Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
County Of Contra Costa V. Lasky, Jesse W. Carter
County Of Contra Costa V. Lasky, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Daughter's sole income was what she received from her former husband for support of herself and child. Thus, alimony should not have been considered in determining her ability to support her mother, and she was not liable for such support.
Dexter V. Dexter [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Dexter V. Dexter [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The wife secured the approval of a separation agreement by the trial court, and after accepting the benefits thereof, she could not seek relief inconsistent with its terms by attempting to modify the monthly payments.
Fox V. Fox [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Fox V. Fox [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
It was error to award an ex-wife an increase in alimony and attorney fees under a divorce decree where the alimony provisions of the decree were an integral part of the ex-wife's property settlement agreement with her ex-husband.
Flynn V. Flynn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Flynn V. Flynn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Court had continuing jurisdiction to modify support payments even though the separation agreement was only incorporated by reference into the final decree of dissolution. Changed circumstances were not shown to warrant modification.