Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 1946 Model Probate Code (1)
- Arrest Series (1)
- Best interests of the child doctrine (1)
- Book Review (1)
- Capability of Children (1)
-
- Child welfare agency (1)
- Children's Bureau (1)
- Crime clock (1)
- Criminal statistics (1)
- Custodial right (1)
- Custody (1)
- Derecho Procesal Civil (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Explosives (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (1)
- Fiduciary (1)
- Fireworks (1)
- Foster parent (1)
- Free exercise (1)
- Guns (1)
- Illegitimate child (1)
- In the matter of Jewish Child Care Association (1)
- Index Crime (1)
- Jehovah's Witness (1)
- Jones v. President & Directors of Georgetown College Inc. (1)
- Judicial authority (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Juvenile court (1)
- Juveniles (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Torts--Rebuttable Presumption Of Child's Incapacity For Contibutory Negligence, Jerry David Hogg
Torts--Rebuttable Presumption Of Child's Incapacity For Contibutory Negligence, Jerry David Hogg
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study In The Judicial Application Of 'The Best Interests Of The Child' Doctrine, Sanford N. Katz
Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study In The Judicial Application Of 'The Best Interests Of The Child' Doctrine, Sanford N. Katz
Sanford N. Katz
No abstract provided.
Problem Of Age And Jurisdiction In The Juvenile Court, C. William Reiney
Problem Of Age And Jurisdiction In The Juvenile Court, C. William Reiney
Vanderbilt Law Review
The waiver provisions produce a conflict between the ideal of the juvenile court that the "best interests" of the child shall be protected and the demand of society that society be protected. Perhaps in so doing, they help define the true role of the juvenile court. The juvenile court is a part of our legal system, a system which must protect many interests of individuals and groups. The juvenile court can do no less. Apparently, the United States Supreme Court in the 1965 term has adopted this view of the juvenile court. The waiver provisions are, thus, a necessary adjunct …
Toward Uniform Guardianship Legislation, William F. Fratcher
Toward Uniform Guardianship Legislation, William F. Fratcher
Michigan Law Review
The Model Probate Code, part IV of which covers guardianship of the persons and property of infants and mental incompetents, was published in 1946 under the auspices of the University of Michigan Law School. It was prepared for the Probate Law Division of the Section of Real Property, Probate, and Trust Law of the American Bar Association by its Model Probate Code Committee in cooperation with the research staff of the Law School. No state has adopted the Model Probate Code in its entirety, but parts of it have been enacted in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, …
A Critical View Of The Uniform Crime Reports, Sophia M. Robison
A Critical View Of The Uniform Crime Reports, Sophia M. Robison
Michigan Law Review
No one would deny that the FBI performs a vital function in investigating, identifying, and tracking down suspects who may endanger the life, liberty, and property of Americans. However, this writer feels that the Uniform Crime Reports published by the FBI should be subjected to a very critical analysis. Of primary concern are the indiscriminate acceptance of the official data by legislators and social science investigators and the doubtful inferences which a frightened public draws from news releases proclaiming that "the U.S. is sitting on a seething volcano of crime."
Review Of Children For Adoption, By Pearl Buck, Sanford N. Katz
Review Of Children For Adoption, By Pearl Buck, Sanford N. Katz
Sanford N. Katz
No abstract provided.
Nociones Generales De Derecho Procesal Civil, Edward Ivan Cueva
Nociones Generales De Derecho Procesal Civil, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
No abstract provided.
Fireworks, Explosives, Guns, And Minors, George Braun
Fireworks, Explosives, Guns, And Minors, George Braun
Cleveland State Law Review
In most of the United States the laws governing the sale and use of fireworks, explosives and flammable decorations follow the form of control regulations recommended by the National Fire Prevention Association. These severely restrict the use of explosives and fireworks (with the exception of paper caps for toy guns) to adults. Ohio has led the trend by imposing safeguards more restrictive than most states and, by recent statutes together with decisions, imposing strict standards against manufacturers, sellers, keepers, users or other handlers of explosives and fireworks in attempts to effectively control the hazards presented by these products.
Buck: Children For Adoption, Sanford N. Katz
Buck: Children For Adoption, Sanford N. Katz
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Children for Adoption by Pearl Buck
Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study In The Judicial Application Of "The Best Interests Of The Child" Doctrine, Sanford N. Katz
Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study In The Judicial Application Of "The Best Interests Of The Child" Doctrine, Sanford N. Katz
Michigan Law Review
A recurring problem which courts face is the need to resolve the conflict which arises when foster parents challenge the decision of agencies that have disqualified these persons from continuing their relationship with or adopting their foster child. This article will explore the role of courts in resolving these disputes and will suggest some criteria by which the courts may be guided in deciding such questions.
Authorization Of Involuntary Blood Transfusion For Adult Jehovah's Witness Held Unconstitutional--In Re Brooks' Estate, Michigan Law Review
Authorization Of Involuntary Blood Transfusion For Adult Jehovah's Witness Held Unconstitutional--In Re Brooks' Estate, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Despite serious illness, plaintiff requested, in accordance with her religious beliefs as a Jehovah's Witness, that blood transfusions not be administered to her. Upon the request of her physician and several assistant state's attorneys, a court-appointed guardian was authorized to consent to a blood transfusion for the plaintiff, and a transfusion was administered. On appeal of the court's action to the Supreme Court of Illinois, held, order reversed. The authorization of a blood transfusion for an adult Jehovah's Witness who has only adult children is an unconstitutional interference with the patient's right to the free exercise of her religion.