Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (17)
- Congress (4)
- Admissibility (2)
- Church and State (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
-
- Freedom of speech (2)
- Labor unions (2)
- Law reform (2)
- National Labor Relations Act (2)
- Police (2)
- Searches (2)
- Seizures (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Tax Exemptions (2)
- 1965 Voting Rights Act (1)
- 42 U.S.C. sec. 1988 (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Adjacent landowners (1)
- Administrative discretion (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative process (1)
- Administrative rationality (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Artificial water (1)
- Artificial watercourses (1)
- Attorney fees (1)
- Bankamerica Corp. v. United States (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (1)
Articles 1 - 28 of 28
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Intellectual Development Of The American Doctrine Of Judicial Review, Pnina Lahav
The Intellectual Development Of The American Doctrine Of Judicial Review, Pnina Lahav
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And Private Schools: An Update, Neal Devins
The Supreme Court And Private Schools: An Update, Neal Devins
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Trends And Developments With Respect To That Amendment 'Central To Enjoyment Of Other Guarantees Of The Bill Of Rights', Yale Kamisar
Articles
Seventy years ago, in the famous Weeks case,' the Supreme Court evoked a storm of controversy by promulgating the federal exclusionary rule. When, a half-century later, in the landmark Mapp case,2 the Court extended the Weeks rule to state criminal proceedings, at least one experienced observer assumed that the controversy "today finds its end." 3 But as we all know now, Mapp only intensified the controversy. Indeed, in recent years spirited debates over proposals to modify the exclusionary rule or to scrap it entirely have filled the air - and the law reviews.'
Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins
Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins
A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Controlling The Structural Injunction, Robert F. Nagel
Controlling The Structural Injunction, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Do Government Rights Prevail, Or Are Shoshone Indians Trespassers In Their Own Country?, Richard B. Collins
Do Government Rights Prevail, Or Are Shoshone Indians Trespassers In Their Own Country?, Richard B. Collins
Publications
No abstract provided.
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins
What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins
Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Miranda: The Case, The Man, And The Players, Yale Kamisar
Miranda: The Case, The Man, And The Players, Yale Kamisar
Reviews
On the eve of America's bicentennial, the American Bar Association told its members of a plan to publish a book about the "milestone events" in 200 years of American legal history, and invited them to vote on the milestones to be included. When the balloting was over, Miranda v. Arizona1 - "the high-water mark" of the Warren Court's revolution in American criminal procedure2 - had received the fourth highest number of votes.3 I venture to say that if members of the general public had been asked to list the "most regrettable" or "most unfortunate" milestones in American legal history, Miranda …
The Place Of Agencies In Government: Separation Of Powers And The Fourth Branch, Peter L. Strauss
The Place Of Agencies In Government: Separation Of Powers And The Fourth Branch, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
For the past few years the Supreme Court has been struggling with issues of government structure so fundamental that they might have been thought textbook simple, yet with results that seem to imperil the everyday exercise of law-administration. Under what circumstances can Congress assign the adjudication of contested issues in the first instance to tribunals that are not article III courts? The past century has witnessed the profuse growth of legislation assigning to special adjudicative tribunals – administrative agencies and other article I courts – the power to hold trial-type hearings that might otherwise have been placed in the article …
The Bildisco Case And The Congressional Response, James J. White
The Bildisco Case And The Congressional Response, James J. White
Articles
Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act authorizes one in bankruptcy to "assume or reject any executory contract ...of the debtor." The most frequent use of the section arises when a lessee goes into Chapter 11 and decides either to reject its real estate lease with its lessor or, if the lease is at a favorable rental rate, to assume it and assign it to another. A less frequent but more controversial use of section 365 is to reject one's collective bargaining agreement with his employees.
Legislative Formality, Administrative Rationality, Harold H. Bruff
Legislative Formality, Administrative Rationality, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
On Complaining About The Burger Court, Robert F. Nagel
On Complaining About The Burger Court, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Surface Rights In Artificial Watercourses, James N. Corbridge Jr.
Surface Rights In Artificial Watercourses, James N. Corbridge Jr.
Publications
No abstract provided.
Financial Institution Interlocks After The Bankamerica Case, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Financial Institution Interlocks After The Bankamerica Case, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
No abstract provided.
Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun
Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
How Useful Is Judicial Review In Free Speech Cases?, Robert F. Nagel
How Useful Is Judicial Review In Free Speech Cases?, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Gates, 'Probable Cause', 'Good Faith', And Beyond, Yale Kamisar
Gates, 'Probable Cause', 'Good Faith', And Beyond, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Illinois v. Gates1 was the most eagerly awaited constitutional-criminal procedure case of the 1982 Term. I think it fair to say, however, that it was awaited a good deal more eagerly by law enforcement officials and the Americans for Effective Law Enforcement than by defense lawyers and the American Civil Liberties Union. As it turned out, of course, the Gates Court, to the disappointment of many, did not reach the question whether the exclusionary rule in search and seizure cases should be modified so as not to require the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment when …
The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine At Constitutional Crossroads, Nelson E. Roth, Scott E. Sundby
The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine At Constitutional Crossroads, Nelson E. Roth, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Spinning The Legislative Veto, Girardeau A. Spann
Spinning The Legislative Veto, Girardeau A. Spann
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
I am delighted to have been given the opportunity to comment on Judge Breyer's proposal for a fast-track substitute to the legislative veto. Although the Supreme Court invalidated the legislative veto device in INS v. Chadha, Judge Breyer's proposal demonstrates that innovative thinking may well permit those with enough determination to circumvent the apparent effect of the Court's decision. Even more important, the proposal illustrates why such circumvention is possible.
As a doctrinal matter, the legislative veto poses a real dilemma--one that is rooted in fundamental uncertainty about the proper relationship between the Supreme Court and the elected branches of …
Discrimination Bans Demonstrate Approaching Maturity Of Employment Law, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Discrimination Bans Demonstrate Approaching Maturity Of Employment Law, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
The pervasive message of this symposium sponsored by the Labor Relations Law Section, whether or not intended by the individual authors, is that American employment law is moving beyond adolescence and may be approaching maturity.
Legal Barriers To Worker Participation In Management Decision Making, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Legal Barriers To Worker Participation In Management Decision Making, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
Collective bargaining lies at the heart of the union-management relationship. It is the end and purpose of the whole effort to protect employees against reprisals when they form an organization to represent them in dealing with their employers. Collective bargaining is grounded in the belief that industrial strife will be checked, and the workers' lot bettered, if workers are given an effective voice in determining the conditions of their employment. My thesis is that federal law, even while placing the force of government behind collective bargaining, has so artificially confined its scope that the process has been seriously impeded from …
Deconstructing The Legislative Veto, Girardeau A. Spann
Deconstructing The Legislative Veto, Girardeau A. Spann
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
On June 23, 1983, the Supreme Court invalidated more federal statutes in a single day than it had in all of its prior history. In so doing, the Court also dramatically altered the allocation of governmental power between Congress and the President. At least that is how the press viewed the significance of INS v. Chadha, the decision invalidating the legislative veto device on which Congress had come to rely as an expedient method of controlling the exercise of executive discretion. Whether or not the hyperbole proves to have been warranted, the decision does possess a certain intrigue-it is not …