Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hairr V. First Judicial Dist. Ct., 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 16 (Mar. 10, 2016), Douglas H. Smith
Hairr V. First Judicial Dist. Ct., 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 16 (Mar. 10, 2016), Douglas H. Smith
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district court’s discretion. If granted, this writ would have compelled the district court to grant the petitioners’ application to intervene under Rule 24 of the Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure as defendants in a constitutional challenge to a program that awards grants to children who are educated by entities other than public schools. The State is presumed to adequately represent the interests of those who support the bill. Since they did not demonstrate a conflict of interest with the State’s position or present an argument …
Golightly & Vannah, Pllc V. Tj Allen, Llc, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 41 (Jun. 2, 2016), Baylie Hellman
Golightly & Vannah, Pllc V. Tj Allen, Llc, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 41 (Jun. 2, 2016), Baylie Hellman
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In order for attorneys working on a contingency basis to comply with NRS 18.015’s requirement of perfecting a lien before receiving the funds, the notice of the lien must disclose the agreed upon contingency percentage and also claim court costs and out-of-pocket costs advanced by the attorney in an amount to be determined.