Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Education Policy (1)
- Educational Sociology (1)
- Inequality and Stratification (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Policy History, Theory, and Methods (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- Race and Ethnicity (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Institution
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Interpretation, Jamal Greene
Interpretation, Jamal Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Interpretation is the means by which the Constitution and its clauses are brought to bear on actual cases and controversies. Although much of the Constitution appears self-explanatory, as with its requirement that the president be at least thirty-five years old, much is subject to reasonable disagreement. The approaches to interpretation that form this chapter’s subject are the main tools scholars and judges have developed to resolve that disagreement. Those tools encompass five domains of argumentation, broadly conceived: text, history, structure, precedent, and consequences. As a general matter, interpretation that draws on resources wholly outside these five domains — via an …
"Law Is Coercion": Revisiting Judicial Power To Provide Equality In Public Education, José F. Anderson
"Law Is Coercion": Revisiting Judicial Power To Provide Equality In Public Education, José F. Anderson
All Faculty Scholarship
This article is an attempt to start a conversation about where we find ourselves in the plight to help our most challenged public schools. It is not intended to be a comprehensive solution to the problem, but rather a hard look at how, after decades of many efforts, we are further away from the equal education contemplated by the United States Supreme Court's historic decision in Brown v. Board of Education. This article does not desire to simply cast blame for the failures of our children, but to send a reminder that, as Frederick Douglass would say, we can hardly …
The Ironies Of Affirmative Action, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
The Ironies Of Affirmative Action, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s most recent confrontation with race-based affirmative action, Fisher v. University of Texas, did not live up to people’s expectations—or their fears. The Court did not explicitly change the current approach in any substantial way. It did, however, signal that it wants race-based affirmative action to be subject to real strict scrutiny, not the watered-down version featured in Grutter v. Bollinger. That is a significant signal, because under real strict scrutiny, almost all race-based affirmative action programs are likely unconstitutional. This is especially true given the conceptual framework the Court has created for such programs—the way …