Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (17)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminology (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Near Eastern Languages and Societies (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Institution
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
-
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Publication
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
-
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- College of Journalism and Mass Communications: Professional Projects (1)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
Politics In The Non-Political Branch, Justin L. Swanson
Politics In The Non-Political Branch, Justin L. Swanson
College of Journalism and Mass Communications: Professional Projects
Across the country there exists a patchwork of legal systems by which judges are appointed retained. In some states, like Illinois, it is a fully political process where judges actively campaign for election to the bench. But a majority of states, including Nebraska, have adopted the Merit Selection System, which attempts to remove politics from these processes. Nevertheless, politics can enter into the retention votes. And when they do, it can be extremely difficult for judges to overcome.
Share Transfer Restrictions In Close Corporations As Mechanisms For Intelligible Corporate Outcomes, Stephen J. Leacock
Share Transfer Restrictions In Close Corporations As Mechanisms For Intelligible Corporate Outcomes, Stephen J. Leacock
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Freewheelin' Judiciary: A Bob Dylan Anthology, Alex B. Long
The Freewheelin' Judiciary: A Bob Dylan Anthology, Alex B. Long
Scholarly Works
This paper, presented as part of a symposium on Bob Dylan and the Law at the Fordham University School of Law, explores the ways in which judges have used the lyrics of Bob Dylan in their opinions.
Judges, Lawyers, And A Predictive Theory Of Legal Complexity, Benjamin H. Barton
Judges, Lawyers, And A Predictive Theory Of Legal Complexity, Benjamin H. Barton
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article uses public choice theory and the new institutionalism to discuss the incentives, proclivities, and shared backgrounds of lawyers and judges. In America every law-making judge has a single unifying characteristic; each is a former lawyer. This shared background has powerful and unexplored effects on the shape and structure of American law. This Article argues that the common interests, thought-processes, training, and incentives of Judges and lawyers lead inexorably to greater complexity in judge-made law. These same factors lead to the following prediction: judge-created law will be most complex in areas where a) elite lawyers regularly practice; b) judges …
Comments On [Israeli] Proposal For Structuring Judicial Discretion In Sentencing, Paul H. Robinson
Comments On [Israeli] Proposal For Structuring Judicial Discretion In Sentencing, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, Professor Robinson supports the current Israeli proposal for structuring judicial discretion in sentencing, in particular its reliance upon desert as the guiding principle for the distribution of punishment, its reliance upon benchmarks, or “starting-points,” to be adjusted in individual cases by reference to articulated mitigating and aggravating circumstances, and the proposal’s suggestion to use of an expert committee to draft the original guidelines.
Listening To Victims, Jayne W. Barnard
Global Civil Procedure Trends In The Twenty-First Century, Scott Dodson
Global Civil Procedure Trends In The Twenty-First Century, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
Recent scholarship in comparative civil procedure has identified
“American exceptionalism” as a way to describe practices which set the
United States apart from most of the world, particularly the civil law world.
This Article focuses on two areas of “exceptionalism”: pleading standards
and the role of judges. Specifically, pleading requirements are considerably
less strict in the United States compared to other countries. Additionally,
U.S. judges are less active in conducting litigation than their counterparts
elsewhere, especially judges in the civil law tradition. This Article traces
some modern trends toward convergence between the United States and
the rest of the world. …
Judicial Opinion Writing: An Annotated Bibliography, Ruth C. Vance
Judicial Opinion Writing: An Annotated Bibliography, Ruth C. Vance
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Electing Our Judges And Judicial Independence: The Supreme Court's "Triple Whammy", Martin Belsky
Electing Our Judges And Judicial Independence: The Supreme Court's "Triple Whammy", Martin Belsky
Akron Law Faculty Publications
In this article, Martin Belsky makes the case for judicial selection based on merit, as opposed to popular elections. Belsky cites Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company and the recent defeat of three Iowa supreme court justices because of their opinion in a controversial gay marriage case for the proposition that judicial elections can, and do, yield unjust results. Belsky asserts the need for judicial independence, but concludes that this goal is not achievable through elections because of the "triple whammy" of constitutional limitations: (1) the First Amendment protection of the right of judges and judicial candidates to give specific, …
Judicial Retirement And Return To Practice, Mary Clark
Judicial Retirement And Return To Practice, Mary Clark
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This Article engages recent scholarly debates about U.S. Supreme Court tenure and retirement practices, specifically those concerning the merits of adopting eighteen-year term limits or mandatory retirement for Supreme Court Justices. It broadens the discussion by including all Article III judges and by addressing former Article III judges’ return to practice following resignation or retirement, which has been largely ignored in the literature to date despite what I have found to be the return-to-practice rate of over forty percent in the last two decades.
