Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Multi-Jurisdictional Review Of Legislative And Regulatory Changes In Relation To The Banking/Commercial Separation Doctrine, And The Business Of Banking, Cristie Ford
All Faculty Publications
Banks have long provided essential services to the economy and to Canadians. In return, they have had access to special privileges, and been subject to special prohibitions. Across the world, there are boundaries around what we in Canada would call the “business of banking”. Such boundaries are important, because they set the conditions under which institutions may be recognized as “banks,” and may have access to those privileges and prohibitions. This report summarizes research undertaken across five jurisdictions – Australia, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US, federal level only) – with respect to a particular …
The Banking/Commercial Separation Doctrine In Comparative Perspective, Cristie Ford
The Banking/Commercial Separation Doctrine In Comparative Perspective, Cristie Ford
All Faculty Publications
This report, prepared for the Department of Finance, Government of Canada, summarizes research undertaken across five jurisdictions – Australia, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US, federal level only) – with respect to a particular kind of boundary on the business of banking: the separation of banking business from commercial business. “Commercial” here means the provision of non-financial goods and services. This separation exists under what in the United States has long been referred to as the “banking/commercial separation doctrine”. The report considers the historical justifications for the doctrine in the context of the modern “business …
Regulating Systemic Risk In Canada, Anita Anand, Maziar Peihani
Regulating Systemic Risk In Canada, Anita Anand, Maziar Peihani
All Faculty Publications
This chapter is a contribution to an interdisciplinary book that drew on some of the world's leading experts on financial stability and regulation to examine and critique the progress made since 2008 in addressing systemic risk. The chapter contends that Canadian regulators’ ability to address systemic risk is limited by the structure of the regime, built on a sector-by-sector model, without any one institution responsible for comprehensively regulating the financial system. We also posit the proposal to establish a macroprudential regulator to monitor the financial system as a whole, as advocated by academic literature and international forums, is unlikely …