Law Commons^™

The Irrelevance Of Contemporary Academic Philosophy For Law: Recovering The Rhetorical Tradition / A Irrelevância Da Filosofia Acadêmica Contemporânea Para O Direito: Redescobrindo A Tradição Retórica, Francis J. Mootz

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

This short essay was published as part of a volume celebrating the 75th Anniversary of Karl Llewellyn’s article “On Philosophy in American Law.” The author argues that academic philosophy is irrelevant to lawyers, and that lawyers have little use for philosophical inquiry. This situation can be corrected by returning to the rhetorical and hermeneutical features of legal practice and reclaiming these ancient traditions of philosophical thought.

Este breve ensaio foi originalmente publicado como parte de uma obra em celebração ao aniversário de 75 anos do artigo “On Philosophy in American Law” de Karl Llewellyn. Argumenta-se que a filosofia acadêmica é …

Perelman In Legal Education: Recalling The Rhetorical Tradition Of Isocrates And Vico, Francis J. Mootz Iii

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

This paper was presented on October 14, 2008 as part of a panel addressing "The Influence of Perelman in Legal Philosophy" at a conference hosted by the Perelman Center for the Philosophy of Law, Free University of Brussels.

I argue that Perelman's philosophy is connected with legal practice, but that he never made the connections between his philosophy and legal education explicit. I refer to the work of Isocrates and Vico, and conclude that Perelman's philosophy can teach us much about contemporary legal education as we strive to address the questions raised by the Carnegie Report.