Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

American Edibles: How Cannabis Regulatory Policy Rehashes Prohibitionist Fears And What To Do About It, Jay D. Wexler, Connor Burns Jul 2021

American Edibles: How Cannabis Regulatory Policy Rehashes Prohibitionist Fears And What To Do About It, Jay D. Wexler, Connor Burns

Faculty Scholarship

Why can’t we buy a cannabis muffin with our morning coffee? For much of the past century, the answer was simple: cannabis was illegal. Now, however, with more and more states legalizing cannabis for adult use, the answer is far less clear. Even in those states that have legalized cannabis, the simple action of buying and eating edibles at the same location has somehow remained a pipe dream despite consumer demand. Digging a little deeper, we can see how contemporary alarmism, by rehashing the same prohibitionist rhetoric demonizing cannabis for over eighty years, has once again arisen with a new …


A Genetic Surveillance State: Are We One Buccal Swab Away From A Total Loss Of Genetic Privacy?, Catherine Arcabascio Jan 2020

A Genetic Surveillance State: Are We One Buccal Swab Away From A Total Loss Of Genetic Privacy?, Catherine Arcabascio

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Unintended Consequence To Legalizing Marijuana Use_ The Banking Conondrum, Florence Shu-Acquaye Jan 2016

The Unintended Consequence To Legalizing Marijuana Use_ The Banking Conondrum, Florence Shu-Acquaye

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Learning From The Past And Looking Toward The Future, Stephanie Bair Jan 2012

Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Learning From The Past And Looking Toward The Future, Stephanie Bair

Faculty Scholarship

A decade after the complete sequencing of the human genome, we have seen a proliferation of genetic testing services marketed directly to the consumer and purporting to use genetic information to generate individualized health information. These tests have been subject to only minimal regulation, despite the fact that scientists and policymakers have serious concerns about both the clinical effectiveness of the tests and the safety of releasing certain types of health information to the public without the supervision of a health care professional. Proponents of minimal regulation argue that the tests allow for patient autonomy and privacy of genetic information, …