Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (3)
- Erie R.R. v. Tompkins (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Labor dispute (2)
- Norris-LaGuardia Act (2)
-
- Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln Mills (2)
- Union (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Appellate court (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Attachment (1)
- Book Review (1)
- Breach (1)
- Chancery (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Collective bargaining (1)
- Collective bargaining agreement (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Compulsory disclosure (1)
- Conformity Act (1)
- Congressional authority (1)
- Contempt cases (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright protection (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Damage (1)
- District court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 21 of 21
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Proceedings In Direct Contempt Cases, Thomas R. Allen
Summary Proceedings In Direct Contempt Cases, Thomas R. Allen
Vanderbilt Law Review
That the "power and majesty" of the law, personified by the court and its decrees, could not be lightly brushed aside even by a prince was a settled fact by the time of Shakespeare; it remains so today. But the proceedings by which such an offense may be punished is another matter. At the present time a large number of contempts are disposed of by summary proceedings. It was not always so, and recently a number of highly respected judges and writers have begun to argue that the practice should be discontinued. This revival of interest is the raison d'etre …
Insanity As A Defense: The Bifurcated Trial, David W. Louisell, Geoffrey Hazard
Insanity As A Defense: The Bifurcated Trial, David W. Louisell, Geoffrey Hazard
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts - Choice Of Law Application Of Federal Law To Government Subcontract In Federal Diversity Case, H. C. Snyder Jr.
Federal Courts - Choice Of Law Application Of Federal Law To Government Subcontract In Federal Diversity Case, H. C. Snyder Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant obtained a government missile contract, and plaintiff was subcontracted to manufacture containers for the missiles. When certain changes in elements of the containers were ordered by the Government, plaintiff demanded an "equitable adjustment" from defendant pursuant to the terms of the subcontract. Defendant paid only the costs of effecting the necessary changes. Plaintiff instituted this suit in federal district court alleging diversity of citizenship and demanding that the adjustment include, as allowed by California law, compensation for overhead losses caused by a partial work stoppage during the delay in effecting the changes. The district court characterized the contract as …
Washington Justice Court System—Constitutionality Of The Fee System Of Compensating Justices Of The Peace, Forest W. Walls
Washington Justice Court System—Constitutionality Of The Fee System Of Compensating Justices Of The Peace, Forest W. Walls
Washington Law Review
In the case of In re Borchert the Washington Supreme Court decided that a person tried before an unsalaried justice of the peace on a criminal charge was not deprived of due process of law because the justice was compensated on a fee basis.
Evidence- Hearsay-Scope Of Federal Rule 43(A), David K. Kroll S. Ed
Evidence- Hearsay-Scope Of Federal Rule 43(A), David K. Kroll S. Ed
Michigan Law Review
The clocktower of plaintiff county's courthouse buckled and collapsed into the courtroom below. Charred timbers were found in the wreckage. Several residents reported that they saw lightning strike the tower five days before the collapse. Plaintiff carried insurance for loss by fire or lightning, and sued the insurers when they denied liability. Defendant claimed that the tower collapsed of its own weight because of faulty design, deterioration, and overloading. To account for the charred timbers defendant introduced into evidence a fifty-eight-year-old newspaper article from the files of the city newspaper describing a fire in the courthouse during its construction. The …
Llewellyn: The Common Law Tradition- Deciding Appeals, Luke K. Cooperrider
Llewellyn: The Common Law Tradition- Deciding Appeals, Luke K. Cooperrider
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Common Law Tradition- Deciding Appeals. By Karl N. Llewellyn.
Compulsory Disclosure And The First Amendment - The Scope Of Judicial Review, Robert B. Kent
Compulsory Disclosure And The First Amendment - The Scope Of Judicial Review, Robert B. Kent
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Involvement of the Supreme Court of the United States with highly charged public issues understandably occasions fresh debate concerning the proper role of the Court in determining questions of ultimate governmental power, in short, debate over the doctrine of judicial review.
As it is sometimes difficult for the judge to distinguish between what is unconstitutional and what is merely unwise, so it is difficult for the critic to disassociate his reaction to the results reached in a given case from his evaluation of the competence of the particular judicial performance. For some the failure to draw such a line robs …
The Court Of Appeals, 1960 Term Opinion Tables, Buffalo Law Review
The Court Of Appeals, 1960 Term Opinion Tables, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Administration, George Neff Stevens
Judicial Administration, George Neff Stevens
Washington Law Review
Covers recent amendments.
Judicial Administration, Charles F. Abbott Jr.
Judicial Administration, Charles F. Abbott Jr.
