Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

Faculty Scholarship

Duke Law

United States. Supreme Court

Articles 1 - 23 of 23

Full-Text Articles in Law

Judicial Independence In Excess: Reviving The Judicial Duty Of The Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington, Roger C. Cramton Jan 2009

Judicial Independence In Excess: Reviving The Judicial Duty Of The Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington, Roger C. Cramton

Faculty Scholarship

Independence from extrinsic influence is, we know, indispensable to public trust in the integrity of professional judges who share the duty to decide cases according to preexisting law. But such independence is less appropriate for those expected to make new law to govern future events. Indeed, in a democratic government those who make new law are expected to be accountable to their constituents, not independent of their interests and unresponsive to their desires. The Supreme Court of the United States has in the last century largely forsaken responsibility for the homely task of deciding cases in accord with preexisting law …


Choosing The Next Supreme Court Justice: An Empirical Ranking Of Judge Performance, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi Jan 2004

Choosing The Next Supreme Court Justice: An Empirical Ranking Of Judge Performance, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi

Faculty Scholarship

The judicial appointments process has grown increasingly frustrating in recent years. Both sides claim that their candidates are the "most meritorious" and yet this is seldom any discussion of what constitutes merit. Instead, the discussion moves immediately to the candidates' likely positions on hot-button political issues like abortion, gun control, and the death penalty. One side claims that it is proposing certain candidates based on merit, while the other claims that the real reason for pushing those candidates is their ideology and, in particular, their likely votes on key hot-button issues. With one side arguing merit and the other side …


Understanding The Rehnquist Court: An Admiring Reply To Professor Merril, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2003

Understanding The Rehnquist Court: An Admiring Reply To Professor Merril, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Self-Deregulation, The “National Policy” Of The Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington Jan 2002

Self-Deregulation, The “National Policy” Of The Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Does Federalism Advance Liberty?, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2002

Does Federalism Advance Liberty?, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Rhetoric Of Constitutional Law, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2002

The Rhetoric Of Constitutional Law, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Ensuring The Supremacy Of Federal Law: Why The District Court Was Wrong In Westside Mothers V. Haveman, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2002

Ensuring The Supremacy Of Federal Law: Why The District Court Was Wrong In Westside Mothers V. Haveman, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Closing The Courthouse Doors To Civil Rights Litigants, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2002

Closing The Courthouse Doors To Civil Rights Litigants, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Supreme Court 2000-2001 Term: First Amendment Cases, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2001

Supreme Court 2000-2001 Term: First Amendment Cases, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Hypocrisy Of ‘Alden V. Maine’: Judicial Review, Sovereign Immunity And The Rehnquist Court, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2000

The Hypocrisy Of ‘Alden V. Maine’: Judicial Review, Sovereign Immunity And The Rehnquist Court, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 2000

Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Supreme Court, Public Opinion, And The Role Of The Academic Commentator, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1999

The Supreme Court, Public Opinion, And The Role Of The Academic Commentator, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Rehnquist Court & Justice: An Oxymoron?, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1999

The Rehnquist Court & Justice: An Oxymoron?, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Restoring Vitaility To State And Local Politics By Correcting The Excessive Independance Of The Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington Jan 1999

Restoring Vitaility To State And Local Politics By Correcting The Excessive Independance Of The Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington

Faculty Scholarship

This Article endorses the view of such political "conservatives" as Robert Bork, Pat Buchanan, Orrin Hatch, and Ed Meese that the Constitution of the United States is deeply flawed in conferring too large a political role on life-tenured Supreme Court Justices. It argues that a constitutional amendment to correct excessive judicial independance is long overdue, a conclusion, it contends, that ought be shared by all who believe, as the author does, that the right to self-government is the parent right on which our civil liberties and the market economy ultimately depend and that healthy institutions of self-government require substantial devolution …


Formalism And Functionalism In Federalism Analysis, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1997

Formalism And Functionalism In Federalism Analysis, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


History, Tradition, The Supreme Court, And The First Amendment, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1993

History, Tradition, The Supreme Court, And The First Amendment, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Is The Rehnquist Court Really That Conservative?: An Analysis Of The 1991-92 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1993

Is The Rehnquist Court Really That Conservative?: An Analysis Of The 1991-92 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


October Tragedy, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1992

October Tragedy, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Supreme Court And The Fourteenth Amendment: The Unfulfilled Promise, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1992

The Supreme Court And The Fourteenth Amendment: The Unfulfilled Promise, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Congress, The Supreme Court, And The Eleventh Amendment: A Comment On The Decisions During The 1988-89 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1990

Congress, The Supreme Court, And The Eleventh Amendment: A Comment On The Decisions During The 1988-89 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The Constitution Is Not ‘Hard Law’: The Bork Rejection And The Future Of Constitutional Jurisprudence, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1989

The Constitution Is Not ‘Hard Law’: The Bork Rejection And The Future Of Constitutional Jurisprudence, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Foreword: The Vanishing Constitution, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1989

Foreword: The Vanishing Constitution, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


A Paradox Without A Principle: A Comment On The Burger Court’S Jurisprudence In Separation Of Powers Cases, Erwin Chemerinsky Jan 1987

A Paradox Without A Principle: A Comment On The Burger Court’S Jurisprudence In Separation Of Powers Cases, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.