Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federalism Lives! Reflections On The Vitality Of The Federal System In The Context Of Natural Resource Regulation, Patrick Mcginley
Federalism Lives! Reflections On The Vitality Of The Federal System In The Context Of Natural Resource Regulation, Patrick Mcginley
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Oliver V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Oliver V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Michigan V. Clifford, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Michigan V. Clifford, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Welsh V. Wisconsin, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Welsh V. Wisconsin, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Patton V. Yount, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Kirkpatrick V. Christian Home Of Abilene, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Kirkpatrick V. Christian Home Of Abilene, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Solem V. Bartlett, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Intertwining The Constitution And The Common Law: Evolving Doctrines Of Defamation In Arkansas, Rodney A. Smolla
Intertwining The Constitution And The Common Law: Evolving Doctrines Of Defamation In Arkansas, Rodney A. Smolla
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
"The Right Of The People": Reconciling Collective And Individual Interests Under The Fourth Amendment, Donald L. Doernberg
"The Right Of The People": Reconciling Collective And Individual Interests Under The Fourth Amendment, Donald L. Doernberg
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Professor Doernberg examines a tension within fourth amendment jurisprudence and sugqests a means of resolving it. On the one hand, the Supreme Court has conferred fourth amendment standing only upon those whose personal privacy interests have been disturbed. On the other hand, the Court has allowed such persons to invoke the exclusionary rule only in circumstances where, in the Court's view, it would serve as an effective deterrent. Professor Doernberg traces these two po1icies to different conceptions of the fourth amendment: the first interprets the amendment as a guarantor of individual rights; the second construes it as an instrument for …
U.S. Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. States Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Partii, Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. States Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Partii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.