Washington Law Review
Covers cases on the inherent power of the court—constitutional grant of power—contempt.
Government, Law And Courts In The Soviet Union And Eastern Europe, Edited By Vladimir Gsovski And Kazimierz Grzybowski, Jurij Fedynskyj
Government, Law And Courts In The Soviet Union And Eastern Europe, Edited By Vladimir Gsovski And Kazimierz Grzybowski, Jurij Fedynskyj
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Conflict Of Laws-Law Applicable In Federal Courts-Federal Law Applied To Contractual Relations Of Admiralty Lawyer, Robert E. Thorne S.Ed.
Conflict Of Laws-Law Applicable In Federal Courts-Federal Law Applied To Contractual Relations Of Admiralty Lawyer, Robert E. Thorne S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff attorney was retained by a Spanish seaman to prosecute personal injury claims under the Jones Act and the general maritime law. Defendant shipping company induced the seaman to fire his lawyer and to recover instead under his Spanish employment contract. Plaintiff sued the shipping company in tort for interference with contractual relations. In a federal diversity suit, held, for plaintiff. Federal common law should be applied to determine the validity of the contract and the claim of tortious interference with it. Greenberg v. Panama Transp. Co., 185 F. Supp. 320 (D. Mass. 1960).
No-Strike Clauses In The Federal Courts, Frank H. Stewart
No-Strike Clauses In The Federal Courts, Frank H. Stewart
Michigan Law Review
One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in return for his single undertaking to do - or not to do. It depends upon his bargaining power. His single undertaking may be so valuable that several promises are necessary to induce him to act, or not to act. He is privileged to hold out for the best deal. The law does not examine his motives or reduce his demands. And from this arises the common- law principle that one consideration may support several promises.
Rehearing And The Crowded Docket In The Kentucky Court Of Appeals, Robert G. Zweigart
Rehearing And The Crowded Docket In The Kentucky Court Of Appeals, Robert G. Zweigart
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Presumptions: Phenomena On The Periphery, E. F. Roberts
Presumptions: Phenomena On The Periphery, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In examining the law of evidence relative to the functions served by the device called “rebuttable presumption,” two classes of cases constantly tantalize the analyst and irritate the purist. The first concerns those instances where courts which regularly pay homage at the altar of Thayer suddenly and inexplicably send the question whether a presumption has been rebutted to the trier of fact. The second involves those courts which insist that, while the presumption mechanism does not shift the risk of non-persuasion to the opponent, the question whether the presumption has been rebutted always and quite properly ought to be decided …
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
University of Richmond Law Review
Important amendments to its Rules, effective April 1, 1961, were recently adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Perhaps the change of most interest to trial lawyers was the revision of Rule 3:23 relating to D'epositions and Discovery in Actions at Law.
Copyright Of Textile Designs -- Clarity And Confusion In The Second Circuit, Thomas Ehrlich
Copyright Of Textile Designs -- Clarity And Confusion In The Second Circuit, Thomas Ehrlich
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Labor Law - Norris - Laguardia Act - Federal Courts Without Jurisdiction To Enjoin Strike In Support Of Demand That No Jobs Be Abolished Without Railiway Union's Consent, David G. Hill
Michigan Law Review
Respondent railroad sought authority from the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission to reduce the number of its station agents. Petitioner union not only contested but also demanded of the railroad that the following provision be added to the existing collective bargaining agreement: "No position in existence on December 3, 1957, will be abolished or discontinued except by agreement between the carrier and the organization." The commission thereafter found maintenance of the particular jobs to be wasteful and issued a mandatory order directing their abandonment. When the union prepared to strike in support of its demanded contract provision, the railroad sought …
Dawson: A History Of Lay Judges, Spencer L. Kimball
Dawson: A History Of Lay Judges, Spencer L. Kimball
Michigan Law Review
A Review of A History of Lay Judges . By John P. Dawson
Attachment And Garnishment In The Federal Courts, Brainerd Currie
Attachment And Garnishment In The Federal Courts, Brainerd Currie
Michigan Law Review
Personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligent manufacture of safety fuses used in blasting operations in a coal mine were suffered by Raymond Davis, apparently a citizen of Arkansas. The manufacturer, Ensign-Bickford Company, was a Connecticut corporation that could not be personally served with process within Arkansas. But it happened that two foreign corporations, amenable to process in the state, were indebted in substantial amounts to Ensign-Bickford Company. Accordingly, counsel for Davis, invoking the diversity jurisdiction, filed an action in the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Without issue of summons, the plaintiff, in conformity with Arkansas statutes, …