Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Admiralty- Loss Of Goods - Statutory Exemption Of Owner Of Vessel From Liability
Admiralty- Loss Of Goods - Statutory Exemption Of Owner Of Vessel From Liability
Michigan Law Review
Through the negligence of the chief engineer in putting new coal on top of old coal in a temporary bunker the steamship Galileo was rendered unseaworthy at the time the voyage commenced, catching fire and sinking. The cargo was lost. The plaintiff, cargo owner, sued the owner-operator or the ship in the federal District Court for southern New York for breach of contract to deliver at destination. On certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals the Supreme Court held, in affirming the decree dismissing the libel, that the defendant was relieved from liability under the federal fire statute which …
Carriers -Terminal And Carfloat Bridge - Whether "Terminal" Facilities Or "Interchange" Facilities
Carriers -Terminal And Carfloat Bridge - Whether "Terminal" Facilities Or "Interchange" Facilities
Michigan Law Review
The New York Central R. R. brought a suit in admiralty to recover damages to its carfloat No. 37 resulting from a collision occasioned solely by the negligence of the Long Island R. R.'s tug Talisman and those in charge of her. At the time of the collision the carfloat No. 37 was moored in a carfloat bridge of the Long Island's terminal at Long Island City where it had been received in connection with the transportation in interstate commerce of freight cars and freight. The New York Central had received a notice that the Long Island would not be …
Quasi-Contracts -- Sufficiency Of Technical Benefit
Quasi-Contracts -- Sufficiency Of Technical Benefit
Michigan Law Review
A brokerage house, the R. Co., having purchased stock on margin for the plaintiff, requested a payment of $1100 in order to protect themselves in carrying the account. Doubting the financial stability of R. Co. the plaintiff decided to transfer the account to another firm, the defendant, and accordingly delivered to R. Co. a personal check naming the defendant as payee, at the same time orally directing R. Co. to transfer the stock and check to the defendant and from them receive payment in full. R. Co., however, falsely represented that the check was really theirs and that the plaintiff …
Practice And Procedure -The Effect Of Plaintiff's Pleading On The Doctrine Of Res Ipsa Loquitur
Practice And Procedure -The Effect Of Plaintiff's Pleading On The Doctrine Of Res Ipsa Loquitur
Michigan Law Review
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, originating as an exception to the requirement that the plaintiff must prove the particular acts of negligence causing his injury, is applied at the discretion of the trial judge in cases where the acts of negligence are unknown to plaintiff or proof of them is not available to him. Since the doctrine permits of an inference of negligence from the circumstances of the case, these circumstances must be such as will warrant the inference, and various rules have been evolved to determine this.
Contracts - Mutual Assent - Misrepresentation Of Contents Of Written Offer
Contracts - Mutual Assent - Misrepresentation Of Contents Of Written Offer
Michigan Law Review
The defendant orally agreed to buy a year's supply of gasoline of the plaintiff, it being understood that the agreement was to be put in writing. Plaintiff's agent presented two documents to the defendant, telling him that they embodied the oral agreement, and the defendant signed without reading them. One of the documents was in form a lease of defendant's filling station to plaintiff at a nominal rent. Plaintiff brought suit, based on the lease, for possession of the premises. Held, the lease is invalid. The defendant's negligence in signing without reading is immaterial. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Roth …
Parties- Joinder Of Master And Servant As Defendants
Parties- Joinder Of Master And Servant As Defendants
Michigan Law Review
This was an action against the owner of a taxicab and his driver for damages caused by the negligence of the driver in the course of his employment. A motion for a directed verdict on the ground of misjoinder was overruled. Held, error. Knox v. Redwine, (App. D. C. 1932) 59 F. (2d) 304.
Carriers - Liability Of Interstate Connecting Carriers Governed By Filed Tariff Or Through Bill Of Lading
Michigan Law Review
Goods were shipped from Maine to El Paso, Texas, on a through bill of lading which provided that the carrier in possession of the property described "shall be liable as at common law for any loss thereof or damage thereto." The goods were destroyed by fire, without negligence, while in the possession of the Galveston Wharf Company. This company owned, in addition to certain piers, railroad trackage from these piers to connections with the delivering carrier and other railroads running out of Galveston. Its filed tariff provided that it should be liable only for negligence. Held, the Wharf Company's …