Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Searches and Seizures (2)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (2)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (403 U.S. 388 (1971)) (1)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (1)
-
- Civil Rights (1)
- Criminal Justice System (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Decision Making in Prosecution (1)
- Law Enforcement (1)
- Mass Incarceration (1)
- Mexican-American border region (1)
- Miranda Rights (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 440 (1966)) (1)
- Police (1)
- Police Brutality (1)
- Police Questioning (1)
- Police Reform (1)
- Police Shootings (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Qualified Immunity of Public Officers (1)
- Race Discrimination in Law Enforcement (1)
- Remedies (Law) (1)
- Rhode Island v. Innis (446 U.S. 291 (1980)) (1)
- Self-Incrimination (1)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (1)
- United States. Border Patrol (1)
- United States. Supreme Court (1)
- Virginia (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief Of Amici Curiae Professors Katherine Mims Crocker And Brandon Hasbrouck In Support Of Neither Party With Respect To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss, Katherine Mims Crocker, Brandon Hasbrouk
Brief Of Amici Curiae Professors Katherine Mims Crocker And Brandon Hasbrouck In Support Of Neither Party With Respect To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss, Katherine Mims Crocker, Brandon Hasbrouk
Briefs
No abstract provided.
Case Preview: When Is A Fleeing Suspect “Seized”?, Jeffrey Bellin
Case Preview: When Is A Fleeing Suspect “Seized”?, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable “searches” and “seizures.” On Wednesday, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in Torres v. Madrid, a case that will provide important guidance on what constitutes a Fourth Amendment seizure. Here’s a rundown of the case starting with the relevant facts and procedural history, followed by a discussion of the legal issues and finally a couple of things to watch for at the argument.
The Changing Role Of The American Prosecutor, Jeffrey Bellin
The Changing Role Of The American Prosecutor, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
When Is Police Interrogation Really Police Interrogation? A Look At The Application Of The Miranda Mandate, Paul Marcus
When Is Police Interrogation Really Police Interrogation? A Look At The Application Of The Miranda Mandate, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
It seemed so clear a half-century ago. After years of frustration reviewing the voluntariness of confessions on a case-by-case basis, a Supreme Court majority in Miranda v. Arizona held that incriminating statements resulting from interrogation while in custody would not be admissible at trial to prove guilt unless warnings were given to advise a suspect of rights of silence and an attorney. It is disappointing to report that if anything has been established over the past 50 years, it is that this mandate isn't clear at all. It turns out that police officers do not necessarily give exactly the warnings …
Improving Community Safety Means Addressing Police Violence As A Public Health Problem, Kami Chavis, Josh Horwitz
Improving Community Safety Means Addressing Police Violence As A Public Health Problem, Kami Chavis, Josh Horwitz
Popular Media
JURIST Guest Columnists from the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence Kami Chavis, a law professor at Wake Forest University, and Josh Horwitz, the Fund's executive director, discuss ways to address systemic police violence against people of color.
Justices Make The Tough-- But Right-- Call In Cross-Border Shooting Case, A. Benjamin Spencer
Justices Make The Tough-- But Right-- Call In Cross-Border Shooting Case, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.