Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Kesler V. Pabst [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Kesler V. Pabst [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Judgment for driver in suit for damages sustained in car accident was proper as husband was contributorily negligent, his negligence was imputed to wife, and she could not convert community property into separate property after cause accrued.
Treu V. Kirkwood [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Treu V. Kirkwood [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
In a case where the evidence was not clearly persuasive in favor of either party, and where there was no indication as to the appraisal of the evidence by the trial court, the court reversed the judgment of the lower court for a new trial.
Price V. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Price V. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The trial court did not err in granting defendant's motion to dismiss one of plaintiff's causes of action against it under the Federal Employers' Liability Act based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Osborn V. Osborn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Osborn V. Osborn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Adverse judgment against son on his complaint to quiet title to real property was reversed where son acquired vested remainder interest when father executed deed pursuant to binding contract supported by adequate consideration.
Cockerell V. Title Ins. & Trust Co., Jesse W. Carter
Cockerell V. Title Ins. & Trust Co., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings was proper where the purported owners failed to prove a valid assignment of a deed of trust and did not raise the issue of denial on information and belief until appeal.
Record Machine & Tool Co. V. Pageman Holding Corp., Jesse W. Carter
Record Machine & Tool Co. V. Pageman Holding Corp., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
In a declaratory judgment action, it was proper for the trial court to make a determination of the value and effect of a patent title on the purchase price of a contract where the seller could not transfer the title because he did not own it.
H. J. Heinz Co. V. Superior Court Of Alameda County, Jesse W. Carter
H. J. Heinz Co. V. Superior Court Of Alameda County, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant's license for a patent was revoked, an order to destroy generators was upheld to prevent future infringement, a compensatory damage award was not recognized in state, and federal court had no jurisdiction to enjoin state court proceedings.