Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Courts (6)
- Abstention (1)
- Access (1)
- Amicus Brief (1)
- Amicus curiae (1)
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Article III (1)
- Behavioral (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Contemporary politics (1)
- Deliberation (1)
- Dockets (1)
- Doctrine (1)
- Dynamic efficiency (1)
- Election law (1)
- Empirical (1)
- Essential facilities doctrine (1)
- FECA (1)
- Federal Election Commission Act (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal judiciary (1)
- Graph theory (1)
- Incentives (1)
- Interconnection access (1)
- Interest group (1)
- Judicial decisionmaking (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Long-term interests (1)
- Lujan v. Akins (1)
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
What's Left Standing? Feca Citizen Suits And The Battle For Judicial Review, Kimberly L. Wehle
What's Left Standing? Feca Citizen Suits And The Battle For Judicial Review, Kimberly L. Wehle
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article discusses standing to sue the FEC with two principal objectives. First, it attempts to frame the doctrinal inconsistencies between Lujan and Akins that have given rise to ongoing FECA standing litigation and concludes that the Supreme Court should acknowledge its repudiation of Lujan in cases seeking election-related information. Second, it explores the question whether courts may be statutorily required to consider citizen challenges to FEC enforcement actions as a matter of justiciability theory in the first instance, and concludes that courts should turn to the oft-overlooked Akins decision in lieu of Lujan in reviewing suits brought under citizen-suit …
A Report On Chicago's Felony Courts: Executive Summary (Chicago Appleseed Fund For Justice Criminal Justice Project, December 2007) (Member Of Advisory Board), Daniel T. Coyne
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Report On Chicago's Felony Courts (Chicago Appleseed Fund For Justice Criminal Justice Project, December 2007) (Member Of Advisory Board)., Daniel T. Coyne
A Report On Chicago's Felony Courts (Chicago Appleseed Fund For Justice Criminal Justice Project, December 2007) (Member Of Advisory Board)., Daniel T. Coyne
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Early Panel Announcement, Settlement And Adjudication, Samuel P. Jordan
Early Panel Announcement, Settlement And Adjudication, Samuel P. Jordan
All Faculty Scholarship
Federal appellate courts have significant discretion to set the internal policies that govern the appeals process, and they have used that discretion to institute policies designed to combat increasing caseloads. This Article takes a close look at one such policy: early announcement of panel composition in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. In stark contrast to every other circuit, the D.C. Circuit announces panel composition to litigants in civil appeals well in advance of oral argument, and it does so at least in part to encourage settlement and control the court's workload. This Article concludes that although there are indications …
Amicus Briefs, Kenneth Lasson
The Effect Of Judicial Expedience On Attorney Fees In Class Actions, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
The Effect Of Judicial Expedience On Attorney Fees In Class Actions, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
All Faculty Scholarship
Judges facing exogenous constraints on their pecuniary income have an incentive to reduce their workload to increase their private welfare. In the face of an increase in caseload, this incentive will induce judges to attempt to terminate some cases more rapidly. In class action cases, failing to grant an attorney fee request will delay termination. This conflict is likely to lead judges to authorize higher fees as court congestion increases. Using two data sets of class action settlements, we show that attorney fees are significantly and positively related to the congestion level of the court hearing the case.
Chief Justice Rehnquist's Appointments To The Fisa Court: An Empirical Perspective, Theodore Ruger
Chief Justice Rehnquist's Appointments To The Fisa Court: An Empirical Perspective, Theodore Ruger
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Who Writes The Rules For Hostile Takeovers, And Why? The Peculiar Divergence Of Us And Uk Takeover Regulation, John Armour, David A. Skeel Jr.
Who Writes The Rules For Hostile Takeovers, And Why? The Peculiar Divergence Of Us And Uk Takeover Regulation, John Armour, David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Retroactivity Retrospective, With Thoughts For The Future: What The Supreme Court Learned From Paul Mishkin, And What It Might, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
A Retroactivity Retrospective, With Thoughts For The Future: What The Supreme Court Learned From Paul Mishkin, And What It Might, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability And Interbranch Relations, Stephen B. Burbank
Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability And Interbranch Relations, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
In this paper I argue that the main cause of the poisonous state of interbranch relations involving the federal judiciary, as of the frequent and strident attacks on courts, federal and state, are strategies calculated to persuade the public that courts are part of ordinary politics and thus that judges are policy agents to be held accountable as such. Although unremarkable in the sense that a breakdown in norms of interdependency is a defining characteristic of contemporary politics, I regard the current situation involving the federal judiciary as remarkably dangerous because of the possibility that a tipping point of no …
Judicial Activism And Its Critics, Kermit Roosevelt Iii, Richard Garnett
Judicial Activism And Its Critics, Kermit Roosevelt Iii, Richard Garnett
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Deliberative Dilemmas: A Critique Of Deliberation Day From The Perspective Of Election Law, Chad Flanders
Deliberative Dilemmas: A Critique Of Deliberation Day From The Perspective Of Election Law, Chad Flanders
All Faculty Scholarship
My paper deals with two subject areas - deliberative democracy theory and election law - that have had surprisingly little contact with another. My paper tries to remedy this lacuna by looking at how the two fields intersect and can contribute to the understanding of one another. In particular, I look in detail at a particularly prominent proposal by two political theorists, Bruce Ackerman and James Fishkin's Deliberation Day, and how the aims of that proposal might be frustrated by the present structure of American election law. I argue that because they fail to take into account certain structural features …
Originalism And Its Discontents (Plus A Thought Or Two About Abortion), Mitchell N. Berman
Originalism And Its Discontents (Plus A Thought Or Two About Abortion), Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Docketology, District Courts And Doctrine, David A. Hoffman, Alan J. Izenman, Jeffrey Lidicker
Docketology, District Courts And Doctrine, David A. Hoffman, Alan J. Izenman, Jeffrey Lidicker
All Faculty Scholarship
Empirical legal scholars have traditionally modeled trial court judicial opinion writing by assuming that judges act rationally, seeking to maximize their influence by writing opinions in politically important cases. Support for this hypothesis has reviewed published trial court opinions, finding that civil rights and other "hot" topics are more likely to be explained than purportedly ordinary legal problems involved in resolving social security and commercial law cases. This orthodoxy comforts consumers of legal opinions, because it suggests that they are largely representative of judicial work. To test such views, we collected data from a thousand cases in four different jurisdictions. …
Mandating Access To Telecom And The Internet: The Hidden Side Of Trinko, Daniel F. Spulber, Christopher S. Yoo
Mandating Access To Telecom And The Internet: The Hidden Side Of Trinko, Daniel F. Spulber, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Antitrust has long played a major role in telecommunications policy, demonstrated most dramatically by the equal access mandate imposed during the breakup of AT&T. In this Article we explore the extent to which antitrust can continue to serve as a source of access mandates following the Supreme Court's 2004 Trinko decision. Although Trinko sharply criticized access remedies and antitrust courts' ability to enforce them, it is not yet clear whether future courts will interpret the opinion as barring all antitrust access claims. Even more importantly, the opinion contains language hinting at possible bases for differentiating among different types of access, …