Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Easements - Ways Appurtenant- Requirement Of Contiguity Dec 1931

Easements - Ways Appurtenant- Requirement Of Contiguity

Michigan Law Review

The respondent, in a proceeding to register title, claimed a right of way appurtenant over the land of the petitioner. The tracts in question were separated by a strip of plowed land belonging to a third party and it was argued that, since one terminus of the way did not touch on the respondent's land, the claim should be denied. Held, however, that the way was appurtenant to the close even though the servient estate was not adjacent to the dominant. Jones v. Stevens (Mass. 1931), 177 N.E. 91.


Corporations - Rate Of Interest On Bonds And Interest Coupons After Maturity Dec 1931

Corporations - Rate Of Interest On Bonds And Interest Coupons After Maturity

Michigan Law Review

Defendant issued a series of coupon junior income bonds with interest at 5 per cent payable from income at such times as directors deemed prudent. The bonds and some of the coupons not having been paid at maturity, defendant maker redeemed them thereafter with interest to the redemption date at the contract rate (5 per cent). Plaintiff, holder of bonds and coupons, sues to recover the legal rate of interest (6 per cent) after maturity of bonds and coupons. Held, (1) The local law where payable will be followed as to interest on the bond after maturity (in Massachusetts …


Corporations-Dividends On Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock Jun 1931

Corporations-Dividends On Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff held non-cumulative preferred stock in the defendant corporation. From 1925 through 1928 no dividends were declared upon this stock; although earnings were sufficient they were used instead for property improvements. Since 1928, dividends have been paid regularly on this stock at the specified rate. In 1930 a dividend was declared on the common stock. Plaintiff sued to have this amount paid instead as a dividend on the preferred stock, and to enjoin any payment of dividends on the common stock until full dividends were paid on the non-cumulative preferred stock for the period from 1925 to 1928. Held, …


Fixtures - Conditional Sale-Mortgage- Rights Of Parties Jun 1931

Fixtures - Conditional Sale-Mortgage- Rights Of Parties

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff, holding a real estate mortgage recorded before the defendant's notice of conditional sale, bought in the premises at the foreclosure sale. The defendant claimed plumbing and heating fixtures sold to the mortgagor on a contract of conditional sale, notice of which was properly recorded according to the statute. Held, the defendant's title to the fixtures was not protected as against the plaintiff by the recording under the Massachusetts statute. Waverley Cooperative Bank v. Haner (Mass. 1930) 173 N.E. 699.


Conflict Of Laws-Recognition Of Foreign Alimony Decree Jun 1931

Conflict Of Laws-Recognition Of Foreign Alimony Decree

Michigan Law Review

In 1928, a New York court ordered D, who was suing for annulment of his marriage, to pay alimony pendente lite and attorney's fees to W. This judgment had remained unsatisfied. W, in 1931, brought a bill in equity in Massachusetts asking that D, now a resident of Massachusetts, be ordered to pay the amount due on the judgment. Held, although the local statute (Gen. L., c. 209, sec. 6) did not permit suits at law between husband and wife, that mere circumstance was not sufficient grounds for granting equitable relief on the ground of the inadequacy of the …


Negligence-Proximate Cause-Duty Of Parking Lot Owner To Car Owner Jun 1931

Negligence-Proximate Cause-Duty Of Parking Lot Owner To Car Owner

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff parked his car in defendant's parking lot, which was open to the public although no attendant appears to have been on duty. There was an unguarded excavation about forty feet to the rear of the space chosen by the plaintiff. In preparing to leave the lot, plaintiff cranked his car which, apparently, had been left in reverse. The car backed into the excavation, despite plaintiff's efforts to get it under control, and plaintiff sued the lot owner for injuries resulting. Held, that the defendant parking lot owner was not liable. Fielding v. S. Z. Poli Realty Co. (Mass. …