly analyzes the prevalence of child exclusion in different types of housing. It also provides a statistical analysis of the rental housing market to enable the reader to gauge the extent of the problem in one type of housing. Part II discusses policy arguments supporting both those who seek to exclude children and those who advocate government policies forbidding exclusion. Part III then examines the various approaches that states have adopted in this area, as well as federal implications of the issue. …
The 'Legalization' Of The Family: Toward A Policy Of Supportive Neutrality, David L. Chambers
The 'Legalization' Of The Family: Toward A Policy Of Supportive Neutrality, David L. Chambers
Articles
The word "legalization" has conflicting meanings. One, intended to sound the theme of this conference, conveys the notion of government regulation permeating some area of human activity. The other-as found, for example, in the phrase "the legalization of marijuana"-is a near opposite: the process of making legal or permissible that which. was previously forbidden, taking government out of that which it had previously controlled. The recent history of government's relationship to the family amply displays both sorts of legalization, both government's intrusion and its withdrawal, and reveals a paradoxical relation between the two-that as government frees people to live their …
The Bottom Line Limitation To The Rule Of Griggs V. Duke Power Company, James P. Scanlan
The Bottom Line Limitation To The Rule Of Griggs V. Duke Power Company, James P. Scanlan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I of this article analyzes the background to the Teal decision and the treatment by the majority and dissent of the issue known in employment discrimination law as the "bottom line" limitation to the disparate impact theory of employment discrimination. Part II explains why, for reasons beyond those considered by the Teal majority, not only was the Court's rejection of the bottom line theory manifestly correct, but a contrary result would have had grievous consequences. Part III then argues for a similar rejection of the bottom line limitation in those situations where most observers have taken for granted that …
Our Endangered Rights: The Aclu Report On Civil Liberties Today, Michigan Law Review
Our Endangered Rights: The Aclu Report On Civil Liberties Today, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Our Endangered Rights: The ACLU Report on Civil Liberties Today by Norman Dorsen
The Burden Of Brown: Thirty Years Of School Desegregation, Michigan Law Review
The Burden Of Brown: Thirty Years Of School Desegregation, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Burden of Brown: Thirty Years of School Desegregation by Raymond Wolters
Dimensions Of Tolerance: What Americans Believe About Civil Liberties, Michigan Law Review
Dimensions Of Tolerance: What Americans Believe About Civil Liberties, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe About Civil Liberties by Herbert McClosky and Alida Brill
Of Cultural Determinism And The Limits Of Law, Paul R. Dimond, Gene Sperling
Of Cultural Determinism And The Limits Of Law, Paul R. Dimond, Gene Sperling
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality? by Thomas Sowell
Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Michigan Law Review
Racial prejudice has come under increasingly close scrutiny during the past thirty years, yet its influence on the decisionmaking of criminal juries remains largely hidden from judicial and critical examination. In this Article, Professor Johnson takes a close look at this neglected area. She first sets forth a large body of social science research that reveals a widespread tendency among whites to convict black defendants in instances in which white defendants would be acquitted. Next, she argues that none of the existing techniques for eliminating the influence of racial bias on criminal trials adequately protects minority-race defendants. She contends that …