Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (2)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (2)
- Applicability of due process to juvenile proceedings (1)
- Article V Section 3 of Texas Constitution (1)
- Associate Justice (1)
-
- Carlos Cadena (1)
- Commonwealth v. Fisher (1)
- Criminal-civil dichotomy (1)
- Delinquency proceedings (1)
- Development of juvenile proceedings (1)
- Due process reforms for juvenile proceedings. (1)
- Duncan v. Louisiana (1)
- Ex parte Caldwell (1)
- Ex parte Calhoun (1)
- Ex parte Davis (1)
- Ex parte Heard (1)
- Ex parte Herring (1)
- Ex parte Hooks (1)
- Ex parte Leonard Storm (1)
- Ex parte Preston (1)
- Ex parte Prickett (1)
- Ex parte Proctor (1)
- Ex parte Ramzy (1)
- Ex parte Savelle (1)
- Ex parte Slavin (1)
- Ex parte Yates (1)
- Fay v. Noia. (1)
- Fourth Court of Civil Appeals (1)
- Gallegos v. Colorado (1)
- Habeas corpus proceedings (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court Of Texas Is Without Jurisdiction To Grant A Writ Of Mandamus To Direct A District Judge To Dismiss An Indictment In A Criminal Case On The Ground That Relator Was Denied A Speedy Trial., John A. Pizzitola
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
St. Mary's Law Journal
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proceedings. The goal of the juvenile court movement was to establish systems of education and protection of errant children, rather than deterrence and retribution. To accomplish these results, the juvenile court was shorn of all resemblance to criminal courts. Public hearings were to be avoided and the intervention of counsel was not required, since the juvenile judge represented both the child and the state. However, it became clear that children were receiving the protection of the state because they engaged in criminal conduct and with little …
Habeas Corpus Proceedings In The Supreme Court Of Texas., Joe Greenhill, Martin D. Beirne Jr.
Habeas Corpus Proceedings In The Supreme Court Of Texas., Joe Greenhill, Martin D. Beirne Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
Writs of habeas corpus, anchored both in the common law and Constitution of Texas, are vitally important to secure the freedom of those wrongfully imprisoned. However, minimal literature on the subject exists to assist attorneys who must prepare and present an application for writ of habeas corpus to the Supreme Court of Texas. To address the gap in literature, this article lays out the process attorneys should follow when filing a writ of habeas corpus. The most important items which should be brought before the Court are: (1) a motion for leave to file the application; (2) the application for …