Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Act of 1933 (1)
- Capital formation (1)
- Case law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Cyber-business start-ups (1)
-
- Dotcom litigation (1)
- E-sign legislation (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- In re Unity Gold Corp. (1)
- Integration (1)
- Integration doctrine (1)
- Internet use agreements (1)
- Investing (1)
- Investor (1)
- SEC (1)
- Scientific evidence (1)
- Secured transactions (1)
- Securities (1)
- Securities Act of1933 (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- Split (1)
- UETA (1)
- Unity Gold (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
3rd Annual Computer & Technology Law Institute, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law
3rd Annual Computer & Technology Law Institute, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law
Continuing Legal Education Materials
Materials from the 3rd Annual Computer & Technology Law Institute held by UK/CLE in March 2001.
The Overwhelming Case For Elimination Of The Integration Doctrine Under The Securities Act Of 1933, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
The Overwhelming Case For Elimination Of The Integration Doctrine Under The Securities Act Of 1933, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The thesis of this Article is that the Securities and Exchange Commission should entirely eliminate the integration doctrine from the Securities Act of1933. Under the integration doctrine, a single "offering" or "issue" of securities cannot be split. The doctrine is expensive for society and furthers no valid policy of the 1933 Act. More specifically, the doctrine does not promote investor protection but does retard capital formation, an outcome that is contrary to the presently articulated purposes of the 1933 Act.
Part II of this Article traces the history of the adoption of the integration doctrine both by the Commission and …