This Article advocates retaining life tenure because it promotes institutional and individual judicial independence better than …
Empathy's White Elephant: Responding To The Subprime Mortgage Crisis Without Denigrating The Poor, Adam J. Macleod
Empathy's White Elephant: Responding To The Subprime Mortgage Crisis Without Denigrating The Poor, Adam J. Macleod
Faculty Articles
Empathy is the new coverture. Before state legislatures abolished it in the nineteenth century, the plea of coverture nullified any attempts by a married woman to exercise sovereignty over her property. Just as coverture did to married women, the now-well-known call for empathy in our nation's judgments threatens to deny poor borrowers, as a class, the freedom and responsibility to manage their assets. Empathy, as the ideal judge would employ it, would impede the agency of, and thus denigrate, persons within that class. The injustice (and ground for the ultimate abolition) of coverture arose from its failure to respect women …
An Essay On Torts: States Of Argument, Marshall S. Shapo
An Essay On Torts: States Of Argument, Marshall S. Shapo
Faculty Working Papers
This essay summarizes high points in torts scholarship and case law over a period of two generations, highlighting the "states of argument" that have characterized tort law over that period. It intertwines doctrine and policy. Its doctrinal features include the tradtional spectrum of tort liability, the duty question, problems of proof, and the relative incoherency of damages rules. Noting the cross-doctrinal role of tort as a solver of functional problems, it focuses on major issues in products liability and medical malpractice. The essay discusses such elements of policy as the role of power in tort law, the tension between communitarianism …
Acus 2.0 And Its Historical Antecedents, Jeffrey Lubbers
Acus 2.0 And Its Historical Antecedents, Jeffrey Lubbers
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Advice And Consent Vs. Silence And Dissent? The Contrasting Roles Of The Legislature In U.S. And U.K. Judicial Appointments, Mary Clark
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The Senate‘s role in judicial appointments has come under increasingly withering criticism for its uninformative and spectacle-like nature. At the same time, Britain has established two new judicial appointment processes - to accompany its new Supreme Court and existing lower courts - in which Parliament plays no role. This Article seeks to understand the reasons for the inclusion and exclusion of the legislature in the U.S. and U.K. judicial appointment processes adopted at the creation of their respective Supreme Courts.
The Article proceeds by highlighting the ideas and concerns motivating inclusion of the legislature in judicial appointments in the early …
The Persistent Cultural Script Of Judicial Dispassion, Terry A. Maroney
The Persistent Cultural Script Of Judicial Dispassion, Terry A. Maroney
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In contemporary Western jurisprudence it is never appropriate for emotion - anger, love, hatred, sadness, disgust, fear, joy - to affect judicial decision-making. A good judge should feel no emotion; if she does, she puts it aside. To call a judge emotional is a stinging insult, signifying a failure of discipline, impartiality, and reason. Insistence on judicial dispassion is a cultural script of unusual longevity and potency. But not only is the script wrong as a matter of human nature - emotion does not, in fact, invariably tend toward sloppiness, bias, and irrationality - but it is not quite so …
Emotional Regulation And Judicial Behavior, Terry A. Maroney
Emotional Regulation And Judicial Behavior, Terry A. Maroney
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Judges are human and experience emotion when hearing cases, though the standard account of judging long has denied that fact. In the post-Realist era it is possible to acknowledge that judges have emotional reactions to their work, yet our legal culture continues to insist that a good judge firmly puts those reactions aside. Thus, we expect judges to regulate their emotions, either by preventing emotion’s emergence or by walling off its influence. But judges are given precisely no direction as to how to engage in emotional regulation.
This Article proposes a model for judicial emotion regulation that goes beyond a …
White Male Heterosexist Norms In The Confirmation Process, Theresa M. Beiner
White Male Heterosexist Norms In The Confirmation Process, Theresa M. Beiner
Faculty Scholarship
Justice Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearing took a controversial turn when commentators picked up on a reference in the New York Times to a portion of a speech she gave in 2001. In that speech, then Judge Sotomayor opined that, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." That statement, along with her participation in the per curiam decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, caused a minor storm during her confirmation. More recently, former Harvard Dean and former …
Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again., Charles G. Geyh
Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again., Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Paul Verkuil's Projects For The Administrative Conference Of The U.S. 1974-1992, Jeffrey Lubbers
Paul Verkuil's Projects For The Administrative Conference Of The U.S. 1974-1992, Jeffrey Lubbers
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
I am really happy to be part of this tribute to Paul Verkuil. It may surprise those in the audience to learn that I am bringing some needed diversity to today's proceedings - I am the only other Dutch American on the program! But perhaps my twenty years at the "Administrative Conference" also qualifies me to say a few words about how thrilled I am that we have it back - "ACUS 2.0" we can call it, complete with a website this time- and that Paul is at its helm. And I want to thank Paul for bringing me back …
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) from a social psychological perspective, and empirically studies Iqbal’s effect on claims of race discrimination.
In Twombly and then Iqbal, the Court recast Rule 8 from a notice-based rule into a plausibility standard. Under Iqbal, federal judges must evaluate whether each complaint contains sufficient factual matter “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” When doing so, Iqbal requires judges to draw on their “judicial experience and common sense.” Courts apply Iqbal at the pleading stage, before evidence has been …
Lies, Damned Lies, And Judicial Empathy, Mary Anne Franks
Lies, Damned Lies, And Judicial Empathy, Mary Anne Franks
Articles
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Bob Dylan And The Law, Foreword, Samuel J. Levine
Symposium: Bob Dylan And The Law, Foreword, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.