Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Equality (2)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Defense of Marriage Act (1)
-
- Delegation of powers (1)
- Discrimination in employment (1)
- Discrimination—Law and legislation (1)
- Donation of organs (1)
- Donation of organs tissues etc. (1)
- Etc.--Law and legislation (1)
- Federal government (1)
- Feminist jurisprudence (1)
- Human reproductive technology--Law and legislation (1)
- Kamakachi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1)
- Monopsonies (1)
- Price fixing (1)
- Same-sex marriage—Law and legislation (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Tissues (1)
- United States (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is There A Federal Definitions Power?, Ernest A. Young
Is There A Federal Definitions Power?, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
Although the Supreme Court decided United States v. Windsor on equal protection grounds, that case also raised important and recurring questions about federal power. In particular, defenders of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) argued that Congress may always define the terms used in federal statutes, even if its definition concerns a matter reserved to the States. As the DOMA illustrates, federal definitions concerning reserved matters that depart from state law may impose significant burdens on state governments and private citizens alike. This Article argues that there is no general, freestanding federal definitions power and that sometimes—as with marriage—federal law …
Title Vii At 50: Contemporary Challenges For U.S. Employment Discrimination Law, Trina Jones
Title Vii At 50: Contemporary Challenges For U.S. Employment Discrimination Law, Trina Jones
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Kamakahi V. Asrm: The Egg Donor Price Fixing Litigation, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Kamakahi V. Asrm: The Egg Donor Price Fixing Litigation, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Faculty Scholarship
In April 2011, Lindsay Kamakahi caused an international stir by suing the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), SART-member fertility clinics, and a number of egg donor agencies on behalf of herself and other oocyte donors. The suit challenged the ASRM-SART oocyte donor compensation guidelines, which limit payments to egg donors to $5,000 ($10,000 under special circumstances), as an illegal price-fixing agreement in violation of United States antitrust laws.
Ensuing discussion of the case has touched on familiar debates surrounding coercion, commodification, and exploitation. It has also revealed many misconceptions about oocyte donation, …
Objectivity: A Feminist Revisit, Katharine T. Bartlett
Objectivity: A Feminist Revisit, Katharine T. Bartlett
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.