Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constructing The Substantive Constitution, James E. Fleming
Constructing The Substantive Constitution, James E. Fleming
Faculty Scholarship
I. Introduction A. The Flights from Substance in Constitutional Theory A specter is haunting constitutional theory-the specter of Lochner v. New York.' In the Lochner era, the Supreme Court gave heightened judicial protection to substantive economic liberties through the Due Process Clauses.2 In 1937, during the constitutional revolution wrought by the New Deal, West Coast Hotel v. Parrish3 officially repudiated the Lochner era, marking the first death of substantive due process.4 Nevertheless, the ghost of Lochner has perturbed constitutional theory ever since, manifesting itself in charges that judges are "Lochnering" by imposing their own substantive fundamental values in the guise …
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
Thayer Versus Marshall, Gary S. Lawson
Thayer Versus Marshall, Gary S. Lawson
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Nagel's intriguing paper1 suggests that James Bradley Thayer's clear error rule of constitutional adjudication 2 is not an effective vehicle for controlling, and indeed may even exacerbate, the tendency toward invective that often characterizes modem court decisions and legal arguments. Professor Nagel is too charitable. To the extent that Thayer's article has had an influence on either the style or substance of modem constitutional law, that influence has been even more pernicious than Professor Nagel lets on. The source of that problem, however, is less the clear error rule itself than the premises that generate and, in Thayer's view